Staggered Onsets of Processing Relevant and Irrelevant Stimulus Features Produce Different Dynamics of Congruency Effects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Leuthold,et al. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks. , 2022, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] T. Heed,et al. Allocation of Visuospatial Attention Indexes Evidence Accumulation for Reach Decisions , 2022, eNeuro.
[3] Gabriel M Stine,et al. Direct observation of the neural computations underlying a single decision , 2023, bioRxiv.
[4] P. Wühr,et al. The Nature of Associations between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-Right Response Codes , 2022, Journal of cognition.
[5] M. Shadlen,et al. Sequential sampling from memory underlies action selection during abstract decision-making , 2021, Current Biology.
[6] H. Leuthold,et al. The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks , 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[7] H. Heuer,et al. Mapping effects in choice-response and go/no-go variants of the lexical decision task: A case for polarity correspondence , 2021, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[8] G. Logan,et al. An integrated theory of deciding and acting. , 2021, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[9] W. Schwarz,et al. Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model , 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[10] Michael S. Pratte. Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus , 2020, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[11] Marios G Philiastides,et al. The Leaky Integrating Threshold and its impact on evidence accumulation models of choice response time (RT). , 2020, Psychological review.
[12] H. Heuer,et al. To respond or not to respond? A model-based comparison between the processing of go, nogo, and neutral stimuli. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] Ronald Hübner,et al. Improving parameter recovery for conflict drift-diffusion models , 2020, Behavior research methods.
[14] M. Gade,et al. Simon says-on the influence of stimulus arrangement, stimulus material and inner speech habits on the Simon effect. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[15] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Evidence Accumulation Models: Current Limitations and Future Directions , 2019, The Quantitative Methods for Psychology.
[16] R. Hübner,et al. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task , 2019, PloS one.
[17] H. Heuer,et al. The impact of anatomical and spatial distance between responses on response conflict , 2018, Memory & Cognition.
[18] P. Wühr,et al. Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right , 2018, Journal of cognition.
[19] G. Logan,et al. Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[20] J. Crawford,et al. Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory , 2017, Memory & cognition.
[21] H. Heuer,et al. Response Preparation, Response Conflict, and the Effects of Irrelevant Flanker Stimuli , 2017, Advances in cognitive psychology.
[22] Jörn Diedrichsen,et al. Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act , 2017, eLife.
[23] Birte U. Forstmann,et al. Parameter recovery for the Leaky Competing Accumulator model , 2017 .
[24] Scott D. Brown,et al. Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[25] R. Ratcliff,et al. Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.
[26] Cesare V Parise,et al. Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines. , 2016, Multisensory research.
[27] F. Tuerlinckx,et al. Factoring out nondecision time in choice reaction time data: Theory and implications. , 2016, Psychological review.
[28] Borís Burle,et al. Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[29] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.
[30] Nathan F. Lepora,et al. Embodied Choice: How Action Influences Perceptual Decision Making , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[31] Ronald Hübner,et al. Suppression of irrelevant activation in the horizontal and vertical Simon task differs quantitatively not qualitatively. , 2014, Acta psychologica.
[32] B. Burle,et al. Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[33] R. Hübner,et al. Evidence for strategic suppression of irrelevant activation in the Simon task. , 2013, Acta psychologica.
[34] A. Voss,et al. Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction. , 2013, Experimental psychology.
[35] A. Voss,et al. Diffusion Models in Experimental Psychology , 2013 .
[36] L. Selen,et al. Deliberation in the Motor System: Reflex Gains Track Evolving Evidence Leading to a Decision , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[37] R. Ratcliff,et al. Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.
[38] Michael E. R. Nicholls,et al. Size Matters: Non-Numerical Magnitude Affects the Spatial Coding of Response , 2011, PloS one.
[39] P. Wühr,et al. The role of working memory in spatial S-R correspondence effects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] James D. Miles,et al. Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[41] Hartmut Leuthold,et al. The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: A short review. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[42] C. Spence. Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[43] K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al. Version unknown SOURCE ( OR PART OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCE ) : Type article Title To head or to heed ? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition : a review , 2022 .
[44] Jeffrey N Rouder,et al. Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[45] M. Steinhauser,et al. A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. , 2010, Psychological review.
[46] H. Deubel,et al. Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping , 2010, Vision Research.
[47] Richard D. Morey,et al. Delta Plots and Coherent Distribution Ordering , 2008 .
[48] Roger Ratcliff,et al. The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.
[49] Scott D. Brown,et al. On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. , 2007, Psychological review.
[50] Edmund Wascher,et al. Response coding in the Simon task , 2007, Psychological research.
[51] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.
[52] Borís Burle,et al. Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks , 2005 .
[53] Wim Fias,et al. Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects , 2005 .
[54] Edmund Wascher,et al. Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[55] Antonino Vallesi,et al. Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? , 2005, Cognition.
[56] Philip L. Smith,et al. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.
[57] Vincent Walsh. A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[58] Daniela Mapelli,et al. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? , 2003, Cognition.
[59] R. Ratcliff,et al. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[60] Borís Burle,et al. Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis , 2002, Psychological research.
[61] K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al. Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. , 2002 .
[62] James L. McClelland,et al. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.
[63] J. Requin,et al. The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .
[64] Sylvan Kornblum,et al. Distributional Analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber's (1994) Dual-Process Model of the Simon Effect , 1997 .
[65] Herbert Heuer,et al. Models for response-response compatibility: The effects of the relation between responses in a choice task , 1995 .
[66] R. Proctor,et al. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[67] M. Zorzi,et al. A computational model of the Simon effect , 1995, Psychological research.
[68] E. Lauber,et al. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[69] B. Hommel. Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.
[70] S. Dehaene,et al. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .
[71] J. Stroop. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .
[72] A. Osman,et al. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.
[73] H Heuer,et al. Visual discrimination and response programming , 1987, Psychological research.
[74] Cornelis H. M. Brunia,et al. Waiting to Respond: Electrophysiological Measurements in Man During Preparation for a Voluntary Movement , 1985 .
[75] R A Heath,et al. Random-Walk and Accumulator Models of Psychophysical Discrimination: A Critical Evaluation , 1984, Perception.
[76] R. Ratcliff. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[77] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .
[78] J. Richard Simon,et al. The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing , 1976 .
[79] C. Eriksen,et al. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .
[80] J. R. Simon,et al. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.