Syntactic movement in orally trained children with hearing impairment.

This study explored the comprehension and production of sentences derived by syntactic movement, in orally trained school-age Hebrew-speaking children with moderate to profound hearing impairment, aged 7;8-9;9 years. Experiments 1 and 2 tested the comprehension of relative clauses and topicalization sentences (with word orders of OVS [object, verb, subject] and OSV [object, subject, verb]) using a sentence-picture matching task. Experiments 3 and 4 tested the production of relative clauses using two elicitation tasks. Experiment 5 tested the comprehension of relative clauses with and without resumptive pronouns. As a group, the children with hearing loss failed to understand object relatives and OVS topicalization sentences. In the production tasks they either avoided producing a sentence with syntactic movement, by using a relative clauses with a resumptive pronoun instead of a gap or by producing a sentence without a relative clause, or produced ungrammatical sentences. They understood correctly object relatives with resumptive pronouns, which are not derived by movement. Both comprehension and production of the hearing-impaired group was significantly different from that of the hearing control group. Individual performance was strongly correlated with the age of intervention: only children who received hearing aids before the age of 8 months performed well in the comprehension tasks. Type of hearing aid, duration of use of a cochlear implant, and degree of hearing loss did not correlate with syntactic comprehension.

[1]  S P Quigley,et al.  Comprehension of relativized sentences by deaf students. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  D. Swinney,et al.  An On-Line Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia , 1993, Brain and Language.

[3]  U. Shlonsky.  Null and displaced subjects , 1987 .

[4]  R. Wilbur,et al.  Question formation in the language of deaf students. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  K. Amunts,et al.  Broca's region , 2006 .

[6]  R. Calderon,et al.  Further Support for the Benefits of Early Identification and Intervention for Children with Hearing Loss. , 1999 .

[7]  E. Lenneberg.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[8]  R. Love,et al.  Underlying grammatical rule structure in the deaf. , 1974, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.

[9]  A. Geers,et al.  Syntactic maturity of spontaneous speech and elicited imitations of hearing-impaired children. , 1978, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[10]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Critical Evidence , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  J. B. Brannon.  Linguistic word classes in the spoken language of normal, hard-of-hearing, and deaf children. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  Annie Zaenen,et al.  String-Vacuous Rule Application , 2008 .

[13]  C. Yoshinaga-Itano,et al.  From Screening to Early Identification and Intervention: Discovering Predictors to Successful Outcomes for Children With Significant Hearing Loss. , 2003, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[14]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Question Production in Agrammatism: The Tree Pruning Hypothesis , 2002, Brain and Language.

[15]  Y. Grodzinsky.  The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  L P Shapiro,et al.  Training and generalized production of wh- and NP-movement structures in agrammatic aphasia. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  S P Quigley,et al.  Deaf children's acquisition of the passive voice. , 1973, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  P. Schmitt.  Deaf Children's Comprehension and Production of Sentence Transformations and Verb Tenses , 1969 .

[20]  C. Yoshinaga-Itano,et al.  Identification of Hearing Loss After Age 18 Months Is Not Early Enough , 1998, American annals of the deaf.

[21]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[22]  Michael Strong,et al.  Language Learning and Deafness , 1988 .

[23]  Ur Shlonsky,et al.  Verb second in Hebrew , 1992 .

[24]  M. Marschark,et al.  Discourse rules in the language productions of deaf and hearing children. , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  N Friedmann,et al.  Agrammatism and the Psychological Reality of the Syntactic Tree , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[26]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Željko Bošković,et al.  The copy theory of movement: A view from PF , 2007 .

[28]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  On Asymmetries Between Parasitic Gap and Across‐the‐board Constructions , 2002 .

[29]  S. Varlokosta,et al.  Resumptives and Wh-Movement in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Modern Greek and Hebrew , 1997 .

[30]  Letícia Maria Sicuro Corrêa,et al.  An alternative assessment of children's comprehension of relative clauses , 1995 .

[31]  K. Hansson,et al.  Comprehension and production of relative clauses: a comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[32]  U. Shlonsky.  Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic: An Essay in Comparative Semitic Syntax , 1997 .

[33]  Omer Preminger,et al.  Resumptive pronouns as a last resort when movement is impaired: relative clauses in hearing impairment , 2008 .

[34]  E. Dromi,et al.  Grammatical Deviations in the Spoken and Written Language of Hebrew-Speaking Children With Hearing Impairments. , 2001, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[35]  Helen Tager-Flusberg,et al.  Constraints on Language Acquisition : Studies of Atypical Children , 1996 .

[36]  C. K. Thompson,et al.  Training Sentence Production in Agrammatism: Implications for Normal and Disordered Language , 1995, Brain and Language.

[37]  C. Adams.  Syntactic comprehension in children with expressive language impairment. , 1990, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[38]  Susan Rose,et al.  Language learning practices with deaf children , 1987 .

[39]  L. M. Pressnell.  Hearing-impaired children's comprehension and production of syntax in oral language. , 1973, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[40]  Jairo Nunes,et al.  Sideward Movement , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[41]  Ur Shlonsky,et al.  Resumptive pronouns as a last resort , 1992 .

[42]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[43]  Stavroula Stavrakaki,et al.  Comprehension of Reversible Relative Clauses in Specifically Language Impaired and Normally Developing Greek Children , 2001, Brain and Language.

[44]  Evan Kidd,et al.  English-Speaking Children's Comprehension of Relative Clauses: Evidence for General-Cognitive and Language-Specific Constraints on Development , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[45]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Step by step : essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik , 2000 .

[46]  Brian Agbayani,et al.  Wh-Subjects in English and the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[47]  A Wingfield,et al.  The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the elderly , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[48]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[49]  T. Murry,et al.  The Spoken Syntax of Normal, Hard-of-Hearing, and Deaf Children , 1966 .

[50]  Christine Yoshinaga-Itano,et al.  The Development of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children Identified Early Through the High-Risk Registry , 1998, American annals of the deaf.