Staggered Onsets of Processing Relevant and Irrelevant Stimulus Features Produce Different Dynamics of Congruency Effects

The dynamics of congruency effects in conflict tasks can be analyzed by means of delta plots which depict the reaction-time differences between incongruent and congruent conditions across the quantiles of the reaction-time distributions. Delta plots exhibit a variety of different shapes. Here we test the hypothesis that staggered onsets of processing task-relevant and task-irrelevant features for response selection (together with a declining influence of the irrelevant feature) produce such variety. For this purpose, staggered onsets were implemented in two extensions of the Leaky, Competing Accumulator model. We show the cardinal capability of these models to produce different shapes of delta plots with different assumptions about temporal offsets between processing relevant and irrelevant stimulus features. Applying the models to experimental data, we first show that they can reproduce the delta plots observed with a conflict task with stimulus size as the irrelevant feature. For this task congruency effects are delayed and appear only at longer reaction times. Second, we fit the models to the results of two new Simon-task experiments with an experimentally controlled temporal offset in addition to the internal one. The experimentally induced variations of the shape of delta plots for this task could be reasonably well fitted by one of the two models that assumed an early start of response selection as soon as either the relevant or the irrelevant stimulus feature becomes available. We conclude that delta plots are crucially shaped by staggered onsets of processing relevant and irrelevant features for response selection.

[1]  H. Leuthold,et al.  The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks. , 2022, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  T. Heed,et al.  Allocation of Visuospatial Attention Indexes Evidence Accumulation for Reach Decisions , 2022, eNeuro.

[3]  Gabriel M Stine,et al.  Direct observation of the neural computations underlying a single decision , 2023, bioRxiv.

[4]  P. Wühr,et al.  The Nature of Associations between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-Right Response Codes , 2022, Journal of cognition.

[5]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Sequential sampling from memory underlies action selection during abstract decision-making , 2021, Current Biology.

[6]  H. Leuthold,et al.  The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks , 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[7]  H. Heuer,et al.  Mapping effects in choice-response and go/no-go variants of the lexical decision task: A case for polarity correspondence , 2021, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  G. Logan,et al.  An integrated theory of deciding and acting. , 2021, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model , 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[10]  Michael S. Pratte Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus , 2020, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[11]  Marios G Philiastides,et al.  The Leaky Integrating Threshold and its impact on evidence accumulation models of choice response time (RT). , 2020, Psychological review.

[12]  H. Heuer,et al.  To respond or not to respond? A model-based comparison between the processing of go, nogo, and neutral stimuli. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Ronald Hübner,et al.  Improving parameter recovery for conflict drift-diffusion models , 2020, Behavior research methods.

[14]  M. Gade,et al.  Simon says-on the influence of stimulus arrangement, stimulus material and inner speech habits on the Simon effect. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Evidence Accumulation Models: Current Limitations and Future Directions , 2019, The Quantitative Methods for Psychology.

[16]  R. Hübner,et al.  Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task , 2019, PloS one.

[17]  H. Heuer,et al.  The impact of anatomical and spatial distance between responses on response conflict , 2018, Memory & Cognition.

[18]  P. Wühr,et al.  Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[19]  G. Logan,et al.  Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  J. Crawford,et al.  Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory , 2017, Memory & cognition.

[21]  H. Heuer,et al.  Response Preparation, Response Conflict, and the Effects of Irrelevant Flanker Stimuli , 2017, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[22]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act , 2017, eLife.

[23]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Parameter recovery for the Leaky Competing Accumulator model , 2017 .

[24]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Cesare V Parise,et al.  Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines. , 2016, Multisensory research.

[27]  F. Tuerlinckx,et al.  Factoring out nondecision time in choice reaction time data: Theory and implications. , 2016, Psychological review.

[28]  Borís Burle,et al.  Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Nathan F. Lepora,et al.  Embodied Choice: How Action Influences Perceptual Decision Making , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Ronald Hübner,et al.  Suppression of irrelevant activation in the horizontal and vertical Simon task differs quantitatively not qualitatively. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[32]  B. Burle,et al.  Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  R. Hübner,et al.  Evidence for strategic suppression of irrelevant activation in the Simon task. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[34]  A. Voss,et al.  Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[35]  A. Voss,et al.  Diffusion Models in Experimental Psychology , 2013 .

[36]  L. Selen,et al.  Deliberation in the Motor System: Reflex Gains Track Evolving Evidence Leading to a Decision , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Michael E. R. Nicholls,et al.  Size Matters: Non-Numerical Magnitude Affects the Spatial Coding of Response , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  P. Wühr,et al.  The role of working memory in spatial S-R correspondence effects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  James D. Miles,et al.  Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: A short review. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[42]  C. Spence Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[43]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Version unknown SOURCE ( OR PART OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCE ) : Type article Title To head or to heed ? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition : a review , 2022 .

[44]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[45]  M. Steinhauser,et al.  A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. , 2010, Psychological review.

[46]  H. Deubel,et al.  Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping , 2010, Vision Research.

[47]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Delta Plots and Coherent Distribution Ordering , 2008 .

[48]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[49]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. , 2007, Psychological review.

[50]  Edmund Wascher,et al.  Response coding in the Simon task , 2007, Psychological research.

[51]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[52]  Borís Burle,et al.  Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks , 2005 .

[53]  Wim Fias,et al.  Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects , 2005 .

[54]  Edmund Wascher,et al.  Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? , 2005, Cognition.

[56]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[57]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Daniela Mapelli,et al.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? , 2003, Cognition.

[59]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  Borís Burle,et al.  Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis , 2002, Psychological research.

[61]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. , 2002 .

[62]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[63]  J. Requin,et al.  The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .

[64]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Distributional Analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber's (1994) Dual-Process Model of the Simon Effect , 1997 .

[65]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Models for response-response compatibility: The effects of the relation between responses in a choice task , 1995 .

[66]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  M. Zorzi,et al.  A computational model of the Simon effect , 1995, Psychological research.

[68]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  B. Hommel Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[70]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[71]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[72]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[73]  H Heuer,et al.  Visual discrimination and response programming , 1987, Psychological research.

[74]  Cornelis H. M. Brunia,et al.  Waiting to Respond: Electrophysiological Measurements in Man During Preparation for a Voluntary Movement , 1985 .

[75]  R A Heath,et al.  Random-Walk and Accumulator Models of Psychophysical Discrimination: A Critical Evaluation , 1984, Perception.

[76]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[78]  J. Richard Simon,et al.  The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing , 1976 .

[79]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[80]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.