Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates

ABSTRACT Most neuroscientific studies have focused on task‐evoked activations (activity amplitudes at specific brain locations), providing limited insight into the functional relationships between separate brain locations. Task‐state functional connectivity (FC) – statistical association between brain activity time series during task performance – moves beyond task‐evoked activations by quantifying functional interactions during tasks. However, many task‐state FC studies do not remove the first‐order effect of task‐evoked activations prior to estimating task‐state FC. It has been argued that this results in the ambiguous inference “likely active or interacting during the task”, rather than the intended inference “likely interacting during the task”. Utilizing a neural mass computational model, we verified that task‐evoked activations substantially and inappropriately inflate task‐state FC estimates, especially in functional MRI (fMRI) data. Various methods attempting to address this problem have been developed, yet the efficacies of these approaches have not been systematically assessed. We found that most standard approaches for fitting and removing mean task‐evoked activations were unable to correct these inflated correlations. In contrast, methods that flexibly fit mean task‐evoked response shapes effectively corrected the inflated correlations without reducing effects of interest. Results with empirical fMRI data confirmed the model's predictions, revealing activation‐induced task‐state FC inflation for both Pearson correlation and psychophysiological interaction (PPI) approaches. These results demonstrate that removal of mean task‐evoked activations using an approach that flexibly models task‐evoked response shape is an important preprocessing step for valid estimation of task‐state FC. HIGHLIGHTSComputational model shows task inflation of functional connectivity estimates.Hemodynamic responses cause task activations to further inflate estimates.Standard approaches to remove task activations leave many false positives.Methods that flexibly fit hemodynamic response shape effectively correct inflation.Correction of functional connectivity inflation verified with empirical fMRI data.

[1]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Disambiguating brain functional connectivity , 2017 .

[3]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[4]  Mark Laubach,et al.  Methods for studying functional interactions among neuronal populations. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[5]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[6]  Keith Bush,et al.  A comparison of statistical methods for detecting context-modulated functional connectivity in fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  John C Gore,et al.  Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[9]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[11]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  S. Bressler,et al.  Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: implications for the analysis of functional connectivity , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Transient BOLD responses at block transitions , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Cohen,et al.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Christopher P. Said,et al.  Top-down attention switches coupling between low-level and high-level areas of human visual cortex , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Cognitive task information is transferred between brain regions via resting-state network topology , 2017, Nature Communications.

[20]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Steps toward optimizing motion artifact removal in functional connectivity MRI; a reply to Carp , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  An Empirical Validation of , 1987 .

[23]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Evaluation of highly accelerated simultaneous multi-slice EPI for fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[24]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Mapping the human brain's cortical-subcortical functional network organization , 2018, NeuroImage.

[26]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[27]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[28]  C. Gaál [About hierarchy]. , 2003, Orvosi Hetilap.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[30]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): A comparison to standard approaches , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Category-selective background connectivity in ventral visual cortex. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Functional connectivity change as shared signal dynamics , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Cortical information flow during flexible sensorimotor decisions , 2015, Science.

[36]  Michael Cole,et al.  Cognitive task information is transferred between brain regions via resting-state network topology , 2017 .

[37]  Sepideh Sadaghiani,et al.  Ongoing dynamics in large-scale functional connectivity predict perception , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[40]  Laleh Najafizadeh,et al.  Capturing dynamic patterns of task-based functional connectivity with EEG , 2013, NeuroImage.

[41]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  The general linear model and fMRI: Does love last forever? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[42]  H. Laufs,et al.  Decoding Wakefulness Levels from Typical fMRI Resting-State Data Reveals Reliable Drifts between Wakefulness and Sleep , 2014, Neuron.

[43]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[44]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  David J. Freedman,et al.  A hierarchy of intrinsic timescales across primate cortex , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Yang Dan,et al.  Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Adult Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[48]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  D. Paré,et al.  Prefrontal Control of the Amygdala , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Data Quality Influences Observed Links Between Functional Connectivity and Behavior , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[52]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Collective dynamics in human and monkey sensorimotor cortex: predicting single neuron spikes , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Drew B Headley,et al.  Fear Conditioning Enhances Gamma Oscillations and Their Entrainment of Neurons Representing the Conditioned Stimulus , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  G L Gerstein,et al.  Mutual temporal relationships among neuronal spike trains. Statistical techniques for display and analysis. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[56]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets , 2006, Neuron.

[57]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic modeling of neuronal responses in fMRI using cubature Kalman filtering , 2011, NeuroImage.

[58]  Jérémie Barral,et al.  Synaptic scaling rule preserves excitatory–inhibitory balance and salient neuronal network dynamics , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  N. Volkow,et al.  Functional connectivity and brain activation: a synergistic approach. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  Romain Brette,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Brian: a Simulator for Spiking Neural Networks in Python , 2022 .

[61]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[62]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[63]  Joseph C. Griffis,et al.  Retinotopic patterns of background connectivity between V1 and fronto-parietal cortex are modulated by task demands , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[64]  F. Rieke,et al.  Noise correlations improve response fidelity and stimulus encoding , 2010, Nature.

[65]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[66]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[67]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  N. Córdova,et al.  Attentional modulation of background connectivity between ventral visual cortex and the medial temporal lobe , 2016, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[69]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain work and brain imaging. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[70]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[71]  W. Schneider,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of practice-related change: fMRI and meta-analytic evidence of a domain-general control network for learning. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[72]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study “resting state” functional connectivity , 2007, NeuroImage.

[73]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[74]  Joseph W. Dubis,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Error-Related Activity in the Human Brain , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  Timothy S. Coalson,et al.  Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[76]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[77]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[78]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Evidence for Two Independent Factors that Modify Brain Networks to Meet Task Goals. , 2016, Cell reports.

[79]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[80]  John E. Warnock,et al.  Dynamic modeling , 1977, SIGGRAPH.

[81]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Neocortical Connectivity during Episodic Memory Formation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[82]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Data-driven significance estimation for precise spike correlation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[83]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[84]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[85]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[86]  S. Petersen,et al.  Concepts and principles in the analysis of brain networks , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[87]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[88]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Dissociable frontal-striatal and frontal-parietal networks involved in updating hierarchical contexts in working memory. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[89]  M. Smith,et al.  The Core System , 2017 .

[90]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[91]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[92]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[93]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.