A reexamination of the concurrent discrimination learning task: the importance of anterior inferotemporal cortex, area TE.

For 30 years, the concurrent discrimination learning task has figured prominently in studies used to determine the effects of medial temporal lobe damage in monkeys. However, the findings from these studies have been contradictory. We explored the contribution to concurrent discrimination performance of inadvertent damage to area TE by reexamining the behavioral data and histological material from monkeys with medial temporal lobe lesions previously tested in our laboratory. The amount of inadvertent damage to area TE was more predictive of impaired performance on the concurrent discrimination learning task than was the amount of damage to any medial temporal lobe structure, including the perirhinal cortex. These findings resolve earlier inconsistent findings regarding the concurrent discrimination learning task by demonstrating that performance on this task depends on area TE and not on perirhinal cortex or other medial temporal lobe structures.

[1]  S. Zola-Morgan,et al.  Hippocampal resections impair associative learning and recognition memory in the monkey , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  Pattern recognition mechanisms , 1985 .

[3]  S. Zola-Morgan,et al.  Comparative neuropsychology and Korsakoff's syndrome. II—Two-choice visual discrimination learning , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Orbach,et al.  Learning and retention in monkeys after amygdala-hippocampus resection. , 1960, Archives of neurology.

[5]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Dissociation of the effects of inferior temporal and limbic lesions on object discrimination learning with 24-h intertrial intervals , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: I. Cytoarchitectonic organization , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  M. Mishkin,et al.  The neuroanatomy of amnesia: amygdala-hippocampus versus temporal stem. , 1982, Science.

[8]  S. Zola-Morgan,et al.  Concurrent discrimination learning of monkeys after hippocampal, entorhinal, or fornix lesions , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  M Mishkin,et al.  Long-term effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on learning and memory in monkeys. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Impairment of visual object-discrimination learning after perirhinal cortex ablation. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Society for Neuroscience Abstracts , 1997 .

[12]  Louis W. Gellermann Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .

[13]  W. Suzuki,et al.  Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between the monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Impairment of visual object-discrimination learning after perirhinal cortex ablation. , 1997 .

[15]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals. , 1984 .

[17]  W. Scoville,et al.  Relationship of ITI to acquistion of serial visual discriminations following temporal rhinencephalic resection in monkeys. , 1970, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[18]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  Larry R. Squire,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – THE NEUROLOGY OF MEMORY: THE CASE FOR CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN THE FINDINGS FOR HUMAN AND NONHUMAN PRIMATE1 , 1983 .

[20]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Murray,et al.  Rhinal Cortex Removal Produces Amnesia for Preoperatively Learned Discrimination Problems But Fails to Disrupt Postoperative Acquisition and Retention in Rhesus Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  L. Squire,et al.  Enduring memory impairment in monkeys after ischemic damage to the hippocampus , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  W. Scoville,et al.  Effects of medial temporal lesions on visual discrimination performance. , 1965, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  M. Mishkin A memory system in the monkey. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  L R Squire,et al.  Lesions of the hippocampal formation but not lesions of the fornix or the mammillary nuclei produce long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  L. Squire,et al.  Preserved learning in monkeys with medial temporal lesions: sparing of motor and cognitive skills , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Amaral,et al.  Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: Cortical afferents , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  Ellen Covey,et al.  Cortical Visual Areas of the Macaque: Possible Substrates for Pattern Recognition Mechanisms , 1985 .

[29]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[30]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Stimulus recognition , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  E. Murray,et al.  Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[33]  J A Deutsch,et al.  The physiological basis of memory. , 1969, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: III. Subcortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[35]  Wendy A Suzuki,et al.  The anatomy, physiology and functions of the perirhinal cortex , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  P Alvarez,et al.  Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  L. Squire,et al.  The medial temporal lobe memory system , 1991, Science.

[38]  L. Squire,et al.  Damage to the perirhinal cortex exacerbates memory impairment following lesions to the hippocampal formation , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  G. Bonin,et al.  The neocortex of Macaca mulatta , 1947 .

[41]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[42]  Elisabeth A. Murray,et al.  What have ablation studies told us about the neural substrates of stimulus memory , 1996 .

[43]  L. Squire,et al.  Human amnesia and animal models of amnesia: performance of amnesic patients on tests designed for the monkey. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[44]  L. Squire,et al.  Medial temporal lesions in monkeys impair memory on a variety of tasks sensitive to human amnesia. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  H. Harlow,et al.  A test-apparatus for monkeys , 1938 .

[47]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  A Neostriatal Habit Learning System in Humans , 1996, Science.

[48]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[50]  Seth J. Ramus,et al.  Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system , 1994, Hippocampus.

[51]  L. Squire,et al.  Lesions of the amygdala that spare adjacent cortical regions do not impair memory or exacerbate the impairment following lesions of the hippocampal formation , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.