Using the 2019 JBE conference and 2017 JIS themed issue as natural experiments to examine the role of editors as gatekeepers of the research literature in AIS and ethics

Abstract In April 2019, the Journal of Business Ethics (JBE) held a conference devoted to the “The Impact of Technology on Ethics, Professionalism and Judgement in Accounting”. This follows the summer 2017 Journal of Information Systems (JIS) themed issue on “Accounting Information Systems and Ethics” I treat this conference and the themed issue as two natural experiments into the evolution of the research literature on Accounting Information Systems (AIS) and ethics. I label this literature as “AIS-ethics”, which I describe as the intersection of the fields of accounting, ethics and information systems. The choice of papers for these two initiatives is amongst the best available metrics of both the latest research on AIS-ethics, and of the kind of research considered desirable by editors/gatekeepers. In particular, I analyze whether these editors/gatekeepers desire papers that fit unambiguously into AIS-ethics, or whether they are willing to accept papers with a more tenuous connection in order to encourage broader participation by researchers. I find that of nine papers selected for special issues or conferences in AIS-ethics over the last three years, only three clearly fall into this domain, suggesting that achieving a critical mass of papers is prioritized over specialization at this stage in the development of a research literature into AIS and ethics.

[1]  Paul F. Williams,et al.  ACCOUNTING FROM THE INSIDE: LEGITIMIZING THE ACCOUNTING ACADEMIC ELITE , 1999 .

[2]  Jesse F. Dillard,et al.  Professional Services, IBM, and the Holocaust , 2003, J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Han Reichgelt,et al.  Emergence of the Information Technology Discipline , 2010, Computer.

[4]  E. Schoen.  The 2007–2009 Financial Crisis: An Erosion of Ethics: A Case Study , 2017 .

[5]  Robert E. Crossler,et al.  Understanding Compliance with Bring Your Own Device Policies Utilizing Protection Motivation Theory: Bridging the Intention-Behavior Gap , 2014, J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  R. Ball,et al.  An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers , 1968 .

[7]  Severin V. Grabski,et al.  A Review of ERP Research: A Future Agenda for Accounting Information Systems , 2011, J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Deborah J. Armstrong,et al.  Exhaustion from Information System Career Experience: Implications for Turn-Away Intention , 2015, MIS Q..

[9]  B. Frey,et al.  Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing between One's Own Ideas and Academic Failure , 2002 .

[10]  Donald R. Deis,et al.  Auditors' Training and Proficiency in Information Systems: A Research Synthesis , 2009, J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Steve G. Sutton.  Editors comments: Rediscovering our IS roots , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[12]  M. Abdolmohammadi,et al.  Does XBRL disclosure management solution influence earnings release efficiency and earnings management? , 2019, International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.

[13]  Donna D. Bobek,et al.  Are Individuals More Willing to Lie to a Computer or a Human? Evidence from a Tax Compliance Setting , 2020 .

[14]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Do Managers Use Extension Elements Strategically in the SEC's Tagged Data for Financial Statements? Evidence from XBRL Complexity , 2018, J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Guy B. Adams,et al.  Unmasking Administrative Evil , 2019 .

[16]  Andreas I. Nicolaou.  Firm Performance Effects in Relation to the Implementation and Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems , 2004, J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[18]  Glen L. Gray,et al.  Incorporating big data in audits: Identifying inhibitors and a research agenda to address those inhibitors , 2016, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  A Field Study on the Use of Process Mining of Event Logs as an Analytical Procedure in Auditing , 2014 .

[20]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Exploiting comparative advantage: A paradigm for value added research in accounting information systems , 2008, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Michael G. Alles.  AIS-Ethics as an Ethical Domain: A Response to Guragai, Hunt, Neri and Taylor (2017) and Dillard and Yuthas (2002) , 2020 .

[22]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Putting Continuous Auditing Theory into Practice: Lessons from Two Pilot Implementations , 2008, J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Alan I. Blankley,et al.  An Examination of Topical Coverage for the First Accounting Information Systems Course , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Glen L. Gray,et al.  "The first mile problem": Deriving an endogenous demand for auditing in blockchain-based business processes , 2020, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Michael G. Alles.  Examining the role of the AIS research literature using the natural experiment of the 2018 JIS conference on cloud computing , 2018, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Robin S. Poston,et al.  Accounting information systems research: Is it another QWERTY? , 2000, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[27]  David Y. Chan,et al.  Consequences of XBRL Standardization on Financial Statement Data , 2012, J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  George Reynolds.  Ethics in Information Technology , 2002 .

[29]  Thomas A. Lee,et al.  The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy , 1997 .

[30]  Steve G. Sutton,et al.  A research discipline with no boundaries: Reflections on 20 years of defining AIS research , 2010, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Michael J. Davern,et al.  Black Box Analytics and Ethical Decision Making , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  M. Curtis,et al.  What Happens When Formal and Informal Norms Conflict for IT Usage? , 2020, J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Whither Accounting Research , 2007 .

[34]  Mariarosaria Taddeo,et al.  The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate , 2016, Big Data Soc..