From land- to water-use-planning: a consequence based case-study related to cruise ship risk

Abstract Even if safety in the shipping industry improved significantly over the last decades, by novel design and construction techniques, driven by technological, cultural and regulation improvements, recent passenger ship accidents emphasized that significant safety challenges still remain. The modern trend towards large cruise ships can pose a serious threat in terms of both people evacuation/rescue and potential impact on sensible environmental targets. This paper firstly presents a critical analysis of three passenger ship accidents, identifying main similarities with the process sector and relevant learning points. Secondly, the study approaches risk evaluation, acceptance criteria and sea use planning in connection with cruise activity, referring to the worldwide known sensible area of Portofino (Italy). By utilizing numerical methods, the study develops a consequence-based framework incorporating the effects, the hazardous distance and the reaction time scale, related to fuel spill and fire scenarios with smoke spreading. The results evidence that the approach can be a powerful tool to design optimal ship route and temporary docking points for cruise tourism, balancing economic issues and mitigating physical impact to sensitive biological communities. Additionally, it can provide a technical basis for setting-up emergency planning, with appropriate response equipment and thus minimizing coastal impact from a spill.

[1]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Atmospheric Emissions from a Fossil Fuel Power Station: Dispersion Modelling and Experimental Comparison , 2014 .

[2]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  A review of the past, present and future of the European loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries , 2014 .

[3]  Jin Wang,et al.  Formal safety assessment of cruise ships , 2004 .

[4]  Richard C. Prielipp,et al.  The Normalization of Deviance: Do We (Un)Knowingly Accept Doing the Wrong Thing? , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Historical analysis of accidents in seaports , 2004 .

[6]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Analytical modelling of hydrocarbon pool fires: Conservative evaluation of flame temperature and thermal power , 2012 .

[7]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Past, present and future of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from Land-Use Planning (LUP) , 2014 .

[8]  P. Brandolini,et al.  Geomorphological hazards and monitoring activity along the western rocky coast of the Portofino Promontory (Italy) , 2007 .

[9]  Giacomo Antonioni,et al.  HazMat transport through Messina town: from risk analysis suggestions for improving territorial safety , 2002 .

[10]  Norberto Piccinini,et al.  Risk analysis as a basis for safety management system , 2004 .

[11]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Oil Spills: From Statistical Analysis To Quantitative Risk Assessment , 2002 .

[12]  Di Jin,et al.  Determinants of the severity of passenger vessel accidents , 2006 .

[13]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Experimental study on thermal and toxic hazards connected to fire scenarios in road tunnels , 2012 .

[14]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Simplified Modelling for Risk Assessment of Hydrocarbon Spills in Port Area , 2004 .

[15]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Risk assessment in maritime transportation , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  D. Carruthers,et al.  Comparisons between FLUENT and ADMS for atmospheric dispersion modelling , 2004 .

[17]  Nicolas Dechy,et al.  Results and lessons learned from the ESReDA’s Accident Investigation Working Group: Introducing article to “Safety Science” special issue on “Industrial Events Investigation” , 2012 .

[18]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  An Approach to Risk Evaluation in Connection with Fire Scenarios from a Cruise Ship , 2015 .

[19]  J. A. Galt,et al.  Development of Quantitative Methods For Spill Response Planning: A Trajectory Analysis Planner , 1999 .

[20]  Michalis Christou,et al.  Risk Assessment In Support To Land-Use Planning In Europe: Towards More Consistent Decisions? , 2011 .

[21]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Coal dust emissions: From environmental control to risk minimization by underground transport. An applicative case-study , 2014 .

[22]  Rolf Skjong,et al.  Designing for Safety in Passenger Ships Utilizing Advanced Evacuation Analyses: A Risk Based Approach , 2006 .

[23]  Maria Francesca Milazzo,et al.  The Influence of Risk Prevention Measures on the Frequency of Failure of Piping , 2010 .

[24]  Bruno Fabiano,et al.  Port safety and the container revolution: A statistical study on human factor and occupational accidents over the long period , 2010 .