Quantification of emotion by nonlinear analysis of the chaotic dynamics of electroencephalograms during perception of 1/f music

Abstract. The goal of this study is to quantify and determine the way in which the emotional response to music is reflected in the electrical activities of the brain. When the power spectrum of sequences of musical notes is inversely proportional to the frequency on a log-log plot, we call it 1/f music. According to previous research, most listeners agree that 1/f music is much more pleasing than white (1/f0) or brown (1/f2) music. Based on these studies, we used nonlinear methods to investigate the chaotic dynamics of electroencephalograms (EEGs) elicited by computer-generated 1/f music, white music, and brown music. In this analysis, we used the correlation dimension and the largest Lyapunov exponent as measures of complexity and chaos. We developed a new method that is strikingly faster and more accurate than other algorithms for calculating the nonlinear invariant measures from limited noisy data. At the right temporal lobe, 1/f music elicited lower values of both the correlation dimension and the largest Lyapunov exponent than white or brown music. We observed that brains which feel more pleased show decreased chaotic electrophysiological behavior. By observing that the nonlinear invariant measures for the 1/f distribution of the rhythm with the melody kept constant are lower than those for the 1/f distribution of melody with the rhythm kept constant, we could conclude that the rhythm variations contribute much more to a pleasing response to music than the melody variations do. These results support the assumption that chaos plays an important role in brain function, especially emotion.

[1]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors , 1985 .

[2]  J. Bharucha,et al.  Music Perception and Cognition Following Bilateral Lesions of Auditory Cortex , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[4]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[5]  Christopher Essex,et al.  Chaotic time series analyses of epileptic seizures , 1990 .

[6]  Theiler,et al.  Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[7]  Leonard A. Smith.  Intrinsic limits on dimension calculations , 1988 .

[8]  Theodore R. Bashore,et al.  Experimental Studies of Chaotic Neural Behavior: Cellular Activity and Electroencephalographic Signals , 1986 .

[9]  Jan Klaschka,et al.  Modification of the Grassberger-Procaccia algorithm for estimating the correlation exponent of chaotic systems with high embedding dimension , 1990 .

[10]  A. Wolf,et al.  Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series , 1985 .

[11]  R. Voss,et al.  ‘1/fnoise’ in music and speech , 1975, Nature.

[12]  J. Röschke,et al.  The EEG is not a simple noise: strange attractors in intracranial structures , 1990 .

[13]  Mw Hirsch,et al.  Chaos In Dynamical Systems , 2016 .

[14]  W. Freeman.  The physiology of perception. , 1991, Scientific American.

[15]  A. Babloyantz,et al.  Evidence of Chaotic Dynamics of Brain Activity During the Sleep Cycle , 1985 .

[16]  Martin Gardner,et al.  Fractal music, hypercards and more , 1995, The Mathematical Gazette.

[17]  H. Abarbanel,et al.  Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[18]  T. Melnechuk,et al.  Dynamics of Sensory and Cognitive Processing by the Brain , 1988, Springer Series in Brain Dynamics.

[19]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  PERCEPTION OF MUSIC AND DIMENSIONAL COMPLEXITY OF BRAIN ACTIVITY , 1996 .