Reliability and Validity of a Korean Version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire

Purpose There are no specific tools for measurement of the severity of chronic cough in Korea. We developed a Korean version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and tested its scaling and clinical properties. Methods The LCQ was adapted for Korean conditions following a forward-backward translation procedure. All patients referred to chronic cough clinics at 5 university hospitals between May 2011 and October 2013 completed 2 questionnaires, the LCQ and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), upon presentation and completed the LCQ and the Global Rating of Change (GRC) upon follow-up visits after 2 or 4 weeks. Concurrent validation, internal consistency, repeatability, and responsiveness were determined. Results For the concurrent validation, the correlation coefficients (n=202 patients) between the LCQ and SF-36 varied between 0.42 and 0.58. The internal consistency of the LCQ (n=207) was high for each of the domains with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.82-0.94. The repeatability of the LCQ in patients with no change in cough (n=23) was high, with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.66-0.81. Patients who reported an improvement in cough (n=30) on follow-up visits demonstrated significant improvement in each of the domains of the LCQ. Conclusions The Korean version of the LCQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire for measurement of the severity of cough in patients with chronic cough.

[1]  F. Kauffmann,et al.  The epidemiology of cough. , 2011, Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[2]  S. Leconte,et al.  Validated Methods of Cough Assessment: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2010, Respiration.

[3]  Kevin McGuinness,et al.  A comparison of objective and subjective measures of cough in asthma. , 2008, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[4]  S. Birring,et al.  ERS guidelines on the assessment of cough , 2007, European Respiratory Journal.

[5]  Kevin McGuinness,et al.  Chronic cough: how do cough reflex sensitivity and subjective assessments correlate with objective cough counts during ambulatory monitoring? , 2007, Thorax.

[6]  J. K. van den Berg,et al.  Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire , 2007, Cough.

[7]  I. Pavord,et al.  Cough frequency, cough sensitivity and health status in patients with chronic cough. , 2006, Respiratory medicine.

[8]  T. Molen,et al.  Health status measurement in COPD: the minimal clinically important difference of the clinical COPD questionnaire , 2006, Respiratory research.

[9]  L. Boulet,et al.  An empiric integrative approach to the management of cough: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. , 2006, Chest.

[10]  M. Ekici,et al.  Evaluation and impact of chronic cough: comparison of specific vs generic quality-of-life questionnaires. , 2005, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[11]  Sally J. Singh,et al.  Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) , 2003, Thorax.

[12]  K. Kalantar-Zadeh,et al.  Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[13]  K. Chung,et al.  Coughing frequency in patients with persistent cough: assessment using a 24 hour ambulatory recorder. , 1994, The European respiratory journal.

[14]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.