Assessing the use and influence of sustainability indicators at the European periphery

Abstract Malta is a member of the European Union (EU), but faces constraints unique to its status both as a small island nation and its geographical location on the periphery of the EU. Several initiatives to develop suites of sustainability indicators (SIs) have been attempted in the Maltese Islands over the past two decades but there has been little corresponding follow-up to examine the extent to which such SIs are used by practitioners and influence policy. This paper presents an assessment of the use and influence of SIs in Malta by drawing upon the results of two quite different means of enquiry: (i) a more traditional approach in the social sciences using semi-structured and one-to-one interviews conducted with key stakeholders involved with SIs in Malta, and (ii) an innovative participatory approach, called Triple Task (TT) implemented within a workshop context, where stakeholders were placed in teams and asked to explore the use of SIs. Based upon the results obtained with these two methods of enquiry the paper provides insights into the problems of adoption of SIs in Malta and makes the case that rather than being seen as mutually exclusive, a combination of the two approaches provides a powerful means of triangulation to what is a complex set of issues.

[1]  Stephen Dovers,et al.  Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics , 2006 .

[2]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Ecological Indicators: between the two fires of science and policy , 2007 .

[3]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[4]  S. Bell,et al.  Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? , 1999 .

[5]  Communicating about environmental indicators , 2005 .

[6]  Lisl Klein,et al.  On the use of psychoanalytic concepts in organizational social science , 2001 .

[7]  B. Crabtree,et al.  The qualitative research interview , 2006, Medical education.

[8]  Ulla Rosenström,et al.  Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national level sustainable development indicators in Finland. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  S. Bell.  From Sustainable Community to Big Society: 10 years learning with the Imagine approach , 2011 .

[10]  Lisl Klein,et al.  Working Across the Gap , 2005 .

[11]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Crang.  Qualitative methods: the new orthodoxy? , 2002 .

[13]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Harnessing the power of the press with three indices of sustainable development , 2011 .

[14]  S. Bell,et al.  An analysis of the factors influencing the use of indicators in the European Union , 2011 .

[15]  Dan Rigby,et al.  A review of indicators of agricultural and rural livelihood sustainability , 2000 .

[16]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[17]  A. Hezri,et al.  UTILISATION OF SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS AND IMPACT THROUGH POLICY LEARNING IN THE MALAYSIAN POLICY PROCESSES , 2005 .

[18]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Rich pictures: a means to explore the ‘sustainable mind’? , 2013 .

[19]  J. Caddy,et al.  This is more difficult than we thought! The responsibility of scientists, managers and stakeholders to mitigate the unsustainability of marine fisheries , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Stephen Morse,et al.  Breaking through the Glass Ceiling: Who really cares about sustainability indicators? , 2001 .

[21]  Ellis Rubinstein,et al.  Space 25 , 1983, IEEE Spectrum.

[22]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Indicators as a Governmental Technology? The Lessons of Community-Based Sustainability Indicator Projects , 2007 .

[23]  John Campbell.  A critical appraisal of participatory methods in development research , 2002 .

[24]  Ulla Rosenström.  Exploring the Policy Use of Sustainable Development Indicators: Interviews with Finnish Politicians , 2006 .