Building integral projection models: a user's guide

In order to understand how changes in individual performance (growth, survival or reproduction) influence population dynamics and evolution, ecologists are increasingly using parameterized mathematical models. For continuously structured populations, where some continuous measure of individual state influences growth, survival or reproduction, integral projection models (IPMs) are commonly used. We provide a detailed description of the steps involved in constructing an IPM, explaining how to: (i) translate your study system into an IPM; (ii) implement your IPM; and (iii) diagnose potential problems with your IPM. We emphasize how the study organism's life cycle, and the timing of censuses, together determine the structure of the IPM kernel and important aspects of the statistical analysis used to parameterize an IPM using data on marked individuals. An IPM based on population studies of Soay sheep is used to illustrate the complete process of constructing, implementing and evaluating an IPM fitted to sample data. We then look at very general approaches to parameterizing an IPM, using a wide range of statistical techniques (e.g. maximum likelihood methods, generalized additive models, nonparametric kernel density estimators). Methods for selecting models for parameterizing IPMs are briefly discussed. We conclude with key recommendations and a brief overview of applications that extend the basic model. The online Supporting Information provides commented R code for all our analyses.

[1]  Sophia Decker,et al.  Design And Analysis Of Ecological Experiments , 2016 .

[2]  Tim Coulson,et al.  Towards a general, population-level understanding of eco-evolutionary change. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Sean M. McMahon,et al.  IPMpack: an R package for integral projection models , 2013 .

[4]  Roland Langrock,et al.  MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF MARK-RECAPTURE-RECOVERY MODELS IN THE PRESENCE OF CONTINUOUS COVARIATES , 2012, 1211.0882.

[5]  A. Dawson Models for Forest Growth and Mortality: Linking Demography to Competition and Climate , 2013 .

[6]  Alison Leslie,et al.  Re-evaluating the effect of harvesting regimes on Nile crocodiles using an integral projection model. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  S. Engen,et al.  Effects of demographic structure on key properties of stochastic density-independent population dynamics. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  Tim Coulson,et al.  Integral projections models, their construction and use in posing hypotheses in ecology , 2012 .

[9]  Stephen P Ellner,et al.  Avoiding unintentional eviction from integral projection models. , 2012, Ecology.

[10]  A. Ozgul,et al.  Population Responses to Perturbations: The Importance of Trait-Based Analysis Illustrated through a Microcosm Experiment , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[11]  S. Townley,et al.  Global Asymptotic Stability of Density Dependent Integral Population Projection Models , 2022 .

[12]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Temporally variable dispersal and demography can accelerate the spread of invading species. , 2011, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  Tim Coulson,et al.  Modeling Effects of Environmental Change on Wolf Population Dynamics, Trait Evolution, and Life History , 2011, Science.

[14]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Predicting trait values and measuring selection in complex life histories: reproductive allocation decisions in Soay sheep. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[15]  Johan Ehrlén,et al.  Interdependent effects of habitat quality and climate on population growth of an endangered plant , 2011 .

[16]  Johan Ehrlén,et al.  Incorporating environmental change over succession in an integral projection model of population dynamics of a forest herb , 2011 .

[17]  Yngvild Vindenes,et al.  Integral projection models for finite populations in a stochastic environment. , 2011, Ecology.

[18]  Johan Ehrlén,et al.  Nonlinear relationships between vital rates and state variables in demographic models. , 2011, Ecology.

[19]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Impacts of aspergillosis on sea fan coral demography: modeling a moving target , 2011 .

[20]  S. Wood Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models , 2011 .

[21]  Katriona Shea,et al.  Importance of individual and environmental variation for invasive species spread: a spatial integral projection model. , 2011, Ecology.

[22]  M. Hooten,et al.  Climate influences the demography of three dominant sagebrush steppe plants. , 2011, Ecology.

[23]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Using evolutionary demography to link life history theory, quantitative genetics and population ecology , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  Eelke Jongejans,et al.  Size‐dependent flowering and costs of reproduction affect population dynamics in a tuberous perennial woodland orchid , 2010 .

[25]  Arpat Ozgul,et al.  Coupled dynamics of body mass and population growth in response to environmental change , 2010, Nature.

[26]  Stephen P Ellner,et al.  Coexistence of perennial plants: an embarrassment of niches. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[27]  Knut Rydgren,et al.  Investigating the interaction between ungulate grazing and resource effects on Vaccinium myrtillus populations with integral projection models , 2010, Oecologia.

[28]  Philip A. Stephens,et al.  Model selection and model averaging in behavioural ecology: the utility of the IT-AIC framework , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Integral projection models for populations in temporally varying environments , 2009 .

[30]  Mark Rees,et al.  Integral projection models perform better for small demographic data sets than matrix population models: a case study of two perennial herbs. , 2009 .

[31]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  A time to grow and a time to die: a new way to analyze the dynamics of size, light, age, and death of tropical trees. , 2009, Ecology.

[32]  Jennifer L. Williams Flowering Life‐History Strategies Differ between the Native and Introduced Ranges of a Monocarpic Perennial , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[33]  James O. Eckberg,et al.  Impacts of insect herbivory on cactus population dynamics: experimental demography across an environmental gradient , 2009 .

[34]  Mark Rees,et al.  Life‐History Variation in Contrasting Habitats: Flowering Decisions in a Clonal Perennial Herb (Veratrum album) , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[35]  M. Rees,et al.  Evolution of flowering decisions in a stochastic, density-dependent environment , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Evolutionary demography of long‐lived monocarpic perennials: a time‐lagged integral projection model , 2008 .

[37]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Stochastic stable population growth in integral projection models: theory and application , 2007, Journal of mathematical biology.

[38]  Jennifer L. Williams,et al.  The impact of invasive grasses on the population growth of Anemone patens, a long-lived native forb. , 2006, Ecology.

[39]  Mark Rees,et al.  Seed Dormancy and Delayed Flowering in Monocarpic Plants: Selective Interactions in a Stochastic Environment , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[40]  W. D. Walter Soay Sheep: Dynamics and Selection in an Island Population , 2006 .

[41]  S. Ellner,et al.  Integral Projection Models for Species with Complex Demography , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[42]  M. Rees,et al.  DEMOGRAPHIC AND EVOLUTIONARY IMPACTS OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE INSECT HERBIVORES ON CIRSIUM CANESCENS , 2005 .

[43]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Evolution of size–dependent flowering in a variable environment: construction and analysis of a stochastic integral projection model , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Evolution of complex flowering strategies: an age– and size–structured integral projection model , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  M. Rees,et al.  Evolution of flowering strategies in Oenothera glazioviana: an integral projection model approach , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  S. Ellner,et al.  SIZE‐SPECIFIC SENSITIVITY: APPLYING A NEW STRUCTURED POPULATION MODEL , 2000 .

[47]  K. Abromeit Music Received , 2023, Notes.

[48]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Demography of an Age-Structured Annual: Resampled Projection Matrices, Elasticity Analyses, and Seed Bank Effects , 1992 .

[49]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[50]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .