New analysis methods to push the boundaries of diagnostic techniques in the environmental sciences

In the last years, new and more sophisticated measurements have been at the basis of the major progress in various disciplines related to the environment, such as remote sensing and thermonuclear fusion. To maximize the effectiveness of the measurements, new data analysis techniques are required. First data processing tasks, such as filtering and fitting, are of primary importance, since they can have a strong influence on the rest of the analysis. Even if Support Vector Regression is a method devised and refined at the end of the 90s, a systematic comparison with more traditional non parametric regression methods has never been reported. In this paper, a series of systematic tests is described, which indicates how SVR is a very competitive method of non-parametric regression that can usefully complement and often outperform more consolidated approaches. The performance of Support Vector Regression as a method of filtering is investigated first, comparing it with the most popular alternative techniques. Then Support Vector Regression is applied to the problem of non-parametric regression to analyse Lidar surveys for the environments measurement of particulate matter due to wildfires. The proposed approach has given very positive results and provides new perspectives to the interpretation of the data.

[1]  A Murari,et al.  UMEL: a new regression tool to identify measurement peaks in LIDAR/DIAL systems for environmental physics applications. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[2]  M. Richetta,et al.  Evolution study of smoke backscattering coefficients in a cell by means of a compact mobile Nd:YAG lidar system , 2007, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[3]  Michela Gelfusa,et al.  Early detection of small forest fire by dial technique , 2005, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[4]  J. Vega,et al.  First attempts at measuring widespread smoke with a mobile LIDAR system , 2015 .

[5]  J. Vega,et al.  Advanced signal processing based on support vector regression for lidar applications , 2015, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[6]  Jesús Vega,et al.  Automatic localization of backscattering events due to particulate in urban areas , 2014, Remote Sensing.

[7]  Michela Gelfusa,et al.  Extensive statistical analysis of ELMs on JET with a carbon wall , 2014 .

[8]  Andrei B. Utkin,et al.  Detection of small forest fires by lidar , 2002 .

[9]  F. Andreucci,et al.  A study of forest fire automatic detection systems , 1993 .

[10]  F. Andreucci,et al.  A study on forest fire automatic detection systems , 1993 .

[11]  A. Murari,et al.  New frontiers of Forest Fire Protection : A portable Laser System (FfED). , 2013 .

[12]  A Murari,et al.  A universal support vector machines based method for automatic event location in waveforms and video-movies: applications to massive nuclear fusion databases. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[13]  M. Francucci,et al.  Application of a CO2 dial system for infrared detection of forest fire and reduction of false alarm , 2007 .

[14]  Michela Gelfusa,et al.  Reduction of false alarms in forest fire surveillance using water vapour concentration measurements , 2009 .