Identification of damage parameters during flood events applicable to multi-span bridges

During flood events, the dynamic interaction between flowing water and bridges generates random loadings that force bridges to vibrate in all six degrees of freedom. It is difficult for a structural damage detection method to select a degree of freedom, or damage feature, to accurately describe and predict damage. The methodology presented here identifies damage-sensitive features and uses them to monitor bridge health. A small-scale physical model of a multi-span highway bridge was constructed to satisfy geometrical, Cauchy, and Froude similarities, and six-dimensional hydrodynamic forces induced by simulated flood events were investigated as an input excitation in a tilting flume. It was determined that pitch, roll, and surge motions can be used as damage features during the inundated stage, while pitch, roll, surge, and heave can be used before the inundated stage. In addition, angular velocity signals exhibited more consistent damage indices than acceleration. Using the damage features, the proposed algorithm could successfully detect damage and damage severity during simulated flood stages. Identifying damage features can reduce the size of the collected data and inform emergency responders’ decisions. This case study can be used to test methods at full scale on similar structures to develop automated health-monitoring systems.

[1]  Luke J. Prendergast,et al.  A review of bridge scour monitoring techniques , 2014 .

[2]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  Dynamic hydroelastic scaling of self-adaptive composite marine rotors , 2010 .

[3]  Mariano Angelo Zanini,et al.  Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: Case study on transport assets. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  S. Rahmatalla,et al.  Transmissibility-based damage detection using angular velocity versus acceleration , 2018, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring.

[5]  Salam Rahmatalla,et al.  Damage detection of retrofitted crack re-initiation and growth , 2015 .

[6]  Aaron Henry Wave forces on bridge decks and damping techniques to reduce damages , 2011 .

[7]  Namgyu Kim,et al.  Finite element model updating considering boundary conditions using neural networks , 2017 .

[8]  F. C. Hadipriono,et al.  ANALYSIS OF RECENT BRIDGE FAILURES IN THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[9]  Salam Rahmatalla,et al.  Crack detection and health monitoring of highway steel-girder bridges , 2015 .

[10]  Hee-Chang Eun,et al.  Finite element modal analysis and vibration-waveforms in health inspection of old bridges , 2014 .

[11]  S. Rahmatalla,et al.  Damage detection in structures using angular velocity , 2017 .

[12]  Guoji Xu,et al.  Prediction of Solitary Wave Forces on Coastal Bridge Decks Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2018 .

[13]  Rob Lamb,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of the Economic Risk to Britain's Railway Network from Bridge Scour During Floods , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Assessing flood probability for transportation infrastructure based on catchment characteristics, sediment connectivity and remotely sensed soil moisture. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Guoji Xu,et al.  Numerical investigation of the lateral restraining stiffness effect on the bridge deck-wave interaction under Stokes waves , 2017 .

[16]  Jie-min Zhan,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Wave Forces on Movable Bridge Decks , 2016 .

[17]  Matúš Bakoň,et al.  Potential of Multi-temporal InSAR Techniques for Bridges and Dams Monitoring , 2014 .

[18]  Hui Li,et al.  Analytical solution of hurricane wave forces acting on submerged bridge decks , 2015 .

[19]  Harry G. Harris,et al.  Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques, Second Edition , 1999 .

[20]  Anders Brandt,et al.  Noise and Vibration Analysis: Signal Analysis and Experimental Procedures , 2011 .

[21]  Amobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu,et al.  Flood susceptibility modeling and hazard perception in Rwanda , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[22]  Cristian Rossi,et al.  Remote monitoring to predict bridge scour failure using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) stacking techniques , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[23]  Haihong Zhao,et al.  Hydrodynamic Investigation of Coastal Bridge Collapse during Hurricane Katrina , 2009 .

[24]  Carlos E. Ventura,et al.  Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis: Brincker/Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis , 2015 .

[25]  Jinping Ou,et al.  Experimental Study of the Hydrodynamic Responses of a Bridge Tower to Waves and Wave Currents , 2017 .

[26]  Richard N. White,et al.  Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques , 1999 .

[27]  A.S.J. Swamidas,et al.  Similarity method for modelling hydroelastic offshore platforms , 1996 .

[28]  Genda Chen,et al.  Characterization and field validation of smart rocks for bridge scour monitoring , 2019, Structural Health Monitoring.

[29]  Elena Ciappi,et al.  Hydrodynamic and hydroelastic analyses of a plate excited by the turbulent boundary layer , 2009 .

[30]  A. Yanmaz,et al.  Development of a Safety-Inspection Method for River Bridges in Turkey , 2019, Water.

[31]  H. Ronald Riggs,et al.  Lessons from Hurricane Katrina Storm Surge on Bridges and Buildings , 2007 .

[32]  Rudolf Seracino,et al.  Rapid assessment of foundation scour using the dynamic features of bridge superstructure , 2014 .

[33]  V. Heller,et al.  Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models , 2011 .

[34]  Bo Meng,et al.  Computation of wave loads on the superstructures of coastal highway bridges , 2011 .

[35]  P. R. Thyla,et al.  Establishment of structural similitude for elastic models and validation of scaling laws , 2013 .

[36]  Carlos E. Ventura,et al.  Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis , 2015 .

[37]  P. Omenzetter,et al.  Experimental ambient vibration-based structural health monitoring in top-tensioned risers , 2018, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[38]  Young-Soo Park,et al.  Evaluation of bridge support condition using bridge responses , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[39]  Tatsuo Ohmachi,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Tsunami Force on Bridge Decks , 2011 .

[40]  P. Kirshen,et al.  Hierarchical Approach for Assessing the Vulnerability of Roads and Bridges to Flooding in Massachusetts , 2020 .

[41]  Luke J. Prendergast,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring for Performance Assessment of Bridges under Flooding and Seismic Actions , 2018, Structural Engineering International.

[42]  Ting Bao,et al.  Vibration‐based bridge scour detection: A review , 2017 .

[43]  L. Duan,et al.  Experimental and numerical modelling of wave forces on coastal bridge superstructures with box girders, Part I: Regular waves , 2018 .

[44]  T. Harms,et al.  An embedded wireless system for remote monitoring of bridges , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[45]  M. Azadbakht,et al.  Simulation and Estimation of Tsunami Loads on Bridge Superstructures , 2015 .