Fluid–structure interaction analysis of flexible composite marine propellers

Abstract There is an increasing interest in the marine industry to use composites to improve the hydrodynamic and structural performance of naval structures. Composite materials have high strength-to-weight and stiffness-to-weight ratios, and the fiber orientations can be exploited to tailor the structural deformation to reduce the load and stress variations by automatically adjusting the shape of the structure. For marine propellers, the bending–twisting coupling characteristics of anisotropic composites can be exploited to passively tailor the blade rake, skew, and pitch distributions to improve propeller performance. To fully explore the advantages of composite marine propellers, a coupled boundary element (BEM) and finite element (FEM) approach is presented to study the fluid–structure interaction of flexible composite propellers in subcavitating and cavitating flows. An overview of the formulation for both the fluid and structural models is presented. Experimental validation studies are shown for two composite propellers tested at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWCCD). The feasibility of passive hydroelastic tailoring of composite marine propellers is discussed.

[1]  Gau-Feng Lin Comparative Stress/Deflection Analyses of a Thick-Shell Composite Propeller Blade , 1991 .

[2]  J E Kerwin,et al.  PREDICTION OF STEADY AND UNSTEADY MARINE PROPELLER PERFORMANCE BY NUMERICAL LIFTING-SURFACE THEORY , 1978 .

[3]  Spyros A. Kinnas,et al.  A NONLINEAR BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF UNSTEADY PROPELLER SHEET CAVITATION , 1994 .

[4]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  Numerical modeling of supercavitating propeller flows , 2003 .

[5]  N. Pagano,et al.  Exact Solutions for Composite Laminates in Cylindrical Bending , 1969 .

[6]  J. E. Kerwin,et al.  Numerical methods for propeller design and analysis in steady flow , 1982 .

[7]  S. Kinnas,et al.  A numerical nonlinear analysis of the flow around two- and three-dimensional partially cavitating hydrofoils , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  Ya-Jung Lee,et al.  Stacking sequence optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithm with local improvement , 2004 .

[9]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  Performance Prediction of Surface-Piercing Propellers , 2004 .

[10]  T. Searle,et al.  Are composite propellers. The way forward for small boats , 1994 .

[11]  Adrian P. Mouritz,et al.  Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines , 2001 .

[12]  Z. Hashin Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites , 1980 .

[13]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  Analysis of supercavitating and surface-piercing propeller flows via BEM , 2003 .

[14]  Ya-Jung Lee,et al.  Optimized Design of Composite Propeller , 2004 .

[15]  Y. L. Young,et al.  A BEM for the Prediction of Unsteady Midchord Face and/or Back Propeller Cavitation , 2001 .

[16]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  Time-dependent hydroelastic analysis of cavitating propulsors , 2007 .

[17]  Huei-Jeng Lin,et al.  Nonlinear hydroelastic behavior of propellers using a finite-element method and lifting surface theory , 1996 .

[18]  Y. L. Young,et al.  Modeling of cavitating or ventilated flows using BEM , 2003 .

[19]  Hsiu-Jen Lin,et al.  Strength Evaluation of a Composite Marine Propeller Blade , 2005 .