Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2014

Patient-specific modeling of blood flow combining CT image data and computational fluid dynamics has significant potential for assessing the functional significance of coronary artery disease. An accurate segmentation of the coronary arteries, an essential ingredient for blood flow modeling methods, is currently attained by a combination of automated algorithms with human review and editing. However, not all portions of the coronary artery tree affect blood flow and pressure equally, and it is of significant importance to direct human review and editing towards regions that will most affect the subsequent simulations. We present a data-driven approach for real-time estimation of sensitivity of blood-flow simulations to uncertainty in lumen segmentation. A machine learning method is used to map patient-specific features to a sensitivity value, using a large database of patients with precomputed sensitivities. We validate the results of the machine learning algorithm using direct 3D blood flow simulations and demonstrate that the algorithm can predict sensitivities in real time with only a small reduction in accuracy as compared to the 3D solutions. This approach can also be applied to other medical applications where physiologic simulations are performed using patient-specific models created from image data.

[1]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[2]  Mary A. Rutherford,et al.  Reconstruction of fetal brain MRI with intensity matching and complete outlier removal , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Localisation of the Brain in Fetal MRI Using Bundled SIFT Features , 2013, MICCAI.

[4]  Swati Deshmukh,et al.  MR assessment of normal fetal lung volumes: a literature review. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  W M Thurlbeck,et al.  Human lung growth in late gestation and in the neonate. , 1984, The American review of respiratory disease.

[6]  G. Langs,et al.  Fully Automated Brain Extraction and Orientation in Raw Fetal MRI , 2013 .

[7]  Borut Marincek,et al.  MR assessment of fetal lung development using lung volumes and signal intensities , 2004, European Radiology.

[8]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[9]  Colin Studholme,et al.  BTK: An open-source toolkit for fetal brain MR image processing , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[10]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Automatic segmentation of head structures on fetal MRI , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[11]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  MRI of Moving Subjects Using Multislice Snapshot Images With Volume Reconstruction (SVR): Application to Fetal, Neonatal, and Adult Brain Studies , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Mandy Eberhart,et al.  Decision Forests For Computer Vision And Medical Image Analysis , 2016 .

[13]  Andrew Blake,et al.  GeoS: Geodesic Image Segmentation , 2008, ECCV.

[14]  Yang Yu,et al.  Automatic image annotation using group sparsity , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Gregor Kasprian,et al.  MRI of normal and pathological fetal lung development. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[16]  D. Levine,et al.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[17]  M. Duyme,et al.  Fetal lung volumetry using two‐ and three‐dimensional ultrasound , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.