Feasibility study to optimize a near-surface sensor network design for improving detectability of CO2 leakage at a geologic storage site

Abstract We explored the feasibility of an improved design of a CO2 leakage monitoring network at a geologic storage site. To effectively represent CO2 pathways, a rule-based percolation model was adopted rather than the rigorous multiphase flow model based on Darcy’s equation. Five different monitoring network designs were compared using a few scenarios and multiple correlated random field realizations. The ensemble results showed that given the detection uncertainty across the entire sensor network, regular spacing deployment of sensors is the most effective method when a sufficient number of sensors is available. The results also showed that an aggressive monitoring design based on information of the spatial permeability distribution near the surface can be a viable method when a limited number of sensors is employed. However, such an aggressive design can lead to elevated uncertainty in leakage detectability.

[1]  Michael A. Celia,et al.  Multiphase Modeling of Geologic Carbon Sequestration in Saline Aquifers , 2015, Ground water.

[2]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Buoyancy-Dominated Multiphase Flow and Its Effect on Geological Sequestration of CO2 , 2008 .

[3]  H. Yoon,et al.  Comparison of Darcy's law and invasion percolation simulations with buoyancy-driven CO2-brine multiphase flow in a heterogeneous sandstone core , 2017 .

[4]  Eungyu Park,et al.  Evaluation of an upscaled model for DNAPL dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers , 2005 .

[5]  Rajesh J. Pawar,et al.  Geologic CO2 sequestration monitoring design: A machine learning and uncertainty quantification based approach , 2018, Applied Energy.

[6]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  The role of optimality in characterizing CO2 seepage from geological carbon sequestration sites , 2007 .

[7]  Eungyu Park,et al.  Modeling field‐scale dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers , 2004 .

[8]  R. Stuart Haszeldine,et al.  The Sleipner storage site: Capillary flow modeling of a layered CO2 plume requires fractured shale barriers within the Utsira Formation , 2014 .

[9]  C. Oldenburg,et al.  On the use of Darcy's law and invasion‐percolation approaches for modeling large‐scale geologic carbon sequestration , 2016 .

[10]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Risk-based Monitoring Network Design for Geologic Carbon Storage Sites , 2017 .

[11]  S. Bryant,et al.  Characterization and prediction of CO2 saturation resulting from modeling buoyant fluid migration in 2D heterogeneous geologic fabrics , 2015 .

[12]  S. Bryant,et al.  New Trapping Mechanism in Carbon Sequestration , 2010 .

[13]  A. Cavanagh,et al.  Benchmark Calibration and Prediction of the Sleipner CO2 Plume from 2006 to 2012 , 2013 .

[14]  Alexander Y. Sun,et al.  Optimal design of pressure-based, leakage detection monitoring networks for geologic carbon sequestration repositories , 2013 .

[15]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Probabilistic design of a near-surface CO2 leak detection system. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  R. Carsel,et al.  Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics , 1988 .

[17]  Katherine D. Romanak,et al.  Process‐based approach to CO2 leakage detection by vadose zone gas monitoring at geologic CO2 storage sites , 2012 .

[18]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1998 .

[19]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Assessing leakage detectability at geologic CO2 sequestration sites using the probabilistic collocation method , 2013 .

[20]  Jan M. Nordbotten,et al.  Vertical equilibrium with sub-scale analytical methods for geological CO2 sequestration , 2009 .

[21]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[22]  Julia M. West,et al.  Developments since 2005 in understanding potential environmental impacts of CO2 leakage from geological storage , 2015 .