Experimental analysis and modeling of single-cell time-course data

Abstract Contemporary single-cell experiments produce vast amounts of data, but the interpretation of these data is far from straightforward. In particular, understanding mechanisms and sources of cell-to-cell variability, given highly complex and nonlinear cellular networks, precludes intuitive interpretation. It requires careful computational and mathematical analysis instead. Here, we discuss different types of single-cell data and computational, model-based methods currently used to analyze them. We argue that mechanistic models incorporating subpopulation or cell-specific parameters can help to identify sources of variation and to understand experimentally observed behaviors. We highlight how data types and qualities, together with the nonlinearity of single-cell dynamics, make it challenging to identify the correct underlying biological mechanisms and we outline avenues to address these challenges.

[1]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[2]  Joerg Stelling,et al.  A Simple and Flexible Computational Framework for Inferring Sources of Heterogeneity from Single-Cell Dynamics. , 2019, Cell systems.

[3]  Karen Sachs,et al.  Multiplexed mass cytometry profiling of cellular states perturbed by small-molecule regulators , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Tim Wildey,et al.  Optimal experimental design for prediction based on push-forward probability measures , 2020, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  Gunnar Cedersund,et al.  Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling for single cell estimation: when, why, and how to use it , 2015, BMC Systems Biology.

[6]  Simon Tavener,et al.  A Monte Carlo method to estimate cell population heterogeneity from cell snapshot data. , 2020, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Jan Hasenauer,et al.  A Hierarchical, Data-Driven Approach to Modeling Single-Cell Populations Predicts Latent Causes of Cell-To-Cell Variability. , 2018, Cell systems.

[8]  E. Voit,et al.  Multidimensional single-cell modeling of cellular signaling , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  Erik Sundström,et al.  RNA velocity of single cells , 2018, Nature.

[10]  Alexey M. Kozlov,et al.  Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science , 2020, Genome Biology.

[11]  Jan Hasenauer,et al.  Robust calibration of hierarchical population models for heterogeneous cell populations. , 2019, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data , 1996 .

[13]  Doraiswami Ramkrishna,et al.  Bistability versus Bimodal Distributions in Gene Regulatory Processes from Population Balance , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Jan Hasenauer,et al.  Mathematical modeling of variability in intracellular signaling , 2019, Current Opinion in Systems Biology.

[15]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[16]  R. Baker,et al.  Mechanistic models versus machine learning, a fight worth fighting for the biological community? , 2018, Biology Letters.

[17]  Mattias Goksör,et al.  A Nonlinear Mixed Effects Approach for Modeling the Cell-To-Cell Variability of Mig1 Dynamics in Yeast , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data: An overview and update , 2003 .

[19]  Stavroula Skylaki,et al.  Challenges in long-term imaging and quantification of single-cell dynamics , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Marc S. Sherman,et al.  Cell-to-cell variability in the propensity to transcribe explains correlated fluctuations in gene expression. , 2015, Cell systems.

[21]  M. Peter,et al.  Scalable inference of heterogeneous reaction kinetics from pooled single-cell recordings , 2013, Nature Methods.

[22]  Jana Wolf,et al.  A systematic approach to decipher crosstalk in the p53 signaling pathway using single cell dynamics , 2020, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  Sarah Filippi,et al.  Robustness of MEK-ERK Dynamics and Origins of Cell-to-Cell Variability in MAPK Signaling , 2016, Cell reports.

[24]  Eugenia Lyashenko,et al.  Maximum Entropy Framework for Predictive Inference of Cell Population Heterogeneity and Responses in Signaling Networks. , 2019, Cell systems.

[25]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[26]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  Stochastic models for single‐cell data: Current challenges and the way forward , 2021, The FEBS journal.

[27]  Lingchong You,et al.  Predictive power of cell-to-cell variability , 2013, Quantitative Biology.

[28]  Frank Allgöwer,et al.  Identification of models of heterogeneous cell populations from population snapshot data , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[29]  D. Dey,et al.  Approximate Inferences for Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models with Scale Mixtures of Skew-Normal Distributions , 2020, Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice.

[30]  Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo,et al.  Mechanistic models of cell-fate transitions from single-cell data , 2021 .

[31]  J. Lygeros,et al.  Moment-based inference predicts bimodality in transient gene expression , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Eugenio Cinquemani,et al.  What Population Reveals about Individual Cell Identity: Single-Cell Parameter Estimation of Models of Gene Expression in Yeast , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  L. Aarons,et al.  What do we mean by identifiability in mixed effects models? , 2015, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[34]  Eugenio Cinquemani,et al.  Inheritance and variability of kinetic gene expression parameters in microbial cells: modeling and inference from lineage tree data , 2019, Bioinform..

[35]  Zaida Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Careful accounting of extrinsic noise in protein expression reveals correlations among its sources. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[36]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? , 2010, Cell.

[37]  Steffen Waldherr,et al.  Estimation methods for heterogeneous cell population models in systems biology , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  L. Tsimring,et al.  A programmable fate decision landscape underlies single-cell aging in yeast , 2020, Science.

[39]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[40]  R. Milo,et al.  Noise in gene expression is coupled to growth rate , 2015, Genome research.

[41]  C. J. Zopf,et al.  Cell-Cycle Dependence of Transcription Dominates Noise in Gene Expression , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Thomas S. Ligon,et al.  Multi-experiment nonlinear mixed effect modeling of single-cell translation kinetics after transfection , 2018, npj Systems Biology and Applications.

[43]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Models of stochastic gene expression , 2005 .

[44]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Generalizing RNA velocity to transient cell states through dynamical modeling , 2019, bioRxiv.

[45]  Jennifer J. Linderman,et al.  Computational methods for characterizing and learning from heterogeneous cell signaling data. , 2021, Current opinion in systems biology.