Studies of the quenching phenomenon in delayed contact hypersensitivity reactions

Studies in guinea pig and man have shown that eugenol can quench non‐specifically contact urticarial responses, whereas limonene seems largely ineffective In a comprehensive series of studies, there was little evidence of quenching of delayed contact hypersensitivity reactions to cinnamic aldehyde or citral, including in ‘pre‐quenched’ material supplied by a perfume flavour company, and in a similar mixture prepared in this laboratory, in the guinea pig model. In addition, there was no evidence of the quenching by eugenol of allergic reactions to cinnamic aldehyde in a panel of human subjects with a proven history of cinnamic‐aldehyde‐induced allergic contact dermatitis. Overall, the results lend little credibility to earlier literature reports of quenching phenomena in delayed contact hypersensitivity responses.

[1]  R. Rycroft,et al.  Allergy to perfume ingredients , 1980, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  M. Picardo,et al.  Contact dermatitis to fragrances , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[3]  H. Degreef,et al.  Contact and systemic contact-type dermatitis to spices. , 1990, Dermatologic clinics.

[4]  R. Suskind,et al.  OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ALLERGIC PROBLEMS OF THE SKIN * , 1976, The Journal of dermatology.

[5]  C. Romaguera,et al.  Patch tests with allergens related to cosmetics , 1983, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  N. Veien Systemically induced eczema in adults. , 1989, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[7]  D. W. Sharp The sensitization potential of some perfume ingredients tested using a modified draize procedure. , 1978, Toxicology.

[8]  W. F. Schorr Cinnamic aldehyde allergy , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  Veien Nk Systemically induced eczema in adults. , 1989 .

[10]  R. Suskind,et al.  Mechanism of cinnamaldehyde sensitization * , 1977, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  Johnny Mitchell,et al.  Aroma chemicals Reference sources for perfume and flavour ingredients with special reference to cinnamic aldehyde , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  A. Kligman Full Length ReportThe Identification of Contact Allergens by Human Assay: III. The Maximization Test: A Procedure for Screening and Rating Contact Sensitizers* , 1966 .

[13]  H. Maibach,et al.  Patch testing with some components of balsam of Peru , 1976, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  W. Larsen Sanitary napkin dermatitis due to the perfume. , 1979, Archives of Dermatology.

[15]  J. Guin,et al.  The effect of quenching agents on contact urticaria caused by cinnamic aldehyde. , 1984, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  Single injection adjuvant test. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[17]  J. Hansen,et al.  Penetration of the fragrance compounds, cinnamaldehyde and cinnamyl alcohol, through human skin in vitro , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  J. Nethercott Results of routine patch testing of 200 patients in Toronto, Canada * , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  W. Larsen Perfume dermatitis. a study of 20 patients. , 1977, Archives of dermatology.

[20]  W. G. Larsen Perfume dermatitis. , 1985, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[21]  E. Buehler,et al.  DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965, Archives of dermatology.

[22]  A M Kligman,et al.  Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[23]  G. R. Thompson,et al.  Cinnamic aldehyde: a survey of consumer patch-test sensitization. , 1983, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[24]  N. Hjorth,et al.  Patch test sensitization from d,l-alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E). , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[25]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Sensitivity to cinnamic aldehyde in a toothpaste. 2. Further studies , 1975, Contact Dermatitis.

[26]  W. Larsen Allergic contact dermatitis to ingredients used in topically applied pharmaceutical products and cosmetics , 1984 .

[27]  D. Cane,et al.  Contact dermatitis and flare from food flavouring agents , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[28]  D. Basketter,et al.  Immediate contact reactions to chemicals in the fragrance mix and a study of the quenching action of eugenol , 1990, The British journal of dermatology.

[29]  J. V. D. Hoek,et al.  S multaneous allergy to perfume ingredients , 1985 .

[30]  D. Opdyke Inhibition of sensitization reactions induced by certain aldehydes. , 1976, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[31]  Earl J. Runder North American Group Results , 1977 .

[32]  K. Okamoto,et al.  Studies on contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig The cumulative contact enhancement test , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[33]  C. Benezra,et al.  The influence of limonene on induced delayed hypersensitivity to citral in guinea pigs. I. Histological study. , 1983, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[34]  N. Veien,et al.  Oral challenge with food additives , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[35]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Cinnamic aldehyde in toothpaste. 1. Clinical aspects and patch tests , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[36]  J. Ring,et al.  Patch testing with fragrance mix at 16% and 8%, and its individual constituents , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[37]  P. Bonnevie Some experiences of war-time industrial dermatoses. , 1948, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[38]  A M Kligman,et al.  The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[39]  A. Fisher,et al.  The effect of perfume “ageing” on the allergenicity of individual perfume ingredients , 1976, Contact dermatitis.