The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out

Twenty-six years ago, Richard M. Titmuss (1970) claimed that monetary compensation tends to undermine an individual’s sense of civic duty. He illustrated his claim with blood donations, contending that paying donors negatively affects their willingness to donate blood. This thesis attracted considerable attention. Among others, Robert S. Solow (1971) and Kenneth J. Arrow (1972) discussed the proposition, both assuming that the effects of price incentives can simply be addedto those of altruistic donation. Contrary to Titmuss, economists therefore generally predicted that if the price of bloodis raised, the total quantity offered would increase in accordance with a normal supply function of blood. This discussion subsided rather quickly because there was neither an analytical framework nor convincing empirical evidence to support Titmuss’s case. Today, new theoretical developments suggest that economists should considerpossible detrimental effects of using price incentives. In this paper, we present such a theory whichis derived from social psychology and focuses on the crowding-out of intrinsic motivation.It stipulates that intrin-

[1]  Richard M. Titmuss,et al.  The gift relationship , 1970 .

[2]  M. O'hare "Not On My Block You Don't" - Facilities Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation , 1977 .

[3]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Hidden costs of reward : new perspectives on the psychology of human motivation , 1978 .

[4]  K. Arrow Gifts and Exchanges , 1982 .

[5]  T. Dalyell Blood and thunder , 1983, Nature.

[6]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[7]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Property Rights, Protest, and the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1986 .

[8]  K. Miller,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[9]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Are Risk-Benefit Tradeoffs Possible in Siting Hazardous Facilities? , 1990 .

[10]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Wheel of Misfortune: A Lottery/Auction Mechanism for Siting of Noxious Facilities , 1991 .

[11]  Robert E. Lane,et al.  The market experience , 1996 .

[12]  D. Easterling,et al.  Fair rules for siting a high-level nuclear waste repository , 1992 .

[13]  Arthur O’Sullivan Voluntary Auctions for Noxious Facilities: Incentives to Participate and the Efficiency of Siting Decisions , 1993 .

[14]  Report of the NOOA Panel on Contingent Valuation , 1993 .

[15]  J. Hamilton Politics and Social Costs: Estimating the Impact of Collective Action on Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1993 .

[16]  D. Green,et al.  NIMBY or NIABY: a logit model of opposition to solid-waste-disposal facility siting , 1994 .

[17]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .

[18]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  How Intrinsic Motivation is Crowded out and in , 1994 .

[19]  Breaking the Vicious Cycle , 1994 .

[20]  Paul R. Portney,et al.  The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care , 1994 .

[21]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[22]  Felix Oberholzer-Gee,et al.  Panik, Protest und Paralyse Eine empirische Untersuchung über nukleare Endlager in der Schweiz , 1995 .

[23]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  The Dilemma of Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository , 1995 .

[24]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  Values and Public Policy , 1995 .

[25]  Gary Bryner,et al.  Beyond Nimby: Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States , 1995 .