Current issues in species identification for forensic science and the validity of using the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene

Species identification techniques commonly utilized in Australian Forensic Science laboratories are gel immunodifussion antigen antibody reactions and hair comparison analysis. Both of these techniques have significant limitations and should be considered indicative opinion based tests. The Barcode of Life Initiative aims to sequence a section of DNA (~648 base pairs) for the Cytochrome Oxidase I mitochondrial gene (COI) in all living species on Earth, with the data generated being uploaded to the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) which can then be used for species identification. The COI gene therefore offers forensics scientists an opportunity to use the marker to analyze unknown samples and compare sequences generated in BOLD. Once sequences from enough species are on the database, it is anticipated that routine identification of an unknown species may be possible. However, most forensic laboratories are not yet suited to this type of analysis and do not have the expertise to fully interpret the implications of matches and non matches involving a poorly sampled taxa (for example where there are cryptic species) and in providing the required opinion evidence. Currently, the use of BOLD is limited by the number of relevant species held in the database and the quality assurance and regulation of sequences that are there. In this paper, the COI methodology and BOLD are tested on a selection of introduced and Australian mammals in a forensic environment as the first step necessary in the implementation of this approach in the Australian context. Our data indicates that the COI methodology performs well on distinct species but needs further exploration when identifying more closely related species. It is evident from our study that changes will be required to implement DNA based wildlife forensics using the BOLD approach for forensic applications and recommendations are made for the future adoption of this technology into forensic laboratories.

[1]  M. Nei,et al.  MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Robertson,et al.  DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics , 2010, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.

[4]  Richard Saferstein,et al.  Forensic Science Handbook , 2001 .

[5]  R. Honeycutt,et al.  THE MOLECULAR TOOLBOX: GENETIC TECHNIQUES IN WILDLIFE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT , 2005 .

[6]  J Mallet,et al.  A species definition for the modern synthesis. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Joseph Felsenstein,et al.  Parsimony in Systematics: Biological and Statistical Issues , 1983 .

[8]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Recommendations for animal DNA forensic and identity testing , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[9]  P. Hebert,et al.  Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  H. Brunner,et al.  The identification of mammalian hair , 1974 .

[11]  James Mallet,et al.  Taxonomy: renaissance or Tower of Babel? , 2003 .

[12]  C. Bellis,et al.  A molecular genetic approach for forensic animal species identification. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[13]  D. Lodge,et al.  Species Invasions from Commerce in Live Aquatic Organisms: Problems and Possible Solutions , 2007 .

[14]  H. Macdonell.  The identification of mammalian hairs , 1977 .

[15]  James Robertson.  Forensic Examination of Hair , 1999 .

[16]  NEW MITOCHONDRIAL DNA DATA AFFIRM THE IMPORTANCE OF PLEISTOCENE SPECIATION IN NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[18]  Örjan Ouchterlony,et al.  Handbook of immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis : with appendices by three other authorities, and an equipment section , 1968 .

[19]  M. Shimokomaki,et al.  Hamburger meat identification by dot-ELISA. , 2000, Meat science.

[20]  Pervaze A. Sheikh,et al.  International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S. Policy [Updated August 22, 2008] , 2008 .

[21]  Vincent Baeten,et al.  Methods of detection, species identification and quantification of processed animal proteins in feedingstuffs , 2009 .

[22]  M. Lynch,et al.  A method for calibrating molecular clocks and its application to animal mitochondrial DNA. , 1993, Genetics.

[23]  Li-Chin Tsai,et al.  Species identification of rhinoceros horns using the cytochrome b gene. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[24]  Rob Ogden,et al.  Validation of the barcoding gene COI for use in forensic genetic species identification. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[25]  M. Steinlechner,et al.  Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene , 2000, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[26]  K. Will,et al.  Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification , 2004, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[27]  Oliver Berry,et al.  Gel‐free species identification using melt‐curve analysis , 2006 .

[28]  L. Singh,et al.  Novel universal primers establish identity of an enormous number of animal species for forensic application , 2002 .

[29]  R. Harrison.  Molecular Changes at Speciation , 1991 .

[30]  A. K. Daníelsdóttir,et al.  Identification of marine mammal species in food products. , 2000 .

[31]  R. Alford,et al.  Emerging infectious disease and the loss of biodiversity in a Neotropical amphibian community. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  S. J. Olsen.  Origins of the Domestic Dog: The Fossil Record , 1985 .

[33]  M. Kimura.  A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences , 1980, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[34]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  John Avise.  Books Received , 2000, Heredity.

[36]  D. Brack,et al.  The growth and control of international environmental crime. , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[37]  Rob Ogden,et al.  Wildlife DNA forensics—bridging the gap between conservation genetics and law enforcement , 2009 .

[38]  G. Wörheide,et al.  CO1 phylogenies in diploblasts and the 'Barcoding of Life' — are we sequencing a suboptimal partition? , 2006 .

[39]  W. Symondson.  Molecular identification of prey in predator diets , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[40]  Jane Holden.  By hook or by crook : a reference manual on illegal wildlife trade and prosecutions in the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[41]  S Rozen,et al.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.

[42]  P. Hebert,et al.  Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes , 2004, PLoS biology.

[43]  M. Blaxter.  The promise of a DNA taxonomy. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[44]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[45]  P. Shaw,et al.  Application of cytochrome b DNA sequences for the authentication of endangered snake species. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[46]  Rob Ogden,et al.  A DNA‐Based Approach for the Forensic Identification of Asiatic Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus) in a Traditional Asian Medicine * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[47]  Oliver Berry,et al.  Faecal DNA detection of invasive species: the case of feral foxes in Tasmania , 2007 .

[48]  C. Cicero,et al.  Open access, freely available online Correspondence DNA Barcoding: Promise and Pitfalls , 2022 .