A deformable body dynamic analysis of planetary gears with thin rims

Planetary gear sets are used commonly by automotive and aerospace industries. Typical applications include jet propulsion systems, rotorcraft transmissions, passenger vehicle automatic transmissions and transfer cases and off-highway vehicle gearboxes. Their high-power-density design combined with their kinematic flexibility in achieving different speed ratios make planetary gears sets often preferable to counter-shaft gear reduction systems. As planetary gear sets possess unique kinematic and geometric properties, they require specialized design knowledge [1]. One type of the key parameters, the rim thickness of the gears, must be defined carefully by the designer in order to meet certain design objectives regarding power density, planet load sharing, noise and durability. From the power density point of view, the rim of the each gear forming the planetary gear set must be as thin as possible in order to minimize mass. Besides reducing mass, added gear flexibility through reduced rim thickness was shown to reduce the influence of a number of internal gear and carrier errors, and piloting inaccuracies [2]. In addition, it was also reported that a flexible internal gear helps improve the load sharing amongst the planets when a number of manufacturing and assembly related gear and carrier errors are present [3–6]. Many of these effects of flexible gear rims were quantified under quasi-static conditions in the absence of any dynamic effects. The effect of rim thickness on gear stresses attracted significant attention in the past. A number of theoretical studies [7–14] modelled mostly a segment of spur gear with a thin rim. In these studies, the gear segment was typically constrained using certain boundary conditions at the cut ends and a point load along the line of action was applied to a single tooth in order to simulate the forces imposed on a sun or an internal gear by the mating planet. This segment of the gear was modelled by using the conventional finite element (FE) method with the same boundary conditions applied in order to simulate the actual support conditions. These models do not

[1]  Ahmet Kahraman,et al.  Static Load Sharing Characteristics of Transmission Planetary Gear Sets: Model and Experiment , 1999 .

[2]  Ahmet Kahraman,et al.  GUDA-1 INFLUENCE OF CARRIER AND GEAR MANUFACTURING ERRORS ON THE STATIC PLANET LOAD SHARING BEHAVIOR OF PLANETARY GEAR SETS(GEAR UNIT DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS) , 2001 .

[3]  Teruaki Hidaka,et al.  Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gear : 3rd Report, Displacement of Ring Gear in Direction of Line of Action , 1977 .

[4]  Sandeep M. Vijayakar,et al.  Effect of Internal Gear Flexibility on the Quasi-Static Behavior of a Planetary Gear Set , 2001 .

[5]  M. Savage,et al.  Effects of rim thickness on spur gear bending stress , 1991 .

[6]  A. P,et al.  Mechanical Vibrations , 1948, Nature.

[7]  Satoshi Oda,et al.  Root Stress of Thin-Rimmed Internal Spur Gear Supported with Pins : Vibration, Control Engineering, Engineering for Industry , 1987 .

[8]  Ahmet Kahraman,et al.  Planetary gear train dynamics , 1994 .

[9]  Robert G. Parker,et al.  NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A SPUR GEAR PAIR: MODELLING AND EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISONS , 2000 .

[10]  Aizoh Kubo,et al.  Simple Stress Formulae for a Thin-Rimmed Spur Gear. Part 2: Tooth Fillet and Root Stress Calculation of a Thin-Rimmed Internal Spur Gear , 1985 .

[11]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Dynamic Tooth Loads in Epicyclic Gears , 1974 .

[12]  Timothy L. Krantz Gear Tooth Stress Measurements of Two Helicopter Planetary Stages , 1992 .

[13]  Kazuteru Nagamura,et al.  Dynamic Behavior of Planetary Gear : 7th Report, Influence of the Thickness of the Ring Gear , 1978 .

[14]  Aizoh Kubo,et al.  Simple Stress Formulae for a Thin-Rimmed Spur Gear. Part 3: Examination of the Calculation Method and Stress State of Internal Spur Gear , 1985 .

[15]  M. Botman Vibration Measurements on Planetary Gears of Aircraft Turbine Engines , 1980 .

[16]  S. Vijayakar A combined surface integral and finite element solution for a three‐dimensional contact problem , 1991 .

[17]  Mark J. Valco Planetary gear train ring gear and support structure investigation , 1992 .

[18]  Satoshi Oda,et al.  Root stress of thin-rimmed internal spur gear supported with pins. , 1986 .

[19]  J. J. Coy,et al.  A finite element stress analysis of spur gears including fillet radii and rim thickness effects , 1983 .