Object recognition is mediated by extraretinal information

Many previous studies of object recognition have found view-dependent recognition performance when view changes are produced by rotating objects relative to a stationary viewing position. However, the assumption that an object rotation is equivalent to an observer viewpoint change ignores the potential contribution of extraretinal information that accompanies observer movement. In four experiments, we investigated the role of extraretinal information on real-world object recognition. As in previous studies focusing on the recognition of spatial layouts across view changes, observers performed better in an old/new object recognition task when view changes were caused by viewer movement than when they were caused by object rotation. This difference between viewpoint and orientation changes was due not to the visual background, but to the extraretinal information available during real observer movements. Models of object recognition need to consider other information available to an observer in addition to the retinal projection in order to fully understand object recognition in the real world.

[1]  T. McNamara,et al.  Multiple views of spatial memory , 1997 .

[2]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  E. Spelke,et al.  Spatial knowledge in a young blind child , 1984, Cognition.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  J. Rieser,et al.  Young Children's Spatial Orientation with Respect to Multiple Targets When Walking without Vision. , 1991 .

[9]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[10]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[11]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[13]  K Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. , 1993, Science.

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[15]  Martin J. Farrell,et al.  Mental Rotation and the Automatic Updating of Body-Centered Spatial Relationships , 1998 .

[16]  J. Rieser.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[18]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Active and passive scene recognition across views , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[20]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[21]  S. Ullman.  Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[22]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[23]  Michael J. Tarr.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .

[24]  G. Humphrey,et al.  Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[25]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[26]  I Biederman,et al.  Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  C. Gallistel.  The organization of learning , 1990 .

[29]  I. Rock,et al.  A case of viewer-centered object perception , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  I. Biederman,et al.  Evidence for Complete Translational and Reflectional Invariance in Visual Object Priming , 1991, Perception.

[32]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes , 1998 .

[33]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Searching behaviour of desert ants, genusCataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[34]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.