The centrality of quality as a strategy to achieve impact within the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has been widely recognized. However, monitoring program quality remains a challenge for many HIV programs, particularly those in resource-limited settings, where human resource constraints and weaker health systems can pose formidable barriers to data collection and interpretation. We describe the practicalities of monitoring quality at scale within a very large multicountry PEPFAR-funded program, based largely at health facilities. The key elements include the following: supporting national programs and strategies; developing a conceptual framework and programmatic model to define quality and guide the provision of high-quality services; attending to program context, as well as program outcomes; leveraging existing and routinely collected data whenever possible; developing additional indicators for judicious use in targeted, in-depth assessments; providing hands-on support for data collection and use at the facility, sub-national, and national levels; utilizing web-based databases for data entry, analysis, and dissemination; and multidisciplinary support from a large team of clinical and strategic information advisors.
[1]
J. Heiby.
The use of modern quality improvement approaches to strengthen African health systems: a 5-year agenda.
,
2014,
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[2]
W. El-Sadr,et al.
The HIV care continuum: no partial credit given.
,
2012,
AIDS.
[3]
Lei Wang,et al.
Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.
,
2011,
The New England journal of medicine.
[4]
Denis Nash,et al.
Strategies for More Effective Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in HIV Programmatic Scale-Up in Resource-Limited Settings: Implications for Health Systems Strengthening
,
2009,
Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.
[5]
G. Oselka.
Prevenção da transmissão vertical do HIV
,
2001
.