The need for effective marking and tracking techniques for monitoring the movements of insect predators and parasitoids

Predators and parasitoids move through the landscape at a wide range of rates and over a broad range of spatial scales. Understanding the dispersal characteristics of such 'beneficials' is of crucial importance for classical, augmentative, inundative and conservation biological control. It is a key practice, following the release of 'classical' (exotic) and augmentative (indigenous) biological control agents, to assess whether they have become successfully established, and also to what extent the agent has spread from the release points. It is important in conservation biological control to understand the role that natural enemy movements play in the improvement of pest control achieved through the provision of pollen, nectar, shelter and/or alternative prey/hosts. Other aspects of predator and parasitoid movement pertinent to biological control are the role refugia play in influencing, via natural enemy movements, control of pest population numbers. In these areas and others, some form of marking and/or tracking of insect predators and parasitoids is usually required so that movements can be studied. This special issue considers the usefulness and limitations of marking and tracking techniques, through up-to-date reviews written by an international team of researchers who are actively involved in the study of predator and parasitoid ecology.

[1]  J. Hagler,et al.  A multiple ELISA system for simultaneously monitoring intercrop movement and feeding activity of mass-released insect predators , 2004 .

[2]  C. Pickett,et al.  The role of a rubidium marked natural enemy refuge in the establishment and movement of Bemisia parasitoids , 2004 .

[3]  K. Heinz,et al.  The use of C3 and C4 plants to study natural enemy movement and ecology, and its application to pest management , 2004 .

[4]  S. Wratten,et al.  ‘Beetle banks’ as refuges for beneficial arthropods in farmland: long‐term changes in predator communities and habitat , 2004 .

[5]  F. Wäckers,et al.  Gut sugar analysis in field-caught parasitoids: Adapting methods originally developed for biting flies , 2004 .

[6]  R. Didham,et al.  IMPROVED FITNESS OF APHID PARASITOIDS RECEIVING RESOURCE SUBSIDIES , 2004 .

[7]  S. Louda,et al.  Nontarget effects--the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[8]  S. Wratten,et al.  Non-target parasitism of the endemic New Zealand red admiral butterfly (Bassaris gonerilla) by the introduced biological control agent Pteromalus puparum , 2003 .

[9]  S. Wratten,et al.  Field boundaries as barriers to movement of hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in cultivated land , 2003, Oecologia.

[10]  S. Wratten,et al.  Abundance and species richness of field‐margin and pasture spiders (Araneae) in Canterbury, New Zealand , 2003 .

[11]  M. Tuda,et al.  Relative importance of weather and density dependence on the dispersal and on-plant activity of the predator Orius minutus , 2002, Population Ecology.

[12]  D. Goulson,et al.  Botanical diversity of beetle banks Effects of age and comparison with conventional arable field margins in southern UK , 2002 .

[13]  M. Hochberg,et al.  THE RISKS OF BIOCONTROL: TRANSIENT IMPACTS AND MINIMUM NONTARGET DENSITIES , 2002 .

[14]  S. Wratten,et al.  Habitat manipulation in lucerne Medicago sativa: arthropod population dynamics in harvested and ‘refuge’ crop strips , 2002 .

[15]  W. Fagan,et al.  Invasion theory and biological control , 2002 .

[16]  S. Wratten,et al.  Habitat manipulation in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.): Strip harvesting to enhance biological control of insect pests , 2001 .

[17]  C. Thomas,et al.  Density, distribution and dispersal of the carabid beetle Nebria brevicollis in two adjacent cereal fields , 2000 .

[18]  W. Weisser.  Metapopulation dynamics in an aphid‐parasitoid system , 2000 .

[19]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  Host–parasitoid population dynamics , 2000 .

[20]  Carsten Thies,et al.  Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems , 1999, Science.

[21]  A. MacLeod.  Attraction and retention of Episyrphus balteatus DeGeer (Diptera: Syrphidae) at an arable field margin with rich and poor floral resources , 1999 .

[22]  G. Lei,et al.  Behaviour of a specialist parasitoid, Cotesia melitaearum: from individual behaviour to metapopulation processes , 1999 .

[23]  M. Jervis.  Functional and evolutionary aspects of mouthpart structure in parasitoid wasps , 1998 .

[24]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Functional, evolutionary and ecological aspects of feeding-related mouthpart specializations in parasitoid flies , 1998 .

[25]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Host–parasitoid spatial models: the interplay of demographic stochasticity and dynamics , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  D. Baird,et al.  A morphometric method to assist in defining the South American origins of Microctonus hyperodae Loan (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) established in New Zealand , 1996 .

[27]  Z. Tu,et al.  Development of a monoclonal antibody to detect predation of the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci , 1993 .

[28]  M. Walton,et al.  A review of methods for determining dietary range in adult parasitoids , 1992, Entomophaga.

[29]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Floral resources for natural enemies: the effect of Phacelia tanacetifolia (Hydrophyllaceae) on within-field distribution of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae). , 1992 .

[30]  S. Wratten,et al.  Creation of island' habitats in farmland to manipulate populations of beneficial arthropods : predator densities and species composition , 1991 .

[31]  S. Wratten,et al.  Economic consequences of pesticide use for grain aphid control on winter wheat in 1984 in England , 1990 .

[32]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental risks of biological pest controls , 1984 .

[33]  S. Wratten,et al.  INTRA‐ AND INTER‐SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN CEREAL APHID LOW‐TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE , 1979 .

[34]  C. Krebs.  Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance , 1973 .

[35]  T. Southwood,et al.  Ecological Methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations , 1967, Pedobiologia.

[36]  M. Keller,et al.  Providing plant foods for natural enemies in farming systems: balancing practicalities and theory , 2005 .

[37]  Jana C. Lee,et al.  Use of behavioural and life-history studies to understand the effects of habitat manipulation. , 2003 .

[38]  S. Wratten,et al.  Multi-function agricultural biodiversity: pest management and other benefits , 2003 .

[39]  J. Holland.  Carabid beetles : Their ecology, survival and use in agroecosystems , 2002 .

[40]  J. Hagler,et al.  Methods for marking insects: current techniques and future prospects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[41]  D. Reynolds,et al.  Scale, dispersal and population structure. , 2001 .

[42]  D. Simberloff,et al.  The Frequency and Strength of Nontarget Effects of Invertebrate Biological Control Agents of Plant Pests and Weeds , 2000 .

[43]  M. Thomas,et al.  Nontarget effects in the biocontrol of insects with insects, nematodes and microbial agents: the evidence. , 2000 .

[44]  E. Marshall,et al.  Distribution, Dispersal and Population Size of the Ground Beetles, Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) and Harpalus rufipes (Degeer) (Coleoptera, Carabidae), in Field Margin Habitats , 1997 .