Mapping urban areas using coarse resolution remotely sensed data

Identifying and anticipating the location, size and growth rate of urbanized areas is an important component to understanding, adapting to, and mitigating many aspects of global change. The main objective of this research is to improve understanding of the methodological, scale and validation requirements for mapping urban land cover from coarse resolution remotely sensed MODIS one kilometer data. Defining the extent of urban land is crucial, since knowledge of the size and spatial distribution of cities is important for regional and global environmental modeling as well as resource management and economic development planning. This research relies on the use of a supervised decision tree classifier, a nonparametric algorithm that has been shown to be effective for classifying noisy and incomplete data sets: a technique called boosting improves classification accuracy and provides a means to correct major sources of error using available prior information from the DMSP-OLS radiance calibrated nighttime lights data set. Results for North America indicate that the incorporation of DMSP-OLS data successfully improves urban classification results. Traditional as well as new measures of accuracy assessment demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology for creating accurate maps of cities over large areas.

[1]  Feng Gao,et al.  Characterization of North American land cover from NOAA‐AVHRR data using the EOS MODIS Land Cover Classification Algorithm , 2000 .

[2]  J. Ibrahim,et al.  Prior elicitation, variable selection and Bayesian computation for logistic regression models , 1999 .

[3]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Estimating pixel-scale land cover classification confidence using nonparametric machine learning methods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Aiko M. Hormann,et al.  Programs for Machine Learning. Part I , 1962, Inf. Control..

[5]  Mark A. Friedl,et al.  Using prior probabilities in decision-tree classification of remotely sensed data , 2002 .

[6]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classi(cid:142) cation at 1 km spatial resolution using a classi(cid:142) cation tree approach , 2004 .

[7]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Monitoring land-use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM , 2002 .

[8]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[9]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  David M. Stoms,et al.  Validating large‐area land cover databases with Maplets , 1996 .

[11]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Bagging, Boosting, and C4.5 , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1.

[12]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Mapping City Lights With Nighttime Data from the DMSP Operational Linescan System , 1997 .

[13]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  D. Danko The digital chart of the world project , 1992 .

[15]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 1991 .

[16]  P. Sutton,et al.  Radiance Calibration of DMSP-OLS Low-Light Imaging Data of Human Settlements , 1999 .

[17]  D. Toll,et al.  Detecting residential land use development at the urban fringe , 1982 .

[18]  R. Leemans Changes in Land use and land cover: A global perspective , 1995 .

[19]  Limin Yang,et al.  An analysis of the IGBP global land-cover characterization process , 1999 .

[20]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Using nighttime DMSP/OLS images of city lights to estimate the impact of urban land use on soil resources in the United States , 1997 .

[21]  J. Townshend,et al.  Continuous fields of vegetation characteristics at the global scale at 1‐km resolution , 1999 .