Optimization of overlapping activities in the design phase of construction projects

Abstract A well-known practice to accelerate construction projects is to overlap the design phase activities. For a typical construction project, a number of overlapping strategies exist during the design phase which all can result in timesaving. However, the cost of these strategies varies significantly depending on the total rework and complexity they generate. A favorable overlapping strategy is one that generates the required timesaving at the minimum cost. To find such a strategy, the question “Which activities have to be overlapped and to what extent to reduce the project duration at the minimum cost?” should be answered. This research aimed at answering the question through generating an overlapping optimization algorithm. The algorithm works based on the principles of genetic algorithms (GAs). The algorithm explained in the paper is unique compared to previous algorithms and frameworks available in the literature, as it can optimize multi-path networks and can handle all types of activity dependencies (i.e. finish-to-start, start-to-start, and finish-to-finish). It also takes both critical and non-critical activities into account and follows the critical path if the critical path changes or new critical paths emerge. A computer tool was also developed to run, examine and validate the overlapping optimization algorithm. This paper introduces the algorithm and the computer tool in detail and explains the results of their validation through optimizing a real-world project schedule.

[1]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Tarek Hegazy Optimization of construction time-cost trade-off analysis using genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[3]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Strategies for overlapping dependent design activities , 2006 .

[4]  HaziniKamran,et al.  A heuristic method to determine optimum degree of activity accelerating and overlapping in schedule compression , 2013 .

[5]  Viswanathan V Krishnan,et al.  Managing the simultaneous execution of coupled phases in concurrent product development , 1996 .

[6]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  DYNAMIC PLANNING AND CONTROL METHODOLOGY FOR DESIGN/BUILD FAST-TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2001 .

[7]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[8]  Raad Yahya Qassim,et al.  Project Acceleration via Activity Crashing, Overlapping, and Substitution , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Makarand Hastak,et al.  Time and Cost-Optimized Decision Support Model for Fast-Track Projects , 2013 .

[10]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Accelerating Product Development by the Exchange of Preliminary Product Design Information , 1995 .

[11]  Fabio Nicolò,et al.  A concurrent engineering decision model: Management of the project activities information flows , 1998 .

[12]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  An optimization-based model for maximizing the benefits of fast-track construction activities , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Approach to Reducing Design Delivery Time , 2005 .

[14]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Simulation of Overlapping Design Activities in Concurrent Engineering , 2011 .

[15]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development , 2000, Oper. Res..

[16]  Issam Srour,et al.  A methodology for scheduling overlapped design activities based on dependency information , 2013 .

[17]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[18]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[19]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  A review of methods and algorithms for optimizing construction scheduling , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Applying a Genetic Algorithm-Based Multiobjective Approach for Time-Cost Optimization , 2004 .

[21]  Chung-Wei Feng,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems , 1997 .

[22]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development , 2004, Oper. Res..

[23]  Reza Dehghan,et al.  Model of Trade-Off between Overlapping and Rework of Design Activities , 2014 .

[24]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability , 1995 .

[25]  Reza Dehghan A new model, algorithm and computer tool to optimize overlapping of design activities in construction projects , 2011 .

[26]  David K. H. Chua,et al.  Overlapping design and construction activities and an optimization approach to minimize rework , 2014 .

[27]  Janaka Y. Ruwanpura,et al.  Optimum Activity Overlapping using Genetic Algorithms , 2011, ISEC 2011.

[28]  J. Y. Ruwanpura,et al.  The Mechanism of Design Activity Overlapping in Construction Projects and the Time-Cost Tradeoff Function , 2011 .

[29]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Sensitivity of Construction Activities under Design Uncertainty , 2009 .

[30]  Eiichi Gotoh,et al.  CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT , 1991 .

[31]  Robert Pellerin,et al.  Time-cost trade-offs in resource-constraint project scheduling problems with overlapping modes , 2014 .