Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being: Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made

A satisfactory complete normative criterion for individualistic ethical decisionmaking under uncertainty such as Harsanyi’s (Journal of Political Economy , 1955) requires a single fundamental utility function for all individuals which is fully interpersonally comparable. The paper discusses reasons why interpersonal comparisons of utility (ICU’s) have been eschewed in the past and argues that most existing approaches, both empirical and ethical, to ICU’s are flawed. Either they confound facts with values, or they are based on unrealistic hypothetical decisions in an “original position”. Instead ICU’s need to be recognized for what they really are — preferences for different kinds of people. INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS OF UTILITY . . . I still believe that it is helpful to speak as if inter-personal comparisons of utility rest upon scientiAEc foundations – that is, upon observation or introspection. . . . I still think, when I make interpersonal comparisons . . . that my judgments are more like judgments of value than judgments of veriAEable fact. Nevertheless, to those of my friends who think differently, I would urge that, in practice, our difference is not very important. They think that propositions based upon the assumption of equality are essentially part of economic science. I think that the assumption of equality comes from outside, and that its justiAEcation is more ethical than scientiAEc. But we all agree that it is AEtting that such assumptions should be made and their implications explored with the aid of the economist’s technique. — Robbins (1938, pp. 640–641)

[1]  P. Hammond Independence of irrelevant interpersonal comparisons , 1991 .

[2]  R. Nozick Interpersonal utility theory , 1985 .

[3]  Louis Narens,et al.  How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utility , 1983 .

[4]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Bayesian Decision Theory and Utilitarian Ethics , 1978 .

[5]  Y. Ng Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions and Social Welfare Functions , 1975 .

[6]  W. Jevons Theory of Political Economy , 1965 .

[7]  P. Hammond Consequentialist demographic norms and parenting rights. , 1988, Social choice and welfare.

[8]  R. Aumann On the Non-transferable Utility Value: A Comment on the Roth-Shafer Examples [Values for Games without Side Payments: Some Difficulties with Current Concepts] [On the Existence and Interpretation of Value Allocations] , 1985 .

[9]  Lloyd S. Shapley,et al.  Utility comparisons and the theory of games , 1988 .

[10]  J. Harsanyi Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955 .

[11]  J. Solterer,et al.  The Economics of Justice , 1991 .

[12]  Robert H. Strotz How Income Ought To Be Distributed: Paradox Regained , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  John Rawls,et al.  Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice , 1973 .

[14]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  Consequentialism and the Independence Axiom , 1988 .

[15]  William Vickrey,et al.  Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules , 1960 .

[16]  The Maximum Claims of Gauthier's Bargainers: Are the Fixed Social Inequalities Acceptable? , 1982, Dialogue.

[17]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[18]  I. Waldner The Empirical Meaningfulness of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons , 1972 .

[19]  A. Hirayama INTERPERSONAL COMPARISON AND CRITERIA OF JUSTICE , 1983 .

[20]  Paul Weirich,et al.  Utility Tempered with Equality , 1983 .

[21]  O. Lange,et al.  Scope and Method of Economics , 1938, Nature.

[22]  Arnold C. Harberger Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay , 1971 .

[23]  B. V. Praag,et al.  Individual welfare functions and consumer behavior. : A theory of rational irrationality. , 1968 .

[24]  A. Sen,et al.  Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .

[25]  Amartya Sen,et al.  The Living Standard , 1984 .

[26]  I. Introduction CAN THE MAXIMIN PRINCIPLE SERVE AS A BASIS FOR MORALITY? A CRITIQUE OF JOHN RAWLS'S THEORY*§ , 1980 .

[27]  B. Fine A Note on "Interpersonal Aggregation and Partial Comparability" , 1975 .

[28]  Daniel M. Hausman,et al.  The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology , 1984 .

[29]  Mamoru Kaneko,et al.  On interpersonal utility comparisons , 1984 .

[30]  P. Samuelson,et al.  Foundations of Economic Analysis. , 1948 .

[31]  George R. Feiwel,et al.  Arrow and the foundations of the theory of economic policy , 1987 .

[32]  A. Kapteyn,et al.  A new approach to the construction of family equivalence scales , 1978 .

[33]  Social Welfare and Interpersonal Utility Comparisons in Applied Policy Research , 1988 .

[34]  Amartya Sen,et al.  On Ethics and Economics , 1988 .

[35]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Bayesian Decision Theory, Rule Utilitarianism, And Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem , 1979 .

