The Role of Collaborative Reflection on Shaping Engineering Faculty Teaching Approaches

Over the last several years, engineering faculty and learning scientists from four universities worked in collaboration to develop educational materials to improve the quality of faculty teaching and student learning. Guided by the How People Learn (HPL) framework, engineering faculty worked in collaboration with learning scientists to develop learner-centered, student-focused instructional methods. In consultation with learning scientists, engineering faculty carried out educational inquiry in their classrooms aimed at investigating student learning and enhancing instruction. In this paper we discuss the extent to which faculty engaged in these collaborative endeavors and how their teaching approaches differed as a result of their level of engagement. Study findings reveal the role that collaborative reflection plays in shaping teaching approaches. Results from this study provide insights for researchers and other practitioners in engineering and higher education interested in implementing engineering faculty development programs to optimize the impact on teaching.

[1]  Sean Brophy,et al.  Experiences with Formative Assessment in Engineering Classrooms , 2006 .

[2]  David Kember,et al.  Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning , 1994 .

[3]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[4]  R. Neumann.  Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching , 2001 .

[5]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[6]  Sean Brophy,et al.  Effectiveness of Challenge‐Based Instruction in Biomechanics , 2006 .

[7]  J. Mezirow.  On Critical Reflection , 1998 .

[8]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[9]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  The Emergence of a Community of Practice in Engineering Education. , 2006 .

[10]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[11]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory , 2004 .

[12]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[13]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Characteristics of Successful Cross‐disciplinary Engineering Education Collaborations , 2008 .

[14]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Using the personal response system as a cultural bridge from silent absorption to active participation , 2005 .

[15]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .

[16]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[17]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[18]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[19]  John Biggs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES IN STUDY PROCESSES , 1978 .

[20]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Evaluation of a Challenge‐based Human Metabolism Laboratory for Undergraduates , 2008 .

[21]  Sean Brophy,et al.  Development of challenge based educational modules in the biotechnology domain , 2007 .

[22]  Tony Becher,et al.  Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis , 2002 .

[23]  Roger T. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of engagement , 2005 .

[24]  K. Trigwell,et al.  How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context , 2006 .

[25]  A. Astin.  Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. , 1999 .

[26]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[27]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  The ABET “Professional Skills” — Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? , 2005 .

[28]  John H. Newman,et al.  Instructional Module in Fourier Spectral Analysis, Based on Principles of “How People Learn” , 2003 .

[29]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective , 1996 .

[30]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[31]  Bugrahan Yalvac,et al.  Promoting Advanced Writing Skills in an Upper‐Level Engineering Class , 2007 .

[32]  Richard R. Hake,et al.  Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics laboratory , 1992 .

[33]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations , 2005 .

[34]  Frank S. Oreovicz,et al.  THE SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN ENGINEERING , 2002 .

[35]  Dale R. Baker,et al.  An Intervention to Address Gender Issues in a Course on Design, Engineering, and Technology for Science Educators , 2007 .

[36]  David Kember,et al.  Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning , 1993 .

[37]  Gregory Light,et al.  Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Professional , 2009 .

[38]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .