Using Accelerated Life Tests Results to Predict Product Field Reliability

Accelerated life tests (ALTs) provide timely assessments of the reliability of materials, components, and subsystems. ALTs can be run at any of these levels or at the full-system level. Sometimes ALTs generate multiple failure modes. A frequently asked question near the end of an ALT program is “what do these test results say about field performance?” ALTs are carefully controlled, whereas the field environment is highly variable. For example, products in the field have different average use rates across the product population. With good characterization of field use conditions, it may be possible to use ALT results to predict the failure time distribution in the field. When such information is not available but both life test data and field data (from, e.g., warranty returns) are available, it may be possible to find a model to relate the two data sets. Under a reasonable set of practical assumptions, this model then can be used to predict the failure time distribution for a future component or product operating in the same use environment. This paper describes a model and methods for such situations. The methods are illustrated by an example to predict the failure time distribution of a newly designed product with two failure modes. Supplemental material for this article is available online at the Technometrics website.

[1]  I. Gertsbakh,et al.  Choice of the best time scale for system reliability analysis , 1993 .

[2]  Lloyd W. Condra,et al.  Reliability improvement with design of experiments , 1993 .

[3]  Wayne Nelson,et al.  Ch. 22. Prediction of field reliability of units, each under differing dynamic stresses, from accelerated test data , 2001 .

[4]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1999 .

[5]  Joseph D. Conklin Classical Competing Risks , 2002, Technometrics.

[6]  Ewan Macarthur,et al.  Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analysis , 1990 .

[7]  Sigmund J. Amster,et al.  Report: Statistical methods for reliability improvement , 1986, AT&T Technical Journal.

[8]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  A Review of Accelerated Test Models , 2006, 0708.0369.

[9]  H. A. David The theory of competing risks , 1980 .

[10]  A. Nadas,et al.  The Distribution of the Identified Minimum of a Normal Pair Determines the Distribution of the Pair , 1971 .

[11]  Guangbin Yang,et al.  Accelerated life tests at higher usage rates , 2005, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[12]  T Duchesne,et al.  Alternative Time Scales and Failure Time Models , 2000, Lifetime data analysis.

[13]  Z. Zaghati,et al.  Accelerated life tests at higher usage rates: a case study , 2006, RAMS '06. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006..

[14]  Sagnik Sinha,et al.  A use-rate based failure model for two-dimensional warranty , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Henry W. Altland Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization , 2001, Technometrics.

[16]  Nozer D. Singpurwalla,et al.  Survival in Dynamic Environments , 1995 .

[17]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Reliability Improvement with Design of Experiments , 2002, Technometrics.

[18]  D Oakes,et al.  Multiple time scales in survival analysis , 1995, Lifetime data analysis.

[19]  W. Meeker Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analyses , 1991 .

[20]  Jayanta K. Ghosh,et al.  Identifiability of the multinormal and other distributions under competing risks model , 1978 .

[21]  H. A. David,et al.  The Theory of Competing Risks. , 1979 .

[22]  C. F. Jeff Wu,et al.  Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization , 2000 .

[23]  W. Nelson Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1998 .