Perception of Performance in Group Brainstorming: The Illusion of Group Productivity

Research has shown that individuals produce fewer ideas in interactive brainstorming groups than when brainstorming alone. However, group brainstorming remains a popular technique in organizations and industry. One basis for this popularity may be the perceived productivity of group brainstorming. A survey of expected performance in group brainstorming revealed that most individuals believed they would generate more ideas in groups than alone. Individuals who, in a second experiment, actually performed in brainstorming groups also perceived their performance more favorably than individuals who brainstormed alone. The results of a third experiment indicate that the illusion of group productivity may derive in part from the opportunity for social comparison that is available in group brainstorming. It also appears that individuals tend to take credit for a disproportionate amount of the brainstorming activity in groups.

[1]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[2]  J. Darley,et al.  Social Comparison Theory: Self-Evaluation and Group Life , 1987 .

[3]  S. Harkins.  Social Loafing and Social Facilitation , 1987 .

[4]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organizations , 1983 .

[5]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[6]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[8]  J. J. Seta,et al.  The Impact of Comparison Processes on Coactors' Frustration and Willingness to Expend Effort , 1991 .

[9]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons : some powerful and practicable procedures , 1991 .

[10]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[11]  Charles F. Gettys,et al.  A partition of small group predecision performance into informational and social components , 1984 .

[12]  M. Diehl,et al.  You Can't Beat Good Experiments With Correlational Evidence: Mullen, Johnson, and Salas's Meta-Analytic Misinterpretations , 1991 .

[13]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Can a Part be Greater Than the Whole? On the Relationship Between Primary and Meta-Analytic Evidence , 1991 .