[36]  R. Cooter,et al.  Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics , 1984 .

[37]  C. L. Sheng A note on interpersonal comparisons of utility , 1987 .

[38]  Leo Grebler Some Fundamental Issues , 1960 .

[39]  A. Lerner,et al.  The Economics and Politics of Consumer Sovereignty , 1972 .

[40]  J. Milnor,et al.  AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO MEASURABLE UTILITY , 1953 .

[41]  A. Kapteyn A theory of preference formation , 1979 .

[42]  A. Sen,et al.  Utilitarianism and Beyond , 1982 .

[43]  J. Muellbauer Inequality Measures, Prices and Household Composition , 1974 .

[44]  J. Eatwell,et al.  Welfare Economics , 2020, Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Third Edition.

[45]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  Equity in Two Person Situations: Some Consequences , 1979 .

[46]  Robert A. Pollak,et al.  Habit formation and long-run utility functions☆ , 1976 .

[47]  L. Robbins,et al.  Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment , 1938 .

[48]  Charles Blackorby,et al.  Ratio-Scale and Translation-Scale Full Interpersonal Comparability without Domain Restrictions: Admissible Social-Evaluation Functions , 1982 .

[49]  Extended Sympathy and Interpersonal Utility Comparisons , 1986 .

[50]  The Economics of Control , 1975 .

[51]  C. L. Sheng Some quantitative concepts of value and utility from a utilitarian point of view , 1989 .

[52]  A. Sen,et al.  Choice, Welfare and Measurement , 1982 .

[53]  Thomas Schwartz,et al.  On the possibility of rational policy evaluation , 1970 .

[54]  P. Weirich Interpersonal utility in principles of social choice , 1984 .

[55]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Welfare Economics of Variable Tastes , 1953 .

[56]  H. Guitton,et al.  Planner’s Preferences, Optimality, Distribution and Social Welfare , 1969 .

[57]  J. Tinbergen TWO APPROACHES TO QUANTIFY THE CONCEPT OF EQUITABLE INCOME DISTRIBUTION , 1980 .

[58]  W. M. Gorman A Possible Procedure for Analysing Quality Differentials in the Egg Market , 1980 .

[59]  Claude d'Aspremont,et al.  Axioms for social welfare orderings. In Leonid Hurwicz, David Schmeidler and Hugo Sonnenschein (eds.), Social Goals and Social Organization , 1985 .

[60]  Mathematical Investigation in the Theory of Value and Prices , 1927 .

[61]  P. Dasgupta On some problems arising from Professor Rawls' conception of distributive justice , 1974 .

[62]  A. Sen,et al.  Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem , 1974 .

[63]  Amartya Sen,et al.  The Standard of Living: Contents , 1987 .

[64]  J. Rawls Justice as Fairness , 2001 .

[65]  Martin Hollis,et al.  Philosophy and economic theory , 1980 .

[66]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[67]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  On Reconciling Arrow’s Theory of Social Choice with Harsanyi’s Fundamental Utilitarianism , 1987 .

[68]  D. Wittman Punishment as retribution , 1974 .

[69]  J. Muellbauer Household composition, Engel curves and welfare comparisons between households: A duality approach , 1974 .

[70]  P. Hammond Straightforward Individual Incentive Compatibility in Large Economies , 1979 .

[71]  Friederich Baerwald The Economics of Control , 1947 .

[72]  P. Hammond Dual interpersonal comparisons of utility and the welfare economics of income distribution , 1977 .

[73]  P. Hammond Consequentialist social norms for public decisions , 1984 .

[74]  Allan Gibbard Preference strength and two kinds of ordinalism , 1978 .

[75]  Kevin Roberts,et al.  Possibility Theorems with Interpersonally Comparable Welfare Levels , 1980 .

[76]  Social decision making in the presence of complex goals, ethics and the environment , 1979 .

[77]  Eric Maskin Decision-Making Under Ignorance with Implications for Social Choice , 1979 .

[78]  R. Burkhardt Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation , 1977 .

[79]  Grethe Peterson,et al.  The Tanner Lectures on Human Values , 1988 .

[80]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  The Economics of Justice and the Criterion of Wealth Maximization , 1982 .

[81]  J. Roemer Equality of Resources Implies Equality of Welfare , 1986 .

[82]  L. Robbins,et al.  An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. , 1934 .

[83]  K. Lancaster A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[84]  Joseph B. Kadane,et al.  You have printed the following article : On the Shared Preferences of Two Bayesian Decision Makers , 2008 .

