Nonadherence in Hypertension: How to Develop and Implement Chemical Adherence Testing.

Nonadherence to antihypertensive medication is common, especially in those with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (true treatment-resistant hypertension requires exclusion of nonadherence), and its routine detection is supported by clinical guidelines. Chemical adherence testing is a reliable and valid method to detect adherence, yet methods are unstandardized and are not ubiquitous. This article describes the principles of chemical adherence testing for hypertensive patients and provides a set of recommendations for centers wishing to develop the test. We recommend testing should be done in either of two instances: (1) in those who have resistant hypertension or (2) in those on 2 antihypertensives who have a less than 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure on addition of the second antihypertensive medication. Furthermore, we recommend that verbal consent is secured before undertaking the test, and the results should be discussed with the patient. Based on medications prescribed in United Kingdom, European Union, and United States, we list top 20 to 24 drugs that cover >95% of hypertension prescriptions which may be included in the testing panel. Information required to identify these medications on mass spectrometry platforms is likewise provided. We discuss issues related to ethics, sample collection, transport, stability, urine versus blood samples, qualitative versus quantitative testing, pharmacokinetics, instrumentation, validation, quality assurance, and gaps in knowledge. We consider how to best present, interpret, and discuss chemical adherence test results with the patient. In summary, this guidance should help clinicians and their laboratories in the development of chemical adherence testing of prescribed antihypertensive drugs.

[1]  K. Khunti,et al.  Biochemical Urine Testing of Medication Adherence and Its Association With Clinical Markers in an Outpatient Population of Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Analysis in the DIAbetes and LifEstyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT) , 2021, Diabetes Care.

[2]  Sathish Kumar Jayapal,et al.  Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019 , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  W. Spiering,et al.  Plasma Trough Concentrations of Antihypertensive Drugs for the Assessment of Treatment Adherence , 2020, Hypertension.

[4]  W. Spiering,et al.  Plasma trough concentrations of antihypertensive drugs for the assessment of treatment adherence: a meta-analysis , 2020 .

[5]  E. Halm,et al.  Assessment of patient and provider attitudes towards therapeutic drug monitoring to improve medication adherence in low-income patients with hypertension: a qualitative study , 2020, BMJ Open.

[6]  N. Obermüller,et al.  Benefit of serum drug monitoring complementing urine analysis to assess adherence to antihypertensive drugs in first-line therapy , 2020, PloS one.

[7]  J. McMurray,et al.  Adherence to prescribed medications in patients with heart failure - insights from liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based urine analysis. , 2020, European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.

[8]  E. Boersma,et al.  Clinical Applicability of Monitoring Antihypertensive Drug Levels in Blood , 2020, Hypertension.

[9]  P. Wallemacq,et al.  Assessment of adherence to diuretics and β-blockers by serum drug monitoring in comparison to urine analysis , 2020, Blood pressure.

[10]  Dorairaj Prabhakaran,et al.  2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. , 2020, Hypertension.

[11]  D. Webb,et al.  Nonadherence to antihypertensive medications is related to pill burden in apparent treatment-resistant hypertensive individuals. , 2020, Journal of Hypertension.

[12]  R. Kreutz,et al.  Antihypertensive Drugs , 2020, Encyclopedia of Molecular Pharmacology.

[13]  J. Drewe,et al.  Clinical relevance of St. John's wort drug interactions revisited , 2019, British journal of pharmacology.

[14]  N. Obermüller,et al.  Evaluation of the dose-related concentration approach in therapeutic drug monitoring of diuretics and β-blockers – drug classes with low adherence in antihypertensive therapy , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[15]  P. Patel,et al.  1424The diagnosis of non-adherence in hypertension using a urine biochemical screen is unaffected by drug pharmacokinetics , 2019, European Heart Journal.

[16]  E. Dolan,et al.  Measuring adherence to therapy in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: a feasibility study in Irish primary care. , 2019, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[17]  W. Spiering,et al.  Screening of cardiovascular agents in plasma with LC-MS/MS: A valuable tool for objective drug adherence assessment. , 2019, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[18]  J. Staessen,et al.  Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension in the INSPiRED pilot study , 2019, Blood pressure.

[19]  K. Khunti,et al.  Objective measures of non-adherence in cardiometabolic diseases: a review focused on urine biochemical screening , 2019, Patient preference and adherence.

