The superior temporal sulcus and the N170 during face processing: Single trial analysis of concurrent EEG–fMRI

Face-selective neural signals have been reliably identified using both EEG and fMRI studies. These consist of the N170 component, a neural response peaking approximately 170ms after a face is presented, and face-selective activations in the fusiform face area (FFA), the occipital face area (OFA), and the superior temporal sulcus (STS). As most neuroimaging studies examine these face-selective processes separately, the relationship between the N170 neural response and activation in the fusiform gyrus is still debated. In this study, we concurrently measured EEG and fMRI responses to upright faces, inverted faces, and objects to examine this association. We introduce a method for single-trial estimation of N170 amplitudes and correlation of the trial-by-trial variation in N170 neural responses with fMRI BOLD responses. For upright faces, BOLD responses in the right STS were negatively correlated with N170 amplitudes, showing greater activation on trials in which N170 amplitudes were larger (more negative). For inverted faces, a medial region of the fusiform gyrus (mFG) was positively correlated with N170 amplitudes, showing greater activation on trials in which N170 amplitudes were smaller (less negative). This result points to the STS as a crucial region for generating the N170 associated with face perception, and suggests that the mFG is additionally recruited for processing inverted faces, particularly on trials in which N170 is small. Despite the different time resolution of fMRI and EEG signals, our single-trial estimation and EEG-fMRI correlation method can reveal associations between activation in face-selective brain regions and neural processes at 170ms associated with face perception.

[1]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneously with 3-T fMRI: Removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.

[5]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[6]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.

[7]  R. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[9]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  G. Baselli,et al.  Single sweep analysis of visual evoked potentials through a model of parametric identification , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  G. Yovel,et al.  Event‐related potential and functional MRI measures of face‐selectivity are highly correlated: A simultaneous ERP‐fMRI investigation , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  René J. Huster,et al.  Methods for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  I. Tarkka,et al.  Familiar-face recognition and comparison: source analysis of scalp-recorded event-related potentials , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Ann-Christine Ehlis,et al.  Source Localization of Early Stages of Face Processing , 2005, Brain Topography.

[22]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[24]  S. Debener,et al.  Mining EEG-fMRI using independent component analysis. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[26]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Rami K. Niazy,et al.  Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets , 2005, NeuroImage.

[28]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  Connectivity Analysis Reveals a Cortical Network for Eye Gaze Perception , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  M. Eimer Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[33]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[34]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Realignment parameter-informed artefact correction for simultaneous EEG–fMRI recordings , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Effective Connectivity during Processing of Facial Affect: Evidence for Multiple Parallel Pathways , 2022 .

[36]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Christian Seifert,et al.  Single-trial coupling of EEG and fMRI reveals the involvement of early anterior cingulate cortex activation in effortful decision making , 2008, NeuroImage.

[38]  Sakiko Yoshikawa,et al.  Time course of superior temporal sulcus activity in response to eye gaze: a combined fMRI and MEG study. , 2008, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[39]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  Bidirectional communication between amygdala and fusiform gyrus during facial recognition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Hisao Nishijo,et al.  Generators of Visual Evoked Potentials for Faces and Eyes in the Human Brain as Determined by Dipole Localization , 2004, Brain Topography.

[43]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects , 2004, Neuroreport.

[44]  A. Engel,et al.  Single-trial EEG–fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  Nicholas B. Turk-Browne,et al.  Face-Specific Resting Functional Connectivity between the Fusiform Gyrus and Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[46]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[47]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Jie Tian,et al.  Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: A Dynamic Causal Modeling study , 2010, Brain Research.

[49]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[50]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[51]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[52]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Qingyang Li,et al.  Emotional perception: Meta-analyses of face and natural scene processing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[54]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[55]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.