[85]  Jerome Rothenberg,et al.  The measurement of social welfare , 1963 .

[86]  I. Waldner Bare preference and interpersonal utility comparisons , 1974 .

[87]  T. Scanlon Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being: The moral basis of interpersonal comparisons , 1991 .

[88]  P. Hennipman A tale of two schools: Comments on a new view of the ordinalist revolution , 1987 .

[89]  E. Phelps RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN WELFARE ECONOMICS: JUSTICE ET ÉQUITÉ , 1980 .

[90]  I. Fisher Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices , 1893 .

[91]  Dorothy Mitchell A Theory of the Good and the Right , 1980 .

[92]  H. Brock A game theoretic account of social justice , 1979 .

[93]  Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utilities: A Note , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[94]  John A. Weymark,et al.  Social Choice with Interpersonal Utility Comparisons: A Diagrammatic Introduction , 1984 .

[95]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[96]  Kenneth J. Arrow Reflections on the Essays , 1987 .

[97]  Paul A. Samuelson,et al.  Sparks from Arrow’s Anvil , 1987 .

[98]  P. Hammond Equity, Arrow's Conditions, and Rawls' Difference Principle , 1976 .

[99]  J. Kelly Arrow Impossibility Theorems , 1978 .

[100]  A. C. M. Kennell Cognition and affect in perceptions of well-being , 1978 .

[101]  R. M. Hare,et al.  Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. , 1982 .

[102]  ‘Utilitarianism incorporating justice’ — A decentralised model of ethical decision making , 1990 .

[103]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[104]  Luis Toharia Interpersonal Welfare Comparisons and Welfare Economics: A Comment , 1978 .

[105]  P. Suppes,et al.  An Axiomatization of Utility Based on the Notion of Utility Differences , 1955 .

[106]  Robert J. Aumann,et al.  Power and Taxes , 1977 .

[107]  R. Dahl A Preface to Democratic Theory , 1956 .

[108]  R. Myerson Two-Person Bargaining Problems and Comparable Utility , 1977 .

[109]  David Lyons Rawls Versus Utilitarianism , 1972 .

[110]  A. Macintyre,et al.  FREEDOM AND REASON , 1963 .

[111]  C. John,et al.  Utilitarianism and beyond: Morality and the theory of rational behaviour , 1982 .

[112]  J. Muellbauer,et al.  On Measuring Child Costs: With Applications to Poor Countries , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[113]  Clifford Hildreth,et al.  Alternative Conditions for Social Orderings , 1953 .

[114]  Eric Maskin,et al.  A Theorem on Utilitarianism , 1978 .

[115]  E. Kalai,et al.  Monotonic Solutions to General Cooperative Games , 1985 .

[116]  Louis Guttman,et al.  On the Multivariate Structure of Wellbeing , 1975 .

[117]  Kevin Roberts,et al.  Social Choice Theory: The Single-profile and Multi-profile Approaches , 1980 .

[118]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Ethical Measurement of Inequality: Some Difficulties , 1978 .

[119]  S. Vajda,et al.  GAMES AND DECISIONS; INTRODUCTION AND CRITICAL SURVEY. , 1958 .

[120]  Y. Ng Interpersonal level comparability implies comparability of utility differences: A reply , 1984 .

[121]  L. Hurwicz,et al.  Social Goals and Social Organization , 1986 .

[122]  P. Hammond Markets as Constraints: Multilateral Incentive Compatibility in Continuum Economies , 1987 .

[123]  R S Downie,et al.  Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy , 1986, Ethics Beyond the Limits.

[124]  A. Camacho Individual Cardinal Utility, Interpersonal Comparisons, and Social Choice , 1986 .

[125]  P. Samuelson A Note on Measurement of Utility , 1937 .

[126]  Donald Wittman,et al.  A diagrammatic exposition of justice , 1979 .

[127]  N. Yannelis,et al.  Non-symmetric Cardinal Value Allocations , 1984 .

[128]  W. E. Armstrong UTILITY AND THE THEORY OF WELFARE , 1951 .

[129]  Peter A. Diamond,et al.  Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility: Comment , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.

[130]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Bayesian Equilibrium and Incentive-Compatibility: An Introduction , 1983 .

[131]  S. Strasnick Social Choice and the Derivation of Rawls's Difference Principle , 1976 .

[132]  R. Goodin How to Determine Who Should Get What , 1975, Ethics.

[133]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  Why ethical measures of inequality need interpersonal comparisons , 1976 .