[20]  I. Dasgupta,et al.  Medication adherence and treatment-resistant hypertension: a review , 2019, Drugs in context.

[21]  P. Patel,et al.  Cardiovascular Medication Stability in Urine for Non-Adherence Screening by LC-MS-MS. , 2018, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[22]  Thomas Kahan,et al.  [2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension]. , 2019, Kardiologia polska.

[23]  B. Vogt,et al.  Medication adherence during laboratory workup for primary aldosteronism: pilot study , 2018, Patient preference and adherence.

[24]  B. Egan,et al.  Cost-Utility of an Objective Biochemical Measure to Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment. , 2018, Hypertension.

[25]  K. Khunti,et al.  Cost-Utility of an Objective Biochemical Measure to Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment , 2018, Hypertension.

[26]  K. Khunti,et al.  High rates of non-adherence to antidiabetic, antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes revealed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (lc-ms/ms) urine analysis , 2018, Atherosclerosis Supplements.

[27]  G. Lip,et al.  2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. , 2018, European heart journal.

[28]  G. Lawson,et al.  Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) coupled with high-resolution, accurate-mass (HRAM) mass spectrometry as a simplified alternative to dried blood spot (DBS) analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring of cardiovascular drugs , 2018, Clinical Mass Spectrometry.

[29]  H. Durand,et al.  Medication adherence for resistant hypertension: Assessing theoretical predictors of adherence using direct and indirect adherence measures , 2018, British journal of health psychology.

[30]  B. Vogt,et al.  Indexed plasma drug concentrations for drug adherence screening in hypertensive patients. , 2018, Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie.

[31]  Fernando Fernandez-Llimos,et al.  Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review , 2018, BMJ Open.

[32]  R. Kreutz,et al.  Single-Pill Triple Fixed Dose Combination Therapy with Single Component Drug Monitoring in Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: A Pilot Study. , 2017, Current vascular pharmacology.

[33]  P. Patel,et al.  Measurements of Antihypertensive Medications in Blood and Urine , 2018 .

[34]  M. Bots,et al.  Medication adherence in patients with apparent resistant hypertension: findings from the SYMPATHY trial , 2018, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[35]  J. Newell,et al.  Medication adherence among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of hypertension.

[36]  E. Sturrock,et al.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of amlodipine and the Z-FHL/HHL ratio: Adherence tools in patients referred for apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. , 2017, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[37]  S. Laurent,et al.  Routine urinary detection of antihypertensive drugs for systematic evaluation of adherence to treatment in hypertensive patients , 2017, Journal of hypertension.

[38]  N. Samani,et al.  Biochemical Screening for Nonadherence Is Associated With Blood Pressure Reduction and Improvement in Adherence , 2017, Hypertension.

[39]  G. di Perri,et al.  UHPLC–MS/MS method with sample dilution to test therapeutic adherence through quantification of ten antihypertensive drugs in urine samples , 2017, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[40]  G. Lawson,et al.  Quantitative LC–HRMS determination of selected cardiovascular drugs, in dried blood spots, as an indicator of adherence to medication , 2017, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[41]  N. Samani,et al.  Risk Factors for Nonadherence to Antihypertensive Treatment , 2017, Hypertension.

[42]  A. Salomone,et al.  European guidelines for workplace drug testing in urine. , 2017, Drug testing and analysis.

[43]  U. Martin,et al.  Detecting non-adherence by urine analysis in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: rates, reasons and reactions , 2017, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[44]  P. Patel,et al.  Reply to "A Novel 'Dilute-and-Shoot' Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Screening of Antihypertensive Drugs in Urine". , 2017, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[45]  G. Reed Stability of Drugs, Drug Candidates, and Metabolites in Blood and Plasma , 2016, Current protocols in pharmacology.

[46]  R. Horne,et al.  How to Screen for Non-Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy , 2016, Current Hypertension Reports.

[47]  P. Gosse,et al.  Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment and the Blood Pressure–Lowering Effects of Renal Denervation in the Renal Denervation for Hypertension (DENERHTN) Trial , 2016, Circulation.

[48]  J. Staessen,et al.  Evaluation of Adherence Should Become an Integral Part of Assessment of Patients With Apparently Treatment-Resistant Hypertension , 2016, Hypertension.

