Sources of error in picture naming under time pressure

We used a deadline procedure to investigate how time pressure may influence the processes involved in picture naming. The deadline exaggerated errors found under naming without deadline. There were also category differences in performance between living and nonliving things and, in particular, for animals versus fruit and vegetables. The majority of errors were visually and semantically related to the target (e.g., celery—asparagus), and there was a greater proportion of these errors made to living things. Importantly, there were also more visual-semantic errors to animals than to fruit and vegetables. In addition, there were a smaller number of pure semantic errors (e.g., nut—bolt), which were made predominantly to nonliving things. The different kinds of error were correlated with different variables. Overall, visual-semantic errors were associated with visual complexity and visual similarity, whereas pure semantic errors were associated with imageability and age of acquisition. However, for animals, visual-semantic errors were associated with visual complexity, whereas for fruit and vegetables they were associated with visual similarity. We discuss these findings in terms of theories of category-specific semantic impairment and models of picture naming.

[1]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991 .

[3]  Christian Gerlach,et al.  Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1996 .

[5]  S. A. Wurst,et al.  Complexity effects on reaction-time measures of visual persistence: evidence for peripheral and central contributions. , 1984, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Category-Specific Semantic Deficits in Focal and Widespread Brain Damage: A Computational Account , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  B. Gordon Models of Naming , 1997 .

[9]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  A. Paivio,et al.  Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  M J Tarr,et al.  Recognizing Silhouettes and Shaded Images across Depth Rotation , 1999, Perception.

[12]  Tim Valentine,et al.  The effects of age of acquisition on object perception , 2004 .

[13]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[14]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  The Emergence of a Double Dissociation in the Modulation of a Single Control Parameter in a Nonlinear Dynamical System , 2003, Cortex.

[16]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Category specificity in brain and mind , 2002 .

[17]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[18]  D. Vernon,et al.  The Role of Colour in Implicit and Explicit Memory Performance , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[20]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[21]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .

[22]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[23]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[24]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[25]  Lyndsey Nickels,et al.  Spoken Word Production and Its Breakdown In Aphasia , 1997 .

[26]  Martin Arguin,et al.  The Interaction of Object Form and Object M eaning in the Identification Performance of a Patient with Category-specific Visual Agnosia , 1997 .

[27]  Randall J. Frank,et al.  Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[29]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and the Locus of Repetition Priming of Picture Naming , 2001 .

[30]  Toby J. Lloyd-Jones,et al.  Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Dana Samson,et al.  A CASE OF IMPAIRED KNOWLEDGE FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLES , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[32]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  T. Gale,et al.  Category-Specific Naming and the ‘Visual’ Characteristics of Line Drawn Stimuli , 2002, Cortex.

[34]  J. Carroll,et al.  Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns , 1973 .

[35]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Double Dissociation of Semantic Categories in Alzheimer's Disease , 1997, Brain and Language.

[36]  E. Capitani,et al.  A Case of Prevailing Deficit of Nonliving Categories or a Case of Prevailing Sparing of Living Categories? , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[37]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[40]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[41]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[42]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Categorizing chairs and naming pears: Category differences in object processing as a function of task and priming , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[43]  M. M. Meyer,et al.  Can recognotion of living things be selectively impaired? , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[45]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[47]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE ON VISUAL DISCRIMINATION , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[48]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The organization of object knowledge: evidence from neuropsychology , 1993 .

[49]  Daragh E. Sibley,et al.  A computational exploration of double dissociations: modes of processing instead of components of processing , 2005, Cognitive Systems Research.

[50]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Word age-of-acquisition and residence time in lexical memory as factors in word naming , 1984 .

[51]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROIMAGING PERSPECTIVES ON CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE: AN INTRODUCTION , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[52]  T. Shallice From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure , 1988 .

[53]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Anomia : neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates , 1997 .

[54]  Lyndsey Nickels,et al.  Getting it right? Using aphasic naming errors to evaluate theoretical models of spoken word recognition , 1995 .

[55]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perseverant responding in speeded naming of pictures: It's in the links. , 1991 .

[57]  L. Tyler,et al.  Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Disentangling Context Availability and Concreteness in Lexical Decision and W ord Translation , 1998 .

[59]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Timed picture naming in seven languages , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  Joan G. Snodgrass,et al.  The role of visual similarity in picture categorization , 1986 .

[61]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[62]  E. Warrington,et al.  Category-specific naming preservation: a single case study. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[63]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[64]  K. Laws,et al.  A ‘normal’ category-specific advantage for naming living things , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  A. Caramazza,et al.  WHAT ARE THE FACTS OF SEMANTIC CATEGORY-SPECIFIC DEFICITS? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CLINICAL EVIDENCE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[66]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? , 1990 .

[67]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[68]  G. Humphreys,et al.  An interactive activation approach to object processing: effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology. , 1995, Memory.

[69]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Strategic Control Over Rate of Processing in Word Reading: A Computational Investigation of the Tempo-Naming Task , 2000 .

[70]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Are living and non-living category-specific deficits causally linked to impaired perceptual or associative knowledge? evidence from a category-specific double dissociation , 1998 .

[71]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  Toby J. Lloyd-Jones,et al.  Effects of plane rotation, task, and complexity on recognition of familiar and chimeric objects , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[73]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[74]  M. Silveri,et al.  Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment , 1988 .

[75]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[76]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[77]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  On Naming a Giraffe a Zebra: Picture Naming Errors Across Different Object Categories , 1993 .

[78]  R. Berndt,et al.  Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction , 1985, Nature.

[79]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1992 .

[81]  M. Vitkovitch,et al.  Sources of Disagreement in Object Naming , 1995 .

[82]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks , 2004 .

[83]  Lyndsey Nickels,et al.  A frequent occurrence? factors affecting the production of semantic errors in aphasic naming , 1994 .

[84]  D. Plaut Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[85]  E. Warrington Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[86]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[87]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[88]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[89]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  Inferring Perceptual Saliency Fields from Viewpoint-Dependent Recognition Data , 1999, Neural Computation.

[90]  C. Morrison Interpret with Caution: Multicollinearity in Multiple Regression of Cognitive Data , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[91]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Semantically-bounded anomia: Implications for the neural implementation of naming , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[92]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.