Who or What Creates? A Conceptual Framework for Social Creativity

Creativity is increasingly understood as a social phenomenon, especially in organizational contexts. This article offers a conceptual framework for social creativity that integrates perspectives from published literature. The foundational questions that structured the literature review are twofold. First, because both individuals and entities, such as teams, can be agents of creativity, who or what creates? Second, through what sites of action or contexts does creative engagement by individuals, groups, and organizations occur? An integrative review of the literature reveals that the engagement occurs in individuals, in individuals interacting, in group work, and in complex multilevel systems. A concept map is used to represent the literature in this domain. This is then discussed with reference to the representative authors in each of the identified sectors. A set of names for the outcomes of the creative process is suggested, including individually generated creative outcomes, socially influenced creative outcomes, socially constructed creative outcomes, and socially generated creative outcomes.

[1]  V. Marsick,et al.  Teams as Learners , 1997 .

[2]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[3]  Nora Madjar,et al.  The Contributions of Different Groups of Individuals to Employees’ Creativity , 2005 .

[4]  D. Jung,et al.  Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Their Effects on Creativity in Groups , 2001 .

[5]  M. Field Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity , 1996 .

[6]  C. Hale Psychological Characteristics of the Literary Genius , 1995 .

[7]  M. West Creative values and creative visions in teams at work , 1995 .

[8]  Valerie J. Janesick The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. , 1994 .

[9]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Attributions of creativity: What are the consequences? , 1995 .

[10]  Christopher M. Barlow Deliberate Insight in Team Creativity , 2000 .

[11]  Consuelo L. Waight,et al.  Exploring Connections Between Human Resource Development and Creativity , 2005 .

[12]  R. Torraco Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples , 2005 .

[13]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[14]  R. Sternberg RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity , 2006 .

[15]  J. Marcia,et al.  Concurring patterns of women’s identity status, attachment styles, and understanding of children’s development , 2002 .

[16]  A. Robustov,et al.  In creative collaboration , 1972 .

[17]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[18]  Sharon Bailin CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[19]  R. Woodman,et al.  An Interactionist Model of Creative Behavior , 1990 .

[20]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[21]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools , 1998 .

[22]  J. Perry-Smith Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[23]  C. Shalley,et al.  RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 2003 .

[24]  M. Runco,et al.  Understanding How Creative Thinking Skills, Attitudes and Behaviors Work Together: A Causal Process Model , 2000 .

[25]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[26]  Patrick Love,et al.  Women's Ways of Knowing. , 1999 .

[27]  E. Torrance The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. , 1988 .

[28]  Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. , 2003 .

[29]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[30]  Thomas N. Garavan,et al.  Exploring Human Resource Development: A Levels of Analysis Approach , 2004 .

[31]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[32]  D. Simonton Creativity, leadership, and chance. , 1988 .

[33]  Muhammad Asad Sadi,et al.  Barriers to organizational creativity , 2008 .

[34]  R. Lipshitz,et al.  Organizational Learning Mechanisms , 1998 .

[35]  Abraham B. Shani,et al.  Triggering Creativity in Teams: An Exploratory Investigation , 2002 .

[36]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[37]  Todd Lubart,et al.  Social creativity: A cross-sectional study of 6- to 11-year-old children , 2002 .

[38]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  Informal and Incidental Learning , 2001 .

[39]  Ronald E. Purser,et al.  Deconstructing the Lone Genius Myth: Toward a Contextual View of Creativity , 1995 .

[40]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[41]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Changing the World: A Framework for the Study of Creativity , 1994 .

[42]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Behavior in Organizations , 1983 .

[43]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[44]  Beth A. Hennessey,et al.  Is the Social Psychology of Creativity Really Social , 2003 .

[45]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[46]  C. Ford A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains , 1996 .

[47]  Alan G. Robinson,et al.  Corporate Creativity: How Innovation and Improvement Actually Happen , 1997 .