Molecular bases of the acute coronary syndromes.

The acute coronary syndromes, including unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction, currently constitute a major preoccupation of clinical cardiology. This century has witnessed a remarkable evolution in our clinical concepts of these syndromes. Herrick1 described the survival of patients with acute coronary thrombosis early in the century. The introduction of the ECG led to major clinical advances in the definition of acute myocardial infarction during the first half of this century and furnished the basis of modern coronary care. In the latter half of this century, the advent of coronary arteriography permitted definition in the living patient of coronary stenoses due to atherosclerosis. The introduction of this diagnostic technique allowed the development of rational treatment modalities such as coronary artery bypass surgery and, subsequently, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Until recently, it seemed that we had achieved a firm understanding of the pathophysiology of human coronary artery disease and had devised appropriate modes of therapy for its major manifestations. Yet, recent clinical data suggest that we still have much to learn about the pathophysiology of the acute coronary syndromes. Bypass surgery and angioplasty aim to restore blood flow to sites beyond hemodynamically significant stenoses in the coronary arteries. These revascularization therapies effectively relieve angina pectoris in many cases (although often not permanently). Quite naturally, the availability of these modalities led the cardiology community to focus on high-grade coronary stenosis, visible by angiography, as the critical issue in coronary heart disease. Much of the basis of contemporary cardiology and cardiac surgery rests on the axiom: the greater the stenosis, the greater the risk of a clinical event such as myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris. However, data emerging from clinical and pathological studies over the past decade have occasioned a reassessment of this central dogma of clinical cardiology.2 First, the …