Linguistic Priming and Learning Adjacent and Non-Adjacent Dependencies in Serial Reaction Time Tasks

Although syntactic priming is well studied and commonly assumed to involve implicit learning, the mechanisms behind this phenomenon are still under debate. We tested whether implicit learning of adjacent and non-adjacent sequences occurs in a non-linguistic, finger sequence task (Serial Reaction Time task), and if so, whether these implicitly-learned dependencies can cause syntactic priming in the linguistic domain. We followed the logic that exposure to statistical patterns in the SRT task may influence language users’ relative clause (RC) attachment biases, and trained participants on SRT sequences with adjacent or non-adjacent dependencies. Participants then wrote completions to relative clause fragments in a situation where they could opt for adjacent or non-adjacent linguistic structures. Participants successfully learned the adjacent and non-adjacent dependency implicitly during the SRT task, but, strikingly, their RC continuations did not exhibit priming effects. Implications for theories of syntactic priming and its relations to implicit learning are discussed.

[1]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[2]  A. Kehler,et al.  Anticipating explanations in relative clause processing , 2011, Cognition.

[3]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production , 2003, Cognition.

[4]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays : Evidence from written and spoken dialogue , 2008 .

[5]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[7]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[8]  Felix Wang,et al.  Characterizing the Difference Between Learning about Adjacent and Non-adjacent Dependencies , 2015, CogSci.

[9]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Bidirectional Syntactic Priming across Cognitive Domains: From Arithmetic to Language and Back , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Is there a domain-general cognitive structuring system? Evidence from structural priming across music, math, action descriptions, and language , 2016, Cognition.

[11]  Alex B. Fine,et al.  Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.