[49]  M. Bouvy,et al.  Proposal of Standardization to Assess Adherence With Medication Records , 2016, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[50]  I. Dasgupta,et al.  Non-adherence to antihypertensive medication is very common among resistant hypertensives: results of a directly observed therapy clinic , 2016, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[51]  B. Williams,et al.  Screening for non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment as a part of the diagnostic pathway to renal denervation , 2015, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[52]  I. Dasgupta,et al.  A Novel 'Dilute-and-Shoot' Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Screening of Antihypertensive Drugs in Urine. , 2015, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[53]  M. Meyer,et al.  Orbitrap technology for comprehensive metabolite-based liquid chromatographic-high resolution-tandem mass spectrometric urine drug screening - exemplified for cardiovascular drugs. , 2015, Analytica chimica acta.

[54]  M. Burnier,et al.  Blood pressure reductions following catheter-based renal denervation are not related to improvements in adherence to antihypertensive drugs measured by urine/plasma toxicological analysis , 2015, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[55]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Non-adherence to cardiovascular medications. , 2014, European heart journal.

[56]  Supinya Dechanont,et al.  Hospital admissions/visits associated with drug–drug interactions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2014, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[57]  Nilesh J Samani,et al.  High rates of non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HP LC-MS/MS) urine analysis , 2014, Heart.

[58]  A. Farmer,et al.  Does Electronic Monitoring Influence Adherence to Medication? Randomized Controlled Trial of Measurement Reactivity , 2014, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[59]  R. Haynes,et al.  Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[60]  L. Kux OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration , 2014 .

[61]  T. Zelinka,et al.  Precise assessment of noncompliance with the antihypertensive therapy in patients with resistant hypertension using toxicological serum analysis , 2013, Journal of hypertension.

[62]  J. Urquhart,et al.  Identification and Assessment of Adherence-Enhancing Interventions in Studies Assessing Medication Adherence Through Electronically Compiled Drug Dosing Histories: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, Drugs.

[63]  S. Toennes,et al.  Resistant hypertension? Assessment of adherence by toxicological urine analysis , 2013, Journal of hypertension.

[64]  Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) standard practices for method validation in forensic toxicology. , 2013, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[65]  M. Heisler,et al.  Physician assessments of medication adherence and decisions to intensify medications for patients with uncontrolled blood pressure: still no better than a coin toss , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[66]  M. Schulz,et al.  Therapeutic and toxic blood concentrations of nearly 1,000 drugs and other xenobiotics , 2012, Critical Care.

[67]  J. Urquhart,et al.  Adherence to medications: insights arising from studies on the unreliable link between prescribed and actual drug dosing histories. , 2012, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[68]  J. Honour Development and validation of a quantitative assay based on tandem mass spectrometry , 2011, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[69]  J. Ceral,et al.  Difficult-to-control arterial hypertension or uncooperative patients? The assessment of serum antihypertensive drug levels to differentiate non-responsiveness from non-adherence to recommended therapy , 2011, Hypertension Research.

[70]  M. I. Maguregui,et al.  LC-MS/MS method for the determination of several drugs used in combined cardiovascular therapy in human plasma. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[71]  T. Arndt Urine-creatinine concentration as a marker of urine dilution: reflections using a cohort of 45,000 samples. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[72]  Olaf H Drummer,et al.  Validation of new methods. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[73]  R. Schmieder,et al.  Guidelines for management of arterial hypertension , 2007 .

[74]  R. Alonso,et al.  Instability of calcium channel antagonists during sample preparation for LC-MS-MS analysis of serum samples. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[75]  C. Lewis,et al.  A summary of the effects of antihypertensive medications on measured blood pressure. , 2005, American journal of hypertension.

[76]  G. Hasenfuss,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of hydrochlorothiazide in relation to renal function , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[77]  S. De Geest,et al.  Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action , 2003, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[78]  A. Badwan,et al.  Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for determination of amlodipine in plasma , 2001, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[79]  B. Lerner,et al.  From careless consumptives to recalcitrant patients: the historical construction of noncompliance. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[80]  J. D. Robinson,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF ACE INHIBITORS BY IMMUNOASSAY , 1988 .

[81]  J. Landon,et al.  Direct Determination of Propranolol in Serum or Plasma by Fluoroimmunoassay , 1981, Therapeutic drug monitoring.