First and Others credit-assignment schema for evaluating the academic contribution of coauthors

Credit-assignment schemas are widely applied by providing fixed or flexible credit distribution formulas to evaluate the contributions of coauthors of a scientific publication. In this paper, we propose an approach named First and Others (F&O) counting. By introducing a tuning parameter α and a weight β, two new properties are obtained: (1) flexible assignment of credits by modifying the formula (with the change of α) and applying preference to the individual author by adjusting the weights (with the change of β), and (2) calculation of the credits by separating the formula for the first author from others. With formula separation, the credit of the second author shows an inflection point according to the change of α. The developed theorems and proofs concerning the modification of α and β reveal new properties and complement the base theory for informetrics. The F&O schema is also adapted when considering the policy of ‘first-corresponding-author-emphasis’. Through a comparative analysis using a set of empirical data from the fields of chemistry, medicine, psychology, and the Harvard survey data, the performance of the F&O approach is compared with those of other methods to demonstrate its benefits by the criteria of lack of fit and coefficient of determination.

[1]  R P Boas.  Mathematical Authorship. , 1964, Science.

[2]  S Melman.  Overkill and the Defense Budget. , 1964, Science.

[3]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[4]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .

[5]  M Dym,et al.  Gossypol: effect on testosterone. , 1981, Science.

[6]  H Boxenbaum,et al.  Publication rates of pharmaceutical scientists: application of the waring distribution. , 1987, Drug metabolism reviews.

[7]  L B Ellwein,et al.  Assessing research productivity: evaluating journal publication across academic departments , 1989, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[9]  I. Lukovits,et al.  Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors , 1995 .

[10]  V. L. Kalyane,et al.  Quantification of credit for authorship , 1995 .

[11]  T. Keats,et al.  On multiple authorship. , 1996, Skeletal radiology.

[12]  James W. Endersby.  Collaborative research in the social sciences : Multiple authorship and publication credit , 1996 .

[13]  Guido Van Hooydonk.  Fractional Counting of Multiauthored Publications: Consequences for the Impact of Authors , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  P. Vinkler.  Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators , 2000 .

[15]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Héctor Guerrero,et al.  A robust formula to credit authors for their publications , 2004, Scientometrics.

[17]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness , 2005, Scientometrics.

[18]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[19]  M. Bazerman,et al.  The costs and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Lost in citation: Vanishing visibility of senior authors , 2007, Scientometrics.

[21]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  The write position , 2007, EMBO reports.

[22]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications , 2007, PLoS biology.

[23]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research , 2007, Scientometrics.

[24]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  The state of the art in publication counting , 2008, Scientometrics.

[25]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank , 2009, EMBO reports.

[26]  Xiaojun Hu,et al.  Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of “equal first authors” and corresponding authors , 2009 .

[27]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically , 2009, Scientometrics.

[28]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Research Note - The Researcher as a Consumer of Scientific Publications: How Do Name-Ordering Conventions Affect Inferences About Contribution Credits? , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Xiaojun Hu,et al.  Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of "equal first authors" and corresponding authors , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  N. Assimakis,et al.  A new author’s productivity index: p-index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[31]  Ash Mohammad Abbas.  Generalized Linear Weights for Sharing Credits Among Multiple Authors , 2010, ArXiv.

[32]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Ash Mohammad Abbas,et al.  Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship , 2010, Scientometrics.

[34]  Hui Fang,et al.  Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index , 2011, Scientometrics.

[35]  Bing He,et al.  Mining patterns of author orders in scientific publications , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[36]  Jian Du,et al.  Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices , 2012, Scientometrics.

[37]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[38]  Tindaro Cicero,et al.  How important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations? , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[39]  Liaojun Pang,et al.  Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[41]  Tang Xiaoli,et al.  Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices , 2013, Scientometrics.

[42]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[43]  Jana Diesner,et al.  A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocation , 2014, Scientometrics.

[44]  Jinseok Kim,et al.  Rethinking the comparison of coauthorship credit allocation schemes , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[45]  Mike May,et al.  Nature Index 2015 Global , 2015, Nature.

[46]  Weigang Li,et al.  Influential Analysis in Micro Scholar Social Networks , 2015, SocInf@IJCAI.

[47]  Nan Li,et al.  Using heterogeneous patent network features to rank and discover influential inventors , 2015, Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering.

[48]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Will This Paper Increase Your h-index?: Scientific Impact Prediction , 2014, WSDM.

[49]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[50]  Min Song,et al.  Author credit‐assignment schemas: A comparison and analysis , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..