Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold

The motor threshold (MT) is a fundamental parameter for evaluating cortical excitability in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) despite remarkable variation, both within, and between subjects. We intended to test whether the variation could be reduced by targeting the stimulation on-line and modeling the TMS-induced electric field on individual MR images. Navigated TMS was used to map the primary motor cortex for the representation area of the thenar muscles (abductor pollicis brevis) and to determine the MT. Thirteen healthy subjects participated in the study. To determine the between-subject variation, the MTs of nine subjects were measured with two different stimulators (comparison study). To study the individual variation, the MT measurement was repeated 20 times in four subjects always using the same stimulator (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the MTs differed significantly between the two stimulators over all subjects (p<0.001), whereas the electric field strengths did not exhibit significant difference between the stimulators. Both, the MTs, and the electric field strengths showed similar variations, which were greater between subjects (comparison study) than within subjects (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the distance between the locations of the two different coils on the scalp was significantly greater than the distance between the induced electric field maxima in the brain (p<0.001). We conclude that on-line navigation can be used to reduce the variation caused by different stimulator types and individual subject anatomy. In addition, cortical excitability can be evaluated by using computed electric field strength as well as stimulator-dependent MT.

[1]  Lisa Koski,et al.  Normative data on changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation measures over a ten hour period , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Malcolm,et al.  Reliability of motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in four muscle representations , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  K. Mills,et al.  Magnetic and electrical transcranial brain stimulation: physiological mechanisms and clinical applications. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[4]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Linking Physics with Physiology in TMS: A Sphere Field Model to Determine the Cortical Stimulation Site in TMS , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  T. Kammer,et al.  Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  K. Chiappa,et al.  Clinical applications of motor evoked potentials. , 1993, Advances in neurology.

[7]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Motor cortex excitability in Alzheimer's disease: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[8]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[9]  C. Civardi,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries of cortico-cortical connections in human hand motor areas , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Benoit M. Macq,et al.  Registration and real-time visualization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with 3-D MR images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  P. Rossini,et al.  Electric vs magnetic trans-cranial stimulation of the brain in healthy humans: a comparative study of central motor tracts ‘conductivity’ and ‘excitability’ , 1989, Brain Research.

[13]  A. Costantini,et al.  Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: comparison of three estimation methods , 2006, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  B. Shahani,et al.  Hemispheric threshold differences for motor evoked potentials produced by magnetic coil stimulation , 1991, Neurology.

[15]  P M Rossini,et al.  Interhemispheric differences of hand muscle representation in human motor cortex , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[16]  F. Awiszus,et al.  Characterisation of paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation conditions yielding intracortical inhibition or I-wave facilitation using a threshold-hunting paradigm , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  P. Rossini,et al.  Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[18]  C. Cordova,et al.  TYPE-III HYPERLIPOPROTEINAEMIA , 1975, The Lancet.

[19]  H. Topka,et al.  Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  K. Mills,et al.  Corticomotor threshold to magnetic stimulation: Normal values and repeatability , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  Antti Korvenoja,et al.  Somatotopic blocking of sensation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[22]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Comparison of different methods for estimating motor threshold with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  E. Wassermann Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  V. Romei,et al.  Corticospinal excitability and sleep: a motor threshold assessment by transcranial magnetic stimulation after awakenings from REM and NREM sleep , 2004, Journal of sleep research.

[25]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.

[26]  M. Ridding,et al.  Stability of Maps of Human Motor Cortex Made with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[27]  Tracy R. Henderson,et al.  Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  K. Mills,et al.  The repeatability of corticomotor threshold measurements , 2004, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Tibbs Dj,et al.  BLADDER CANCER AND THE RUBBER INDUSTRY. , 1965 .

[30]  F. Awiszus TMS and threshold hunting. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Modeling of the stimulating field generation in TMS. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[32]  Steven L Wolf,et al.  Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[35]  B. Greenberg,et al.  Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability , 1999, Neurology.

[36]  Petro Julkunen,et al.  Factors influencing cortical silent period: Optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  A. Eisen,et al.  Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human motor cortex. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation--a new tool for functional imaging of the brain. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[39]  P M Rossini,et al.  Clinical applications of motor evoked potentials. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  Jejo D. Koola,et al.  The Maximum-likelihood Strategy for Determining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Threshold, Using Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing Is Faster Than Conventional Methods With Similar Precision , 2004, The journal of ECT.

[41]  C. Boccagni,et al.  Cortical excitability and sleep deprivation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[42]  Didier Cros,et al.  Physiological motor asymmetry in human handedness: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1994, Brain Research.

[43]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in conscious humans. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  O. Steinsträter,et al.  Scalp position and efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  N. Murray,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF CENTRAL MOTOR CONDUCTION IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS BY MAGNETIC BRAIN STIMULATION , 1986, The Lancet.