On Measuring Implant Fixation Stability in ACL Reconstruction

Numerous methods and devices are available for implant fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Biomechanical data indicate high variability in fixation stability across different devices. This study aims to provide a better insight into measuring the structural characteristics and mechanical behavior of ACL implant fixations. Fourteen human tibial specimens with reconstructed ACLs were subjected to progressively increasing dynamic loading until failure. The motions of the tibia, the proximal and distal graft ends, as well as the testing frame and actuator, were continuously recorded via a motion tracking system. Significantly higher displacements of the machine actuator (1.0 mm at graft slippage onset, and 12.2 mm at ultimate load) were measured compared to the displacements of the proximal (0.8 and 4.3 mm, respectively) and distal graft (0.1 and 3.4 mm, respectively) ends. The displacements measured at different sites showed significant correlations. The provided data suggest significant and systematic inaccuracies in the stiffness and slippage of the fixation when using machine displacement, as commonly reported in the literature. The assessment of the distal graft displacement excludes the artifactual graft elongation, and most accurately reflects the graft slippage onset indicating clinical failure. Considering the high displacement at the ultimate load, the ultimate load could be used as a standardized variable to compare different fixation methods. However, the ultimate load alone is not sufficient to qualitatively describe fixation stability.

[1]  Joanna Kvist,et al.  Dynamic and static tibial translation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency initially treated with a structured rehabilitation protocol , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[2]  Mika Vihavainen,et al.  The Fixation Strength of Six Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation Devices in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II: Tibial Site * , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  L. Salmon,et al.  The outcome at 15 years of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft for 'isolated' anterior cruciate ligament rupture. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of different anterior cruciate ligament fixation techniques for hamstring graft , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[6]  R K Korhonen,et al.  Optimal graft stiffness and pre-strain restore normal joint motion and cartilage responses in ACL reconstructed knee. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  R. Smolinski,et al.  Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. , 2001, The American journal of knee surgery.

[8]  C. Fink,et al.  Suspensory fixation of grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of 3 implants. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  M. Hull,et al.  Contributions of femoral fixation methods to the stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament replacements at implantation. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  C. Wijdicks,et al.  Adjustable- Versus Fixed-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: An In Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Study of Surgical Technique–Based Tibial Fixation and Graft Preparation , 2018, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[11]  T. Bae,et al.  A Comparative Biomechanical Study of Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft-Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Adjustable-Length Loop Versus Fixed-Length Loop. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[12]  Keith O. Monchik,et al.  A comparison of three adjustable cortical button ACL fixation devices , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[13]  M. Schofer,et al.  Comparison between bovine bone and titanium interference screws for implant fixation in ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical study , 2010, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  K. Eriksson,et al.  Increased Risk of Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  M. Hull,et al.  Structural Properties of Six Tibial Fixation Methods for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft Tissue Grafts , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  Giuseppe Milano,et al.  Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[17]  R. Attal,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Preparation Techniques for Tibial Fixation , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  Darren M. Palathinkal,et al.  In vitro biomechanical testing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: traditional versus physiologically relevant load analysis. , 2011, The Knee.

[19]  R. Ostrander,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Fixed-Loop and Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Devices for Metaphyseal Femoral-Sided Soft Tissue Graft Fixation in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Porcine Model. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[20]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  A biomechanical comparison of the endobutton cl using transtibial drilling and endobutton direct using anteromedial arthroscopic drilling. , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  B. Lee,et al.  Comparative biomechanical study of the Ligament Plate® and other fixation devices in ACL reconstruction , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[22]  Roald Bahr,et al.  Likelihood of ACL graft rupture: not meeting six clinical discharge criteria before return to sport is associated with a four times greater risk of rupture , 2016, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[23]  R. Peindl,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of hamstring tendon fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: part 1. Five femoral devices. , 2015, American journal of orthopedics.

[24]  C. Wijdicks,et al.  Adjustable‐length loop cortical button versus interference screw fixation in quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – A biomechanical in vitro study , 2018, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  I. McNamara,et al.  Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment. , 2014, The Knee.

[26]  C. Fabbriciani,et al.  Comparison of femoral fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft: a mechanical analysis in porcine knees , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[27]  Cheng-Kung Cheng,et al.  Stiffness and shape of the ACL graft affects tunnel enlargement and graft wear , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[28]  Mika Vihavainen,et al.  The Fixation Strength of Six Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation Devices in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part I: Femoral Site * , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  K. Gall,et al.  Adjustable-Loop Femoral Cortical Suspensory Fixation for Patellar Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Time Zero Biomechanical Comparison With Interference Screw Fixation , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[30]  R. LaPrade,et al.  Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[31]  R. Peindl,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of hamstring tendon fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Part 2. Four tibial devices. , 2015, American journal of orthopedics.