A review of information systems evaluation: content, context and process

Computer-based information systems are difficult to evaluate. The difficulties are both conceptual (what should be involved in evaluation) and operational (how to carry out evaluation). Information systems evaluation is generally taken to mean the identification and quantification of the costs and benefits of an IT investment. We maintain that this approach is too narrow, and hence problematic. A broader conceptualisation is set out, which entails management of the linkages between content, context and process: the ‘what’, ‘why’ and ‘how’ of evaluation. A categorisation of the IS evaluation literature according to its emphasis on content/context/process is used to argue that effective evaluation requires a thorough understanding of the interactions between these three elements. Implications for the practice of IS evaluation are drawn out.

[1]  G. Schäfer,et al.  Functional analysis of office requirements: a multiperspective approach , 1988 .

[2]  David Copp,et al.  Morality, Reason, and Management Science: The Rationale of Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1985, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[3]  Peter G. Sassone,et al.  Cost-justifying OA , 1986 .

[4]  James W. Fairfield-Sonn,et al.  The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI. , 1987 .

[5]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[6]  J. D. Eveland,et al.  CONCEPTUALIZING THE GOAL AND SYSTEM MODELS OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS —IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPARATIVE EVALUATION RESEARCH , 1981 .

[7]  M. Parker,et al.  Information Economics: Linking Business Performance to Information Technology , 1988 .

[8]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[9]  J. Rockart Chief executives define their own data needs. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[10]  William R. King,et al.  Evaluating Management Informatoin Systems , 1978, MIS Q..

[11]  Ananth Srinivasan,et al.  Alternative Measures of Systems Effectiveness: Associations and Implications , 1985, MIS Q..

[12]  John Leslie King,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis in Information Systems Development and Operation , 1978, CSUR.

[13]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness - Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches , 1981, MIS Q..

[14]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  People and computers: how to evaluate your company's new technology , 1988 .

[15]  Peter G. Sassone,et al.  A survey of cost-benefit methodologies for information systems , 1988 .

[16]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Dependent Variables for the Study of Firm and Industry-Level Impacts of Information Technology , 2013, ICIS.

[17]  P G Keen,et al.  Computer-based decision aids: the evaluation problem. , 2011, Sloan management review.

[18]  J. Miller,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Computer-Based Information Systems in the Financial Services Sector , 1987, MIS Q..

[19]  Kim Halskov Madsen,et al.  Information Systems Assessment as a Learning Process , 1988 .

[20]  Andrew Goddard,et al.  Are three “E”s enough? , 1989 .

[21]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Decision support systems : an organizational perspective , 1978 .

[22]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness - Part II: Comparing Evaluator Viewpoints , 1981, MIS Q..

[23]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[24]  John Mingers,et al.  Problems of Measurement , 1989 .