Active SAmpling Protocol (ASAP) to Optimize Individual Neurocognitive Hypothesis Testing: A BCI-Inspired Dynamic Experimental Design

The relatively young field of Brain-Computer Interfaces has promoted the use of electrophysiology and neuroimaging in real-time. In the meantime, cognitive neuroscience studies, which make extensive use of functional exploration techniques, have evolved toward model-based experiments and fine hypothesis testing protocols. Although these two developments are mostly unrelated, we argue that, brought together, they may trigger an important shift in the way experimental paradigms are being designed, which should prove fruitful to both endeavors. This change simply consists in using real-time neuroimaging in order to optimize advanced neurocognitive hypothesis testing. We refer to this new approach as the instantiation of an Active SAmpling Protocol (ASAP). As opposed to classical (static) experimental protocols, ASAP implements online model comparison, enabling the optimization of design parameters (e.g., stimuli) during the course of data acquisition. This follows the well-known principle of sequential hypothesis testing. What is radically new, however, is our ability to perform online processing of the huge amount of complex data that brain imaging techniques provide. This is all the more relevant at a time when physiological and psychological processes are beginning to be approached using more realistic, generative models which may be difficult to tease apart empirically. Based upon Bayesian inference, ASAP proposes a generic and principled way to optimize experimental design adaptively. In this perspective paper, we summarize the main steps in ASAP. Using synthetic data we illustrate its superiority in selecting the right perceptual model compared to a classical design. Finally, we briefly discuss its future potential for basic and clinical neuroscience as well as some remaining challenges.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Observing the Observer (I): Meta-Bayesian Models of Learning and Decision-Making , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  Christoforos Anagnostopoulos,et al.  The Automatic Neuroscientist: A framework for optimizing experimental design with closed-loop real-time fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Brain-Machine Interfaces beyond Neuroprosthetics , 2015, Neuron.

[4]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Bayesian adaptive model selection for optimizing group sequential clinical trials , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Robert J. Butera,et al.  Sequential Optimal Design of Neurophysiology Experiments , 2009, Neural Computation.

[6]  Daniel J Mitchell,et al.  Seeing different objects in different ways: Measuring ventral visual tuning to sensory and semantic features with dynamically adaptive imaging , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[7]  José del R. Millán,et al.  BNCI Horizon 2020: Towards a Roadmap for the BCI Community , 2015 .

[8]  Jay I. Myung,et al.  A Tutorial on Adaptive Design Optimization. , 2013, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[9]  Lionel Rigoux,et al.  VBA: A Probabilistic Treatment of Nonlinear Models for Neurobiological and Behavioural Data , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Kerstin Preuschoff,et al.  Optimizing Experimental Design for Comparing Models of Brain Function , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Dynamic causal models of steady-state responses , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  Tuomas J. Lukka,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation: The next dimension , 2006 .

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Preserved Feedforward But Impaired Top-Down Processes in the Vegetative State , 2011, Science.

[14]  Jérémie Mattout,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Neuroscience Paradigm of Social Interaction? A Matter of Perspective , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses , 2008, NeuroImage.

[16]  Stefan J. Kiebel,et al.  Evidence for neural encoding of Bayesian surprise in human somatosensation , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  A Hierarchical Adaptive Approach to Optimal Experimental Design , 2014, Neural Computation.

[18]  Mark W Woolrich,et al.  Associative learning of social value , 2008, Nature.

[19]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Implicit learning of predictable sound sequences modulates human brain responses at different levels of the auditory hierarchy , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain–machine interfaces , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  J J Vidal,et al.  Toward direct brain-computer communication. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[22]  Rick A Adams,et al.  Computational Psychiatry: towards a mathematically informed understanding of mental illness , 2015, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[23]  Emmanuel Maby,et al.  Toward a New Application of Real-Time Electrophysiology: Online Optimization of Cognitive Neurosciences Hypothesis Testing , 2014, Brain sciences.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics: current state and future extensions , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[25]  Karl J. Friston Modalities, Modes, and Models in Functional Neuroimaging , 2009, Science.

[26]  M. Congedo,et al.  The Riemannian Potato: an automatic and adaptive artifact detection method for online experiments using Riemannian geometry , 2013 .

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Real-time neuroimaging and cognitive monitoring using wearable dry EEG , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Uncertainty in perception and the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  William D. Penny,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Causal Models using AIC, BIC and Free Energy , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Action understanding and active inference , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.