Toward an integrated seismic risk assessment for nuclear safety improving current French methodologies through the SINAPS@ research project

Abstract The Tohoku earthquake and associated tsunami in March 2011 caused a severe nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, where level 7 (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) – INES scale) meltdown at three reactors occurred. The underestimation of the seismic and tsunami hazards has been recognized and the seismic margins assessment of the nuclear plants remains a priority for the whole nuclear community. In this framework a five-year research project called SINAPS@ (Earthquake and Nuclear Installations: Ensuring and Sustaining Safety) is currently on-going in France. A reliable estimate of seismic margins is possible only if all uncertainties, epistemic and aleatory, are effectively identified, quantified and integrated in the seismic risk analysis. SINAPS@ brings together a multidisciplinary community of researchers and engineers from the academic and the nuclear world. SINAPS@ aims at exploring the uncertainties associated to databases, physical processes and methods used at each stage of seismic hazard, site effects, soil and structure interaction, structural and nuclear components vulnerability assessments, in a safety approach: the main objective is ultimately to identify the sources of potential seismic margins resulting from assumptions or when selecting the seismic design level or the design strategy. The whole project is built around an “integrating” work package enabling to test state-of-the-art practices and to challenge new methodologies for seismic risk assessment: the real case of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Japanese nuclear plant, shocked by the severe earthquake in 2007 provided a rich dataset which will be used to compare with the predictions. The present paper proposes for each step of the seismic risk analysis a review of the state of practice in France in the nuclear field and then precise the objectives and research strategy of SINAPS@ to overcome identified limitations or weaknesses. Scientific issues are illustrated through preliminary results of the project.

[1]  Wei Sun,et al.  Finite element modelling of the effect of temperature and neutron dose on the fracture behaviour of nuclear reactor graphite bricks , 2014 .

[2]  H. Dumontet,et al.  Dissipative Homogenised Reinforced Concrete (DHRC) constitutive model dedicated to reinforced concrete plates under seismic loading , 2015 .

[3]  Christian Soize,et al.  Probabilistic impedance of foundation: Impact of the seismic design on uncertain soils , 2008 .

[4]  Christian Soize,et al.  Construction of a probabilistic model for impedance matrices , 2007 .

[5]  Ryan T. Coppersmith,et al.  A SSHAC Level 3 Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for a New-Build Nuclear Site in South Africa , 2015 .

[6]  A. Imtiaz Seismic wave field, spatial variability and coherency of ground motion over short distances : near source and alluvial valley effects , 2015 .

[7]  George Gazetas,et al.  SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION: BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL? , 2000 .

[8]  J. Enrique Luco,et al.  Assessment of predictions of the response of the Hualien containment model during forced vibration tests , 2004 .

[9]  F. Cotton,et al.  NEW EMPIRICAL RESPONSE SPECTRAL ATTENUATION LAWS FOR MODERATE EUROPEAN EARTHQUAKES , 2003 .

[10]  Enrico Zio INTEGRATED DETERMINISTIC AND PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS: CONCEPTS, CHALLENGES, RESEARCH DIRECTIONS , 2014 .

[11]  Aurore Laurendeau,et al.  Rock and Stiff‐Soil Site Amplification: Dependency on VS30 and Kappa (κ0) , 2013 .

[12]  M. Shinozuka,et al.  Simulation of Stochastic Processes by Spectral Representation , 1991 .

[13]  D. Clouteau,et al.  Equivalent linear substructure approximation of soil–foundation–structure interaction: model presentation and validation , 2010 .

[14]  D. Baumont,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment In the Upper Rhine Graben, Eastern France , 2014 .

[15]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment: Concepts, challenges, research directions , 2014 .

[16]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  Non‐intrusive global/local analysis for the study of fine cracking , 2013 .

[17]  David Néron,et al.  Virtual charts of solutions for parametrized nonlinear equations , 2014 .

[18]  John G. Anderson,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE SHAPE OF THE FOURIER AMPLITUDE SPECTRUM OF ACCELERATION AT HIGH FREQUENCIES , 1984 .

[19]  Panagiotis Kotronis,et al.  Prediction of Cracking in RC Walls Under Cyclic Loading by Means of a Novel Global Constitutive Model , 2016 .