SNAIL‐induced epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition produces concerted biophysical changes from altered cytoskeletal gene expression

A growing body of evidence suggests that the developmental process of epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) is co‐opted by cancer cells to metastasize to distant sites. This transition is associated with morphologic elongation and loss of cell‐cell adhesions, though little is known about how it alters cell biophysical properties critical for migration. Here, we use multiple‐particle tracking (MPT) microrheology and traction force cytometry to probe how genetic induction of EMT in epithelial MCF7 breast cancer cells changes their intracellular stiffness and extracellular force exertion, respectively, relative to an empty vector control. This analysis demonstrated that EMT alone was sufficient to produce dramatic cytoskeletal softening coupled with increases in cell‐exerted traction forces. Microarray analysis revealed that these changes corresponded with down‐regulation of genes associated with actin cross‐linking and up‐regulation of genes associated with actomyosin contraction. Finally, we show that this loss of structural integrity to expedite migration could inhibit mesenchymal cell proliferation in a secondary tumor as it accumulates solid stress. This work demonstrates that not only does EMT enable escape from the primary tumor through loss of cell adhesions but it also induces a concerted series of biophysical changes enabling enhanced migration of cancer cells after detachment from the primary tumor.—McGrail, D. J., Mezencev, R., Kieu, Q. M. N., McDonald, J. F., Dawson, M. R. SNAIL‐induced epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition produces concerted biophysical changes from altered cytoskeletal gene expression. FASEB J. 29, 1280‐1289 (2015). www.fasebj.org

[1]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  High-throughput ballistic injection nanorheology to measure cell mechanics , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[2]  Christopher G. Hill,et al.  Overexpression of miR-429 induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) in metastatic ovarian cancer cells. , 2011, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[4]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Casey M. Kraning-Rush,et al.  Cellular Traction Stresses Increase with Increasing Metastatic Potential , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  J. Connolly,et al.  Widespread loss of gelsolin in breast cancers of humans, mice, and rats. , 1996, Cancer research.

[7]  D. Tarin,et al.  The fallacy of epithelial mesenchymal transition in neoplasia. , 2005, Cancer research.

[8]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Mismatch in mechanical and adhesive properties induces pulsating cancer cell migration in epithelial monolayer. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[9]  M. Hung,et al.  Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3β-mediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  Matija Snuderl,et al.  Coevolution of solid stress and interstitial fluid pressure in tumors during progression: implications for vascular collapse. , 2013, Cancer research.

[11]  Christopher S. Poultney,et al.  A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[13]  K. Dahl,et al.  Active cytoskeletal force and chromatin condensation independently modulate intranuclear network fluctuations. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[14]  Kakajan Komurov,et al.  Core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition interactome gene-expression signature is associated with claudin-low and metaplastic breast cancer subtypes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Thomas G. Mason,et al.  Estimating the viscoelastic moduli of complex fluids using the generalized Stokes–Einstein equation , 2000 .

[16]  J. Thiery,et al.  Complex networks orchestrate epithelial–mesenchymal transitions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  David A Weitz,et al.  The role of vimentin intermediate filaments in cortical and cytoplasmic mechanics. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Richard Superfine,et al.  Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines. , 2011, Cancer research.

[19]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.

[20]  Andrei V Bakin,et al.  Down-regulation of WAVE3, a metastasis promoter gene, inhibits invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells. , 2007, The American journal of pathology.

[21]  S. Edge,et al.  Downregulation of Gelsolin Correlates with the Progression to Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  J. Thiery.  Epithelial–mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  R. Jain,et al.  Solid stress generated by spheroid growth estimated using a linear poroelasticity model. , 2003, Microvascular research.

[24]  C. Furlanello,et al.  Functional analysis of multiple genomic signatures demonstrates that classification algorithms choose phenotype-related genes , 2010, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[25]  Archana Dhasarathy,et al.  The Transcription Factor Snail Mediates Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transitions by Repression of Estrogen Receptor - , 2007 .

[26]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[28]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Generates Cells with Properties of Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[29]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[30]  S. Gerecht,et al.  The Differential Formation of the LINC-Mediated Perinuclear Actin Cap in Pluripotent and Somatic Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Michelle R. Dawson,et al.  Biomechanical analysis predicts decreased human mesenchymal stem cell function before molecular differences. , 2013, Experimental cell research.

[33]  J. Käs,et al.  Keratins significantly contribute to cell stiffness and impact invasive behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Michelle R. Dawson,et al.  Differential Mechanical Response of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Fibroblasts to Tumor-Secreted Soluble Factors , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Samy Lamouille,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  S. Narumiya,et al.  Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. , 1999, Science.

[39]  S. Weiss,et al.  A cancer cell metalloprotease triad regulates the basement membrane transmigration program. , 2006, Genes & development.

[40]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Particle-tracking microrheology of living cells: principles and applications. , 2009, Annual review of biophysics.

[41]  R. Huang,et al.  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease , 2009, Cell.

[42]  Michelle R. Dawson,et al.  The malignancy of metastatic ovarian cancer cells is increased on soft matrices through a mechanosensitive Rho–ROCK pathway , 2014, Journal of Cell Science.

[43]  E. Lander,et al.  Erratum: Core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition interactome gene-expression signature is associated with claudinlow and metaplastic breast cancer subtypes (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2010) 107:35 (15449-15454)) , 2010 .

[44]  Tyler E. Miller,et al.  Myosin II isoform switching mediates invasiveness after TGF-β–induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Byungkyu Kim,et al.  Cell Stiffness Is a Biomarker of the Metastatic Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[46]  D. Discher,et al.  Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[47]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Vimentin enhances cell elastic behavior and protects against compressive stress. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[48]  M. Nieto,et al.  The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[49]  Robert M. Hoffman,et al.  Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.