Client-Based Adjustments of Hearing Aid Gain: The Effect of Different Control Configurations

Objectives: Facilitating the fine-tuning of advanced hearing aids requires information about the acoustic environment. The concept of a “trainable” hearing aid may provide a more direct approach to hearing aid fine-tuning if the aid user is allowed to control the most important fitting parameters in his/her own acoustic environments. Design: In a laboratory study, the concept of self-adjustment of the gain-frequency response was tested by 24 hearing aid users using four different controllers with a limited number of control functions. Research questions focused on the reproducibility of the fine-tuned responses, the efficiency of the control configurations, and the effects of the control configuration on the end results of the fine-tuning process. Results: The subjects were able to provide systematic and reproducible feedback with respect to their preferences in different acoustic conditions presented audiovisually, achieving an average short- term test/retest standard deviation value of 2.8 dB. Two of the control configurations, featuring volume/slope and volume/bass/treble keys, were found to be more time-efficient and reliable, and were also preferred by 86% of the subjects. Although the control configuration did not have a strong influence on the end result, the gain-frequency response from which the subjects started their adjustments was found to have a significant effect on their preferred settings. Conclusions: Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain provide a reliable method of individual fine-tuning. The results also showed that a biased correction of amplification is reached via self-adjustment within one session, which reduces the effectiveness of fine-tuning in a traditional clinical setting.

[1]  R M Cox,et al.  The Contour Test of Loudness Perception , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[2]  B Hagerman,et al.  Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[3]  J Kiessling Hearing aid fitting procedures - state-of-the-art and current issues , 2001, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[4]  R. Beattie,et al.  IHAFF loudness contour test: reliability and effects of approach mode in normal-hearing subjects. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  Lorienne M Jenstad,et al.  Hearing aid troubleshooting based on patients' descriptions. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[6]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  Preferred overall loudness. I: Sound field presentation in the laboratory , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[7]  B C Moore,et al.  Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids. , 1998, British journal of audiology.

[8]  G Keidser,et al.  An efficient, adaptive method of measuring loudness growth functions. , 1999, Scandinavian audiology.

[9]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  The Design and Evaluation of a Hearing Aid with Trainable Amplification Parameters , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Methodological aspects of an adaptive multidirectional pattern search to optimize speech perception using three hearing-aid algorithms , 2004 .

[11]  Francis K. Kuk How flow charts can help you troubleshoot hearing aid problems , 1999 .

[12]  Michael Nilsson,et al.  Development of a test environment to evaluate performance of modern hearing aid features. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[13]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The preferred response slopes and two-channel compression ratios in twenty listening conditions by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners and their relationship to the acoustic input , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[15]  Thomas A. Powers,et al.  Three‐microphone instrument is designed to extend benefits of directionality , 2002 .

[16]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The trainable hearing aid: What will it do for clients and clinicians? , 2006 .

[17]  David A. Preves,et al.  Effects Of CIC, ITC, And ITE Microphone Placement On The Amplification Of Wind Noise , 1994 .

[18]  Norbert Dillier,et al.  Sound Classification in Hearing Aids Inspired by Auditory Scene Analysis , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[19]  F K Kuk,et al.  Effect of initial setting on convergence to optimal hearing aid setting using a simplex method. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[20]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Test‐Retest Reliability of Loudness Scaling , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[21]  L E Humes,et al.  The reliability of functional gain. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[22]  G Keidser The Relationship Between Listening Conditions and Alternative Amplification Schemes for Multiple Memory Hearing Aids , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[23]  K. Robinson,et al.  Adult auditory learning and training. , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[24]  G Keidser,et al.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.