Nonlinear functional mapping of the human brain

The field of neuroimaging has truly become data rich, and novel analytical methods capable of gleaning meaningful information from large stores of imaging data are in high demand. Those methods that might also be applicable on the level of individual subjects, and thus potentially useful clinically, are of special interest. In the present study, we introduce just such a method, called nonlinear functional mapping (NFM), and demonstrate its application in the analysis of resting state fMRI from a 242-subject subset of the IMAGEN project, a European study of adolescents that includes longitudinal phenotypic, behavioral, genetic, and neuroimaging data. NFM employs a computational technique inspired by biological evolution to discover and mathematically characterize interactions among ROI (regions of interest), without making linear or univariate assumptions. We show that statistics of the resulting interaction relationships comport with recent independent work, constituting a preliminary cross-validation. Furthermore, nonlinear terms are ubiquitous in the models generated by NFM, suggesting that some of the interactions characterized here are not discoverable by standard linear methods of analysis. We discuss one such nonlinear interaction in the context of a direct comparison with a procedure involving pairwise correlation, designed to be an analogous linear version of functional mapping. We find another such interaction that suggests a novel distinction in brain function between drinking and non-drinking adolescents: a tighter coupling of ROI associated with emotion, reward, and interoceptive processes such as thirst, among drinkers. Finally, we outline many improvements and extensions of the methodology to reduce computational expense, complement other analytical tools like graph-theoretic analysis, and allow for voxel level NFM to eliminate the necessity of ROI selection.

[1]  T. Hammeke,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging mapping of the motor cortex in patients with cerebral tumors. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Left prefrontal activation during episodic remembering: an event‐related fMRI study , 1998, Neuroreport.

[3]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:368–372(1998) � Independent Component Analysis of fMRI Data: Examining the Assumptions , 2022 .

[4]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Nonlinear independent component analysis: Existence and uniqueness results , 1999, Neural Networks.

[5]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Brain Imaging , 2003, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[6]  B. Rosen,et al.  Acupuncture modulates the limbic system and subcortical gray structures of the human brain: Evidence from fMRI studies in normal subjects , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[7]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Nonlinear Regression of Functional MRI Data: An Item Recognition Task Study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[10]  I. Fried,et al.  Coupling Between Neuronal Firing, Field Potentials, and fMRI in Human Auditory Cortex , 2005, Science.

[11]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[12]  Cornelis J Stam,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain , 2007, Nonlinear biomedical physics.

[13]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Fast Genetic Programming on GPUs , 2007, EuroGP.

[14]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[15]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.

[16]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  fMRI in the presence of task-correlated breathing variations , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Rietschel,et al.  The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology , 2010, Molecular Psychiatry.

[20]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Jimin Liang,et al.  The hybrid GLM–ICA investigation on the neural mechanism of acupoint ST36: An fMRI study , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  Trent McConaghy,et al.  FFX: Fast, Scalable, Deterministic Symbolic Regression Technology , 2011 .

[23]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Behavioral Interpretations of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Robustly measuring vascular reactivity differences with breath-hold: Normalising stimulus-evoked and resting state BOLD fMRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  Mohammed Yeasin,et al.  An automated framework for hypotheses generation using literature , 2012, BioData Mining.

[26]  M. Rietschel,et al.  Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Daniel E. Rio,et al.  Development of the Complex General Linear Model in the Fourier Domain: Application to fMRI Multiple Input-Output Evoked Responses for Single Subjects , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[28]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  A Deterministic and Symbolic Regression Hybrid Applied to Resting-State fMRI Data , 2013, GPTP.

[29]  M. Rietschel,et al.  Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers , 2014, Nature.

[30]  Peter J. Haas,et al.  Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature , 2014, KDD.