Experimental Investigations of Stochastic Control of Randomly Base-Excited Structures

A series of numerical simulations and experimental verifications on vibration control of structures subjected to earthquake excitations have been conducted. In most existing researches, only several ground motions at different levels are considered, and the efficacy of vibration suppression is usually denoted by the reduction of peak responses. In this paper, a complete shaking-table test on a controlled structured is carried out, in which the randomness inherent in the earthquake ground motions was considered. The representative time histories of ground accelerations, as the base excitation, are generated employing the stochastic ground motion model. The stochastic response analyses of the experimental structures with and without control are conducted, respectively, based on various criteria, including peak responses, RMS responses and PDFs of responses. Experimental results indicate that the seismic performance of the test structure with magnetorheological (MR) dampers is significantly improved compared with that of the uncontrolled structure. The investigation on PDFs of the stochastic responses with control system is very important to better understand the structural performance.

[1]  Ding Wang,et al.  Physical random function model of ground motions for engineering purposes , 2011 .

[2]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  Strategy for selecting representative points via tangent spheres in the probability density evolution method , 2008 .

[3]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Semi-active control of floor isolation system using MR-damper , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[4]  Richard D. Deveaux,et al.  Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[5]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  Probabilistic criteria of structural stochastic optimal controls , 2011 .

[6]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  An Experimental Study of Semiactive Modal Neuro-control Scheme Using MR Damper for Building Structure , 2008 .

[7]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics of Structures , 2009 .

[8]  T. T. Soong,et al.  STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 1997 .

[9]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Structural control design: a reliability-based approach , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[10]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  State-of-the-art of semiactive control systems using MR fluid dampers in civil engineering applications , 2004 .

[11]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[12]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review , 1999 .

[13]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  Nonlinear stochastic optimal control strategy of hysteretic structures , 2011 .

[14]  D. Dowrick Earthquake risk reduction , 2003 .

[15]  James T. P. Yao,et al.  CONCEPT OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 1972 .

[16]  Lucia Faravelli,et al.  Reliability analysis of controlled structures , 1997, Proceedings Intelligent Information Systems. IIS'97.

[17]  Zhao-Dong Xu,et al.  Semi-active control of structures incorporated with magnetorheological dampers using neural networks , 2003 .

[18]  James L. Beck,et al.  Reliability‐based control optimization for active base isolation systems , 2006 .

[19]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control : Part II : Active tendon system , 1998 .

[20]  David J. Dowrick Earthquake Risk Reduction: Dowrick/Earthquake Risk Reduction , 2005 .

[21]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Vibration mitigation of highway isolated bridge using MR damper-based smart passive control system employing an electromagnetic induction part , 2009 .

[22]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  The principle of preservation of probability and the generalized density evolution equation , 2008 .

[23]  James L. Beck,et al.  Reliability-Based Performance Objectives and Probabilistic Robustness in Structural Control Applications , 2008 .

[24]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control: part I—Active Mass Driver system , 1998 .

[25]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[26]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Next Generation Bench-mark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Buildings , 1999 .

[27]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  The extreme value distribution and dynamic reliability analysis of nonlinear structures with uncertain parameters , 2007 .

[28]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  A physical approach to structural stochastic optimal controls , 2010 .

[29]  Jie Li,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON OPTIMAL SEMIACTIVE CONTROL OF STRUCTURES:A REVIEW , 2009 .

[30]  Li Jie,et al.  Synthesis method of non-stationary ground motion based on random Fourier spectra , 2009 .

[31]  Zhao-Dong Xu,et al.  Fuzzy Control Method for Earthquake Mitigation Structures with Magnetorheological Dampers , 2006 .

[32]  Lucia Faravelli,et al.  Some reliability aspects in structural control , 2000 .

[33]  S. Nagarajaiah,et al.  Seismic response of sliding isolated bridges with MR dampers , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[34]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy model of hybrid semi-active base isolation system with FPS bearings and an MR damper , 2006 .

[35]  B. Sp,et al.  State of the Art of Structural Control , 2003 .