Building an Ensemble of Complementary Segmentation Methods by Exploiting Probabilistic Estimates

Two common ways of approaching atlas-based segmentation of brain MRI are (1) intensity-based modelling and (2) multi-atlas label fusion. Intensity-based methods are robust to registration errors but need distinctive image appearances. Multi-atlas label fusion can identify anatomical correspondences with faint appearance cues, but needs a reasonable registration. We propose an ensemble segmentation method that combines the complementary features of both types of approaches. Our method uses the probabilistic estimates of the base methods to compute their optimal combination weights in a spatially varying way. We also propose an intensity-based method (to be used as base method) that offers a trade-off between invariance to registration errors and dependence on distinct appearances. Results show that sacrificing invariance to registration errors (up to a certain degree) improves the performance of our intensity-based method. Our proposed ensemble method outperforms the rest of participating methods in most of the structures of the NeoBrainS12 Challenge on neonatal brain segmentation. We achieve up to \(\sim \)10 % of improvement in some structures.

[1]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Jyrki Lötjönen,et al.  Robust whole-brain segmentation: Application to traumatic brain injury , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  An Open Source Multivariate Framework for n-Tissue Segmentation with Evaluation on Public Data , 2011, Neuroinformatics.

[5]  Oualid M. Benkarim,et al.  Discriminative Dimensionality Reduction for Patch-Based Label Fusion , 2015, MLMMI@ICML.

[6]  Qinghua Hu,et al.  Exploration of classification confidence in ensemble learning , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Eight Tissue Classes in Neonatal Brain MRI , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Automatic Whole Brain MRI Segmentation of the Developing Neonatal Brain , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Evaluation of automatic neonatal brain segmentation algorithms: The NeoBrainS12 challenge , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  L G Nyúl,et al.  On standardizing the MR image intensity scale , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: Application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  Pascal Fua,et al.  SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.