Autobiographical elaboration reduces memory distortion: cognitive operations and the distinctiveness heuristic.

Retrieval monitoring enhances episodic memory accuracy. For instance, false recognition is reduced when participants base their decisions on more distinctive recollections, a retrieval monitoring process called the distinctiveness heuristic. The experiments reported here tested the hypothesis that autobiographical elaboration during study (i.e., generating autobiographical memories in response to cue words) would lead to more distinctive recollections than other item-specific encoding tasks, enhancing retrieval monitoring accuracy at test. Consistent with this hypothesis, false recognition was less likely when participants had to search their memory for previous autobiographical elaborations, compared to previous semantic judgments. These false recognition effects were dissociated from true recognition effects across four experiments, implicating a recollection-based monitoring process that was independent from familiarity-based processes. Separately obtained subjective measures provided converging evidence for this conclusion. The cognitive operations engaged during autobiographical elaboration can lead to distinctive recollections, making them less prone to memory distortion than other types of deep or semantic encoding.

[1]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[2]  N. Anderson.  Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Herbert F. Crovitz,et al.  Frequency of episodic memories as a function of their age , 1974 .

[4]  G. Davies,et al.  Attribute Coding at Different Levels of Processing , 1976 .

[5]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  V. S. Reed,et al.  Learning to Order Pictures and Words: A Model of Sensory and Semantic Encoding. , 1977 .

[7]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Remembering information related to one's self ☆ , 1979 .

[8]  E. Ghatala.  Imagery and associative processing effects on incidental memory. , 1981 .

[9]  Mary Ann Foley,et al.  Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring , 1981 .

[10]  L. A. McElroy,et al.  Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect , 1982 .

[11]  E. Tulving.  Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[12]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Polly Brown,et al.  The self-reference effect with imagery encoding. , 1986 .

[14]  S. Klein,et al.  The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. , 1988 .

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Two Self-Reference Effects: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Self-Descriptiveness Judgments and Autobiographical Retrieval in Self-Referent Encoding , 1989 .

[16]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences , 1993 .

[18]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[21]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  D. Schacter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  R. Reed Hunt,et al.  Presentation modality affects false memory , 1998 .

[24]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .

[25]  Jason L. Hicks,et al.  Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring. , 1999 .

[26]  D. Schacter,et al.  “If I had said it I would have remembered it: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Word-Frequency Mirror Effect in Young, Old, and Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Two Processes in Episodic Recognition Performance , 2002 .

[28]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[29]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  When False Recognition Meets Metacognition: The Distinctiveness Heuristic , 2002 .

[30]  D. Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Remembering and knowing in context , 2003 .

[31]  J. R. Vokey,et al.  Illusory Recollection and Dual–Process Models of Recognition Memory , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  D. Gallo.  Using recall to reduce false recognition: diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts , 2004 .

[34]  Martin A. Conway,et al.  Memory and the self , 2005 .

[35]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Electrophysiological Dissociation of Picture Versus Word Encoding: The Distinctiveness Heuristic as a Retrieval Orientation , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Gallo.  Associative Illusions of Memory: False Memory Research in DRM and Related Tasks , 2006 .

[37]  Lisa Geraci,et al.  Examining the basis for illusory recollection: The role of remember/know instructions , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  J. Worthen,et al.  Distinctiveness and memory. , 2006 .

[39]  D. P. Mccabe,et al.  The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall , 2006, Memory.

[40]  M. A. Foley,et al.  Imagination and false memory inductions: investigating the role of process, content and source of imaginations , 2006 .

[41]  D. Schacter,et al.  Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic , 2006, Memory.

[42]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Reducing memory errors: The distinctiveness heuristic. , 2006 .

[43]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Neural substrates of envisioning the future , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Glen E. Bodner,et al.  Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[45]  Daniel L Schacter,et al.  Aging can spare recollection-based retrieval monitoring: the importance of event distinctiveness. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[46]  H. Foley,et al.  Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: Evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[47]  S. Becker,et al.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. , 2007, Psychological review.

[48]  Alana T. Wong,et al.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  J. Wixted.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[50]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Deconstructing episodic memory with construction , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  D. Rubin,et al.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of autobiographical memory: neural correlates of recall, emotional intensity, and reliving. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  David A. Gallo,et al.  Deep levels of processing elicit a distinctiveness heuristic: Evidence from the criterial recollection task , 2008 .