Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Science-based Enabling Technologies as Windows of Opportunity for LDCs?

Summary In this paper, two relatively new science-based technologies—biotechnology and nanotechnology—are assessed to determine whether they provide windows of opportunity to less developed countries (LDCs) for catch up. By examining international patent and firm foundation trends in both industries, we found that Brazil, China, and India have jumped into these two potential catching up technologies. The paper turns to a discussion of the approaches to overcoming entry barriers that have been successful in this context and also describes why only a few countries are currently in a position to take advantage of them to facilitate catching up.

[1]  A. Daar,et al.  Indian biotechnology—rapidly evolving and industry led , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  J. Bustamante.  New biotechnological applications of coconuts , 2004 .

[3]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[4]  Brigitte van Beuzekom.  Biotechnology Statistics in OECD Member Countries , 2000 .

[5]  S. Loüet.  Can China bring its own pipeline to the market? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  The issue of asymmetrical growth in Specialised Biotechnology Firms in the USA and the UK , 2007 .

[7]  A. Daar,et al.  The scientific muscle of Brazil's health biotechnology , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  You Qin Li.  CHINA IN BRIEF , 1992, Nature.

[9]  A. Daar,et al.  Cuba—innovation through synergy , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Peter Newell.  Domesticating global policy on GMOs : comparing India and China , 2003 .

[11]  J. Niosi,et al.  The Economic and Social Dynamics of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[12]  C. Freeman.  Technology, policy, and economic performance , 1987 .

[13]  Luc Soete,et al.  Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity , 1988 .

[14]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  The technological antecedents of nanotechnology , 2002, IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[16]  Sophie Rovner.  Bad News For 2004 Investment In R&D , 2003 .

[17]  Y. R. Alston,et al.  Nature biotechnology directory , 2003 .

[18]  Moses Abramovitz,et al.  Thinking about Growth , 1989 .

[19]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[20]  G. Cameron.  Innovation and Growth: a survey of the empirical evidence , 1999 .

[21]  Strategies to capture biotechnology opportunities in Chile , 2004 .

[22]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[23]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[24]  W. D. de Heer,et al.  Carbon Nanotubes--the Route Toward Applications , 2002, Science.

[25]  Mauricio Terrones,et al.  Carbon Nanotubes and Related Structures: New materials for the Twenty-first Century , 2000 .