Design considerations for neutron activation and neutron source strength monitors for ITER

The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor1 will require highly accurate measurements of fusion power production in time, space, and energy. Spectrometers in the neutron camera could do it all, but experience has taught us that multiple methods with redundancy and complementary uncertainties are needed. Previously, conceptual designs have been presented for time-integrated neutron activation2 and time-dependent neutron source strength monitors3, both of which will be important parts of the integrated suite of neutron diagnostics for this purpose.4 The primary goals of the neutron activation system are: to maintain a robust relative measure of fusion energy production with stability and wide dynamic range; to enable an accurate absolute calibration of fusion power using neutronic techniques as successfully demonstrated on JET5 and TFTR67; and to provide a flexible system for materials testing. The greatest difficulty is that the irradiation locations need to be close to plasma with a wide field of view. The routing of the pneumatic system is difficult because of minimum radius of curvature requirements and because of the careful need for containment of the tritium and activated air. The neutron source strength system needs to provide real-time source strength vs time with ∼1 ms resolution and wide dynamic range in a robust and reliable manner with the capability to be absolutely calibrated by in-situ neutron sources as done on TFTR8, JT-60U9, and JET10. In this paper a more detailed look at the expected neutron flux field around 1TER is folded into a more complete design of the fission chamber system. Overall issues of neutron calibration for ITER will be presented elsewhere11.

[1]  C. Barnes,et al.  In situ calibration of TFTR neutron detectors , 1990 .

[2]  C. Barnes,et al.  Absolute calibration of the JT‐60U neutron monitors using a 252Cf neutron sourcea) , 1992 .

[3]  C. Barnes,et al.  Overview of Fusion Product Diagnostics for ITER , 1998 .

[4]  C. Walker,et al.  In-Vessel Neutron Monitor Using Micro Fission Chambers for ITER , 2001 .

[5]  C. Barnes,et al.  Scintillating‐fiber 14 MeV neutron detector on TFTR during DT operation , 1995 .

[6]  O. N. Jarvis,et al.  Numerical Study of the Calibration Factors for the Neutron Counters in Use at the Joint European Torus , 1993 .

[7]  A. V. Krasilnikov,et al.  TFTR natural diamond detectors based D–T neutron spectrometry system , 1997 .

[8]  A. Roquemore,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF 14 MEV NEUTRONS AT TFTR WITH SI-DIODE DETECTORS , 1995 .

[9]  C. Barnes,et al.  Calculations of neutron activation response for the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor and absolute calibrations of neutron yield , 1996 .

[10]  C. Barnes,et al.  Conceptual design for a scintillating‐fiber neutron detector for fusion reactor plasma diagnostics , 1995 .

[11]  Mario Pillon,et al.  Calibration of neutron yield activation measurements at JET using MCNP and FURNACE neutron transport codes , 1989 .

[12]  V. A. Zagryadskii,et al.  Calculated neutron transport verifications by integral 14 MeV-neutron source experiments with multiplying assemblies , 1989 .

[13]  C. Barnes,et al.  Neutron source strength monitors for ITER , 1996 .

[14]  A. E. Costley,et al.  Diagnostics Access for ITER , 1998 .

[15]  C. Barnes,et al.  Neutron activation for ITER , 1996 .

[16]  E. Takada,et al.  Design of radial neutron spectrometer array for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor , 1997 .

[17]  C. Barnes,et al.  Cross-calibration of neutron detectors for deuterium-tritium operation in TFTR , 1995 .

[18]  A. V. Krasilnikov,et al.  Fusion Neutronic Source deuterium–tritium neutron spectrum measurements using natural diamond detectors , 1997 .

[19]  P. E. Stott,et al.  The ITER Device , 1996 .