Timber Semirigid Frame Connection with Improved Deformation Capacity and Ductility

The present study deals with the innovation and the possibilities of improving the design solution of a frame connection for two selected types of fasteners. All specimens were made of glued laminated timber. Dowel-type mechanical fasteners, a combination of bolts and dowels, and full-threaded screws were used for the connection. The main goal of this research was to replace the typical solution (common dowel-type fasteners) with a more modern, faster, and easier solution in order to improve the load-carrying capacity, ductility, and deformation capacity of this type of frame connection. This article also aimed to provide a detailed evaluation of the mechanical properties of the used glued laminated timber and fasteners in order to comprehensively evaluate the research task. For the design solution, a frame connection created from a system of two struts and a partition was chosen as the basis of the experimental program. Dowel-type mechanical fasteners, as well as combinations of bolts and dowels, were used for the connection; however, in addition to these standardly used mechanical fasteners, full-threaded screws were used. The article describes the use of static destructive testing to determine the ductility of the connection, considering different variations in the strengthening of the individual segments of the mentioned connection means. In the first variation, the individual components of the frame were not reinforced in any way. In the second, the crossbar was reinforced with two full-threaded bolts. In the third, the webs and the crossbar were reinforced with two full-threaded bolts. In the article, these ductility values were compared with each other and the procedure was set by the currently valid standard.

[1]  P. Dobeš,et al.  Load-Carrying Capacity of Double-Shear Bolted Connections with Slotted-In Steel Plates in Squared and Round Timber Based on the Experimental Testing, European Yield Model, and Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics , 2022, Materials.

[2]  O. Sucharda,et al.  Rotational Stiffness and Carrying Capacity of Timber Frame Corners with Dowel Type Connections , 2021, Materials.

[3]  Enchun Zhu,et al.  Analysis and test of stiffness of bolted connections in timber structures , 2021 .

[4]  Shu-Rong Zhou,et al.  Effects of bolted connections on behaviour of timber frames under combined vertical and lateral loads , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.

[5]  T. Nowak,et al.  Estimating Mechanical Properties of Wood in Existing Structures—Selected Aspects , 2021, Materials.

[6]  O. Sucharda,et al.  Analysis of Rotational Stiffness of the Timber Frame Connection , 2020, Sustainability.

[7]  P. Dobeš,et al.  Effects of Loaded End Distance and Moisture Content on the Behavior of Bolted Connections in Squared and Round Timber Subjected to Tension Parallel to the Grain , 2020, Materials.

[8]  B. Young,et al.  Effects of end distance on thin sheet steel bolted connections , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[9]  Jochen Köhler,et al.  Assessment of the failure behaviour and reliability of timber connections with multiple dowel-type fasteners , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[10]  Michael Schweigler,et al.  Engineering modeling of semi-rigid joints with dowel-type fasteners for nonlinear analysis of timber structures , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[11]  J. Estévez-Cimadevila,et al.  Joints with bars glued-in softwood laminated timber subjected to climatic cycles , 2018 .

[12]  M. A. Bjertnæs,et al.  Some structural design issues of the 14-storey timber framed building “Treet” in Norway , 2016, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

[13]  R. Crocetti.  Large-Span Timber Structures , 2016 .

[14]  Thierry Descamps,et al.  Reinforcement of dowel type connections , 2015 .

[15]  Philipp Dietsch,et al.  Self-tapping screws and threaded rods as reinforcement for structural timber elements – A state-of-the-art report , 2015 .

[16]  Erik Serrano,et al.  Strengthening of timber structures with glued-in rods , 2015 .

[17]  A. Jorissen,et al.  General notes on ductility in timber structures , 2011 .

[18]  H. Blass,et al.  Ductility aspects of reinforced and non-reinforced timber joints , 2011 .

[19]  Eva Frühwald Hansson,et al.  Analysis of structural failures in timber structures: Typical causes for failure and failure modes , 2011 .

[20]  Ulrike Kuhlmann,et al.  Consideration of plasticity within the design of timber structures due to connection ductility , 2011 .

[21]  Kjell Arne Malo,et al.  Quantifying ductility in timber structures , 2011 .

[22]  P. Racher,et al.  Analysis of dowelled timber to timber moment-resisting joints , 2007 .

[23]  O. Sucharda,et al.  Determination of carrying capacity of steel-timber joints with steel rods glued-in parallel to grain , 2016 .

[24]  A. Pozgaj,et al.  Wood Properties of Spruce from Forests Affected by Pollution in Czechoslovakia , 1986 .