[134]  J. Muellbauer Prices and Inequality: The United Kingdom Experience , 1974 .

[135]  L. Gevers,et al.  Leximin and utilitarian rules: A joint characterization , 1978 .

[136]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Welfare Functions Based on Individual Rankings , 1952, American Journal of Sociology.

[137]  M. Yaari,et al.  On dividing justly , 1984 .

[138]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Lives and well-being , 1988 .

[139]  Ordinal Interpersonal Comparisons in Bargaining , 1983 .

[140]  F. Fisher,et al.  How Income Ought to be Distributed: Paradox Lost , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.

[141]  T. Suzuki,et al.  Standard of Living , 1969 .

[142]  Bryan Magee,et al.  Modern British Philosophy , 1971 .

[143]  John S. Chipman,et al.  The New Welfare Economics, 1939-1974 , 1978 .

[144]  G. Mckenzie Applied Welfare Economics and Frisch’s Conjecture , 1988 .

[145]  J. Marcus Fleming Cardinal Welfare and Individualistic Ethics: A Comment , 1957, Journal of Political Economy.

[146]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice , 1978 .

[147]  E. Kalai Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons , 1977 .

[148]  Lars-Gunnar Svensson The utilitarian criterion, finite sensibility, and the weak majority preference principle , 1985 .

[149]  A. Lerner,et al.  The Economics of Control , 1944 .

[150]  Arie Kapteyn,et al.  Twelve thousand individual welfare functions , 1977 .

[151]  Abram Burk A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics , 1938 .

[152]  J. Muellbauer The Standard of Living: Professor Sen on the Standard of Living , 1987 .

[153]  H. Brock A critical discussion of the work of John C. Harsanyi , 1978 .

[154]  Anthony B. Atkinson,et al.  Income Distribution and Differences in Needs , 1987 .

[155]  J. Mirrlees,et al.  Utilitarianism and beyond: The economic uses of utilitarianism , 1982 .

[156]  E. Streller [De gustibus (non) est disputandum]. , 1962, Rontgen- und Laboratoriumspraxis.

[157]  J. Tinbergen Welfare Economics and Income Distribution , 1957 .

[158]  B. V. Praag,et al.  Individual Welfare Functions and Consumer Behaviour , 1972 .

[159]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  Ex-post optimality as a dynamically consistent objective for collective choice under uncertainty , 1983 .

[160]  L. Gevers,et al.  Separability, risk-bearing, and social welfare judgements , 1977 .

[161]  Yew-Kwang Ng,et al.  Expected subjective utility: Is the Neumann-Morgenstern utility the same as the Neoclassical's? , 1984 .

[162]  A. Hallam Measuring Economic Welfare: Is Theory a Cookbook for Empirical Analysis? , 1988 .

[163]  Th. Bezembinder,et al.  Factual versus representational utilities and their interdimensional comparisons , 1987 .

[164]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking , 1953, Journal of Political Economy.

[165]  R. Luce Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination , 1956 .

[166]  Vilfredo Pareto Il massimo di utilità per una collettività in sociologia , 1980 .

[167]  Kevin Roberts,et al.  Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory , 1980 .

[168]  A. Roth Values for Games without Sidepayments: Some Difficulties with Current Concepts , 1980 .

[169]  K. Arrow Individual Choice Under Certainty And Uncertainty , 1984 .

[170]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Utilitarianism, Egalitarianism, and the Timing Effect in Social Choice Problems , 1981 .

[171]  Fairness in the Real World: Rules, Choices, Expectations and Policies , 1987 .

[172]  Arie Kapteyn,et al.  Further evidence on the individual welfare function of income: An empirical investigatiion in The Netherlands , 1973 .

[173]  L. Gevers On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings , 1979 .

[174]  J. Elster,et al.  Foundations of Social Choice Theory , 1986 .

[175]  James Griffin,et al.  Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. , 1987 .

[176]  M. Yaari Rawls, edgeworth, shapley, nash: Theories of distributive justice re-examined , 1981 .

[177]  R F Atkinson,et al.  Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point , 1982 .

[178]  Making Economic Welfare Analysis Useful in the Policy Process: Implications of the Public Choice Literature , 1988 .

[179]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Nonlinear Social Welfare Functions: Do Welfare Economists Have a Special Exemption from Bayesian Rationality? , 1980 .

[180]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities, Risk Taking, and Welfare , 1987 .

[181]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Group Decision Making Using Cardinal Social Welfare Functions , 1975 .

[182]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  A metric for the social consensus. , 1966, Science.

[183]  George R. Feiwel,et al.  Issues in contemporary microeconomics and welfare , 1985 .

[184]  Lucian Kern Zur Axiomatischen Charakterisierung Alternativer Vertragsprinzipien , 1980 .

[185]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Justice , 1984 .

[186]  R. Sorensen Did the Intensity of My Preferences Double Last Night? , 1986, Philosophy of Science.

[187]  A. Michalos Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations , 1982 .

[188]  A. Sen On Economic Inequality , 1974 .

[189]  Terence J. Wales,et al.  Welfare Comparisons and Equivalence Scales , 1979 .

[190]  B. Fine A note on the measurement of inequality and interpersonal comparability , 1985 .

[191]  Y. Ng Value Judgments and Economists' Role in Policy Recommendation , 1972 .

[192]  Ikuo Horiguchi,et al.  At the University of California, Davis , 1981 .

[193]  On arguments from self-interest for the Nash solution and the Kalai egalitarian solution to the bargaining problem , 1987 .

[194]  P. Rappoport Reply to Professor Hennipman , 1988 .

[195]  R. Tollison,et al.  The utilitarian contract: A generalization of Rawls' theory of justice , 1974 .

[196]  R. Sugden Commodities and Capabilities , 1986 .

[197]  F. Fisher Household Equivalence Scales and Interpersonal Comparisons , 1987 .

[198]  Amartya Sen,et al.  On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis , 1977 .

[199]  Wayne Shafer,et al.  On the Existence and Interpretation of Value Allocation , 1980 .

[200]  Erik Schokkaert,et al.  Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justice , 1989 .

[201]  B.M.S. van Praag,et al.  Household Cost Functions And Equivalence Scales , 1985 .

[202]  P. Hammond Consequentialist foundations for expected utility , 1988 .

[203]  Robert H. Strotz How Income Ought to be Distributed: A Paradox in Distributive Ethics , 1958, Journal of Political Economy.

[204]  A. Ayer,et al.  Language, Truth and Logic. , 1939 .

[205]  P. Hammond Social Choice: the Science of the Impossible? , 1987 .

[206]  J. Simon Interpersonal Welfare Comparisons Can be Made-and Used for Redistribution Decisions , 1974 .

[207]  J. Muellbauer Testing the Barten Model of Household Composition Effects and the Cost of Children , 1977 .

[208]  G. Archibald Welfare Economics, Ethics, and Essentialism , 1959 .

[209]  Lloyd S. Shapley,et al.  The Shapley value: Utility comparison and the theory of games , 1967 .

[210]  Yew-Kwang Ng,et al.  Arrow’s Independence Condition and the Bergson—Samuelson Tradition , 1987 .

[211]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[212]  W. Vickrey Measuring Marginal Utility by Reactions to Risk , 1945 .

[213]  P. Pattanaik Risk, Impersonality, and the Social Welfare Function , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[214]  A. Sen,et al.  Interpersonal Aggregation and Partial Comparability , 1970 .

[215]  C. d'Aspremont,et al.  Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice , 1977 .

[216]  S. Gordon John Rawls's Difference Principle, Utilitarianism, and the Optimum Degree of Inequality , 1973 .

[217]  R. Aumann A COMMENT ON THE ROTH-SHAFER EXAMPLES' , 1985 .

[218]  Y. Ng Some Fundamental Issues in Social Welfare , 1985 .

[219]  G. Duncan,et al.  The Perception of Poverty. , 1987 .

[220]  D. Raphael,et al.  I: The Theory of Moral Sentiments , 1976 .

[221]  E. McClennen The Liberal Theory of Justice , 1974 .

[222]  B. Williams,et al.  Utilitarianism, uncertainty and information , 1982 .

[223]  Lanning Sowden,et al.  Arrow's theorem, the paradox of social choice , 1981 .

[224]  T. Amemiya QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[225]  S. Toulmin The Language of Morals , 1954, Philosophy.

[226]  Horace W. Brock,et al.  The Problem of "Utility Weights" in Group Preference Aggregation , 1980, Oper. Res..

[227]  Y. Ng Beyond pareto optimality: The necessity of interpersonal cardinal utilities in distributional judgements and social choice , 1982 .

[228]  Interpersonal Utility Comparisons , 1990 .

[229]  B. V. Praag,et al.  The welfare function of income in Belgium: An empirical investigation , 